Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Angrboda]

Please explain why God makes it look like Einstein's theory of relativity and theory of gravity are correct?

[arundharma]

The problem with Atheists is their definitions of Atheism. It makes no sense. They claim that Theists are irrational but they are also irrational. Deep Science is not their strong suit. As well as any deep philosophical constructs. Atheists are just stuck in fake reality that their own mind perceive. Since their minds have been convinced to only accept reality in certain way, their ability to accept alternative facts or philosophy or phenomena is quite difficult.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

The problem with Atheists is their definitions of Atheism.  It makes no sense.  They claim that Theists are irrational but they are also irrational.  Deep Science is not their strong suit.  As well as any deep philosophical constructs.   Atheists are just stuck in fake reality that their own mind perceive.  Since their minds have been convinced to only accept reality in certain way, their ability to accept alternative facts or philosophy or phenomena is quite difficult.

What exactly do you think the atheists’ definitions of ‘atheism’ are?

Boru

[awty]

The problem with Atheists is their definitions of Atheism.  It makes no sense.  They claim that Theists are irrational but they are also irrational.  Deep Science is not their strong suit.  As well as any deep philosophical constructs.   Atheists are just stuck in fake reality that their own mind perceive.  Since their minds have been convinced to only accept reality in certain way, their ability to accept alternative facts or philosophy or phenomena is quite difficult.

bold mine

Which of the three is your proof of god?

[arundharma]

The problem with Atheists is their definitions of Atheism.  It makes no sense.  They claim that Theists are irrational but they are also irrational.  Deep Science is not their strong suit.  As well as any deep philosophical constructs.   Atheists are just stuck in fake reality that their own mind perceive.  Since their minds have been convinced to only accept reality in certain way, their ability to accept alternative facts or philosophy or phenomena is quite difficult.

bold mine

Which of the three is your proof of god?

I don’t need to or want to prove what I know is accurate. If you need proof go find it yourself or just keep going in circles. Requesting proof of God from someone is lazy man argument

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

bold mine

Which of the three is your proof of god?

I don’t need to or want to prove what I know is accurate.  If you need proof go find it yourself or just keep going in circles.  Requesting proof of God from someone is lazy man argument

Let’s try it from a different angle and not asking you to prove anything:

Why do you believe that the existence of God is ‘100% accurate’? Bear in mind that I’m not doubting the sincerity of your belief, I’m just curious as to what led you to be so certain.

Boru

[arundharma]

I don’t need to or want to prove what I know is accurate.  If you need proof go find it yourself or just keep going in circles.  Requesting proof of God from someone is lazy man argument

Let’s try it from a different angle and not asking you to prove anything:

Why do you believe that the existence of God is ‘100% accurate’?

Boru

My own journey

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Let’s try it from a different angle and not asking you to prove anything:

Why do you believe that the existence of God is ‘100% accurate’?

Boru

My own journey

Can you elaborate?

Boru

[Jal]

Please explain why God makes it look like Einstein's theory of relativity and theory of gravity are correct?

"Massive objects warp the fabric of space and time around them." Why don't you explain that.  Oh that's right you can't, because it's mumbo jumbo.

Just because the number add up, doesn't prove that the language objectively represents reality. Right? For example I could argue:

"Heat attracts demons. If you turn up the burner to 212 degrees, the demons will agitate the water. That's the real reason water boils."  I can prove it in a laboratory, because every time I turn up the burner, the water boils. The numbers add up perfectly.


OR, I could think it through, and realize that demons are probably not involved. In the same way, if you think it through, you'll realize it doesn't make sense to postulate mumbo jumbo such as curved space, dilated time,  massless particles, and the relativity of simultaneity.  KISS - keep it simple stupid.

[Jal]

You're funny. 

You probably save a lot of money in the marketplace. I hear intangibles come cheap.

Intangibles move a lot more than an invisible god you have no evidence for.

Yeah keep telling yourself that. Except only one of those two options makes good logical sense.  (Hint: It's not the one where the intangible pushes the tangible).