Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 11:51 am

Poll: What is your view of the general argument presented in the OP?
This poll is closed.
Persuasive
0%
0 0%
Not persuasive
50.00%
3 50.00%
Don't Know/Other
50.00%
3 50.00%
Total 6 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Gamaliel Never Existed
#1
Gamaliel Never Existed
It is commonly claimed (e.g. here) that "Gamaliel" (referred to as "Gamaliel the Elder" or "Rabbi Gamaliel I") was the "first president of the Great Sanhedrin of Jerusalem" during the mid-first century. But the only possible first century reference there is to this figure is Acts 5:34, which never even says who it was written by, or when it was written down! What's more, this Christian source claims that Gamaliel spoke in the defence of Christians - clearly whoever the author of Acts is has written this Jewish figure into the story to give his tribe of Christians some credibility.

Even more amazingly, not only are there no Greco-Roman sources for this Jewish character, there are not even any Jewish sources for him in the first century! Despite alledgedly being a person of great importance, Josephus completely fails to mention his existence. In fact, the first references to him are found in Jewish traditions written hundreds of years after he is said to have lived, and are clearly biased (the traditions are handed down by Jews after all) in favour of "Gamaliel's" supposed life.

What follows from all of this? Clearly "Gamaliel" has been invented, either by Christians with the agenda of Jewish proselytization and then later adopted by Jews in rebuttal of Christian claims, or by Jews attempting to establish their current Rabbis with some kind of authority (it is no coincidence that Gamaliel is claimed to have been the first leader called a "Rabban" in Jewish traditions) and given new life by the author of Acts to lend credibility to his apologetically-floundering Christian clan (though we should notice the rhetorical flourish the author uses by demoting him to simply a "teacher of the law"). "Rabbi Gamaliel I" simply never existed as a real person of history at all.
Reply
#2
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
Neither did jesus, but that's never never stopped the christians either.
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply
#3
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
Good answer. I think that just about says it all.
Reply
#4
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
Neither did Mohammed, but that's not stopping Muslims.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#5
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
Forgot to add: I've included a poll - would be interesting to see what people think. If you vote, please post your reasons.
Reply
#6
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
Had never heard the name before. Don't know and am utterly indifferent.
Reply
#7
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
A persuasive argument doesn't need to be a sound or even valid argument: it has to be presented in such a way that someone reads it and believes it to be true and even remembers some of it.

This not being any of the three (I was bored of it by the end of the first paragraph), I vote that it is not persuasive. Or particularly interesting, in my humble opinion.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#8
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
(May 16, 2011 at 5:54 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: A persuasive argument doesn't need to be a sound or even valid argument: it has to be presented in such a way that someone reads it and believes it to be true and even remembers some of it.
By "persuasive" I really mean "historically convincing" - i.e. the poll is about the merits of the argument, not my poor writing style. Tongue
Reply
#9
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
There's nothing wrong with your writing style. As you say, Josephus mentions many men who held the high-priesthood without ever mentioning this guy. The office of high priest went out the window when the temple burned down...as did the whole Sadducee establishment.

I've always found it odd that prior to 70, when Judaism was a temple based religion centered on animal sacrifice that the gospels mentioned the word "rabbi." The whole point of temple judaism was that you had to get your ass to the temple every so often and kick in a few shekels to the priests so they could murder a small animal for you. The people did not need "rabbis;" the priests in the temple knew what needed to be done and the people just needed to do as they were told. It that sense....it was very catholic!

Rabbis begin with "rabbinic judaism" which, not so oddly, begins only after the temple is burned to the ground. Josephus tries to portray that as an accident but he's full of shit on that one. Rabbinic judaism thus only gets started after 70....and probably not really until the 2d century which is when they started to compile the talmud. But this brings up an anachronism. Why would anyone call jesus a 'rabbi?' He was supposed to be dead long before the idea of a rabbi got going. But, if the gospels were second century writings then the only jews they would have come in contact with would have been post-temple judaism survivors and the term 'rabbi' might have been in general usage.

Anyway, just something to consider. Besides, you have a point when you say ""Gamaliel" has been invented, either by Christians with the agenda of Jewish proselytization and then later adopted by Jews in rebuttal of Christian claims," because lots of people in the passion story seem to know that jesus is going on to bigger and better things even while they nailed his ass to a cross. Pilate seems upset...his wife is really pissed ( no nookie for the prefect that night!) the centurion gets it....the thieves get it ( Romans did not crucify "thieves" ) there is even a suggestion in later xtian mythology that Caiaphas was really sorry about his part in the little drama so, yes...it does seem that the xtians were trying to work a little ex-post facto magic for their boy.

Of course, if there was no Gamaliel then who was "Paul's" teacher? At what point does the whole house of cards start to come down?
Oh, and while we're on the subject of jews, take a look at this:

http://www.biblelandpictures.com/gallery...=&shownew=


A 5th century synagogue in Tiberias ( Galilee ) with a mosaic floor and a representation of the Greek sun god, Helios.

Now that's not very "jewish" ( as we understand the term now ) is it?
Reply
#10
RE: Gamaliel Never Existed
See? The above post is an example of persuasive writing. Big Grin How to get me to read every post you write? Write them as if you are Minimalist Tiger

But I agree that your post is 'historically convincing'. Smile
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Someone should tell these people Buddha never existed Vincenzo Vinny G. 14 5686 March 5, 2021 at 6:44 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  What would you do if you found out God existed Catholic_Lady 545 102300 March 5, 2021 at 3:28 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  People in bible never existed according to head of Theology at a university in UK! MellisaClarke 79 17770 January 3, 2018 at 12:18 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What would you do if you found out Dog existed? Gawdzilla Sama 16 4000 October 7, 2017 at 6:30 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  I guess you never thought about it, did you? Little Rik 68 18443 September 24, 2017 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  I've never gotten a good answer to.... Brian37 23 6411 October 23, 2016 at 2:30 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Why the religious will never admit you won the argument (and why they don't care) Veritas_Vincit 166 25480 June 30, 2016 at 1:00 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  If in the end, you found that god really existed... Pyrrho 33 7366 June 4, 2015 at 11:43 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  The Legacy That Fred Phelps Never Intended Gooders1002 2 1333 March 16, 2014 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: shep
Information The Thread of Never Ending Religious Propaganda Bob Kelso 23 6891 March 12, 2014 at 6:01 pm
Last Post: Chad32



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)