Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 2:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
#11
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 1:35 am)Shell B Wrote:
(May 14, 2011 at 10:16 pm)rumbuggerylash Wrote: What ye say to that, ye sons of Adam?

I say your definition of fun must run to poorly written and boring fiction. I also disagree, but you knew that or you would not have posted the question.

Beats useless theories and pompous windbaggery. Useless theories which will be replaced by more useless theories, I might add.
Reply
#12
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 1:57 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote: Beats useless theories, which will be replaced by more useless theories.

If I thought that you thought science consisted completely of useless theories, I would attempt to educate you. However, I am of the opinion that you think no such thing.

Reply
#13
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 2:01 am)Shell B Wrote:
(May 15, 2011 at 1:57 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote: Beats useless theories, which will be replaced by more useless theories.

If I thought that you thought science consisted completely of useless theories, I would attempt to educate you. However, I am of the opinion that you think no such thing.

Is that your theory? Would you like me to replace it for you?

Reply
#14
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 2:11 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote: Is that your theory? Would you like me to replace it for you?

Nah, I am working on another theory of my own. Wink Shades
Reply
#15
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 2:13 am)Shell B Wrote:
(May 15, 2011 at 2:11 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote: Is that your theory? Would you like me to replace it for you?

Nah, I am working on another theory of my own. Wink Shades

Hope it is not too dry.

Reply
#16
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 15, 2011 at 2:28 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote: Hope it is not too dry.

Dry like this conversation and your baiting or dry like amazing works of discovery? You see, I cannot really gauge what is "dry" for you, given the fact that you are currently, for all intents and purposes and to all appearances, full of shit.

Reply
#17
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
Rumbuggerylash Wrote:You speaking from experience?

Stating the simplicity that he has experience and will have further such, whereas you shall never enjoy good company Smile
I wonder.... should all troll threads be moved to R'lyeh to keep such levels of stupidity out of the rest of the forum?

But I suppose if we did that, some might suggest all threads on theism be moved there too Tiger
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#18
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
(May 14, 2011 at 10:16 pm)rumbuggerylash Wrote: What ye say to that, ye sons of Adam?

I am no daughter of Eve and should anyone prefer the "fun" of religious texts I would make the assumption that they would also prefer horror stories and murder crimes... also they don't get out much and have no friends, or life
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#19
RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.
Um, yeah. Endless strings of who begat who are definitely more entertaining.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is "Cause and Effect" Scientific? Lord Andreasson 11 540 October 7, 2024 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: Sheldon
  Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes blue grey brain 6 1253 November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am
Last Post: unfogged
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 6807 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
Exclamation Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over? theBorg 26 5324 August 18, 2016 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Fun with flat earthers. Mechaghostman2 9 2057 July 26, 2016 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: Mechaghostman2
  Questioning Scientific Titans ScepticOrganism 19 3611 July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Scientific Studies IATIA 9 2156 May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The scientific version of good and bad Detective L Ryuzaki 15 5510 August 31, 2015 at 12:39 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Scientific Adam and Eve Won2blv 52 15626 June 22, 2015 at 10:57 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Scientific arguments for eating Organic/non-GMO food? CapnAwesome 15 4509 June 10, 2015 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)