Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 9, 2025, 11:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Argument From Design
#51
RE: The Argument From Design
@ Shell B sorry about your tail bone and the trouble you are having, know this is no comfort for you but I'll pray about your situation.
@ Rhythm ROFLOL ROFLOL ROFLOL I could not help myself, it surely was not a pleasant experience, the chigger thing that is.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#52
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 4:12 am)Godschild Wrote:
(August 3, 2011 at 12:43 am)Rhythm Wrote: Hehehe, he trotted out the "argument from the eye". Your shit is dated GC, next it'll be "divine bananas".

I do not care about the banana, tell me about man's eye.

I will leave the telling about the evolution of human eyes to Richard Dawkins.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...3635559854
undefined
Reply
#53
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 4:12 am)Godschild Wrote:
(August 3, 2011 at 12:43 am)Rhythm Wrote: Hehehe, he trotted out the "argument from the eye". Your shit is dated GC, next it'll be "divine bananas".

I do not care about the banana, tell me about man's eye.
Who the fuck do you think you are that we would waste our time trying to teach you what you should have been studying instead of hanging onto every word in some primitive, overreaching goat fucker's creation myth that you call bible?

Learn yourself what is a professional publication and find out how to gleam from those what are the dots that are connected to illuminate the evolution of the very eyes you waste on reading the bible.

Let me make it even easier for you. Here are 3 crucial dots. Go study natural science instead of the bible until you become literate enough learn how to find out what these are, how they might be significant, how to locate something else meaningful to connect them:

1. Rhodopsin

2. Rimicaris exoculata.

3. Pin hole eye
Reply
#54
RE: The Argument From Design
No, listen, Godschild. We don't have to address the human eye at all. YOU have to address all the things we've raised in this thread. Why do we have an appendix? Why are we made with two kidneys if we can live with one? Why is there so much of the Earth that is uninhabitable to humans? Why are we required to sleep approx 30% of our lives? Why do a minority of fertilised eggs make it to full term? What kind of design is this?

You can't point to one specific example (which can be explained, by the way) and say 'explain that, if you can't that means I'm right'. Because if it's designed, it ALL has to be designed. Every last thing, from the womb to the pineapple. So why don't you answer our questions about these undoubtedly poor 'designs'.

I noticed you already misrepresented what one person asked, they said why don't we have big pads instead of toes and you said that you'd fall over without your big toe. That isn't what they were suggesting. So please read my post carefully and be cautious not to twist what I have said. Thanks.
Reply
#55
RE: The Argument From Design
If we are designed why is the sewage outlet so near to the play area in women.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#56
RE: The Argument From Design
Sounds like you've had a nasty experience there. Be more careful.
Reply
#57
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 4:27 am)Ziggystardust Wrote: I will leave the telling about the evolution of human eyes to Richard Dawkins.

How appropriate that he is teaching children Cool Shades
Reply
#58
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 1:36 am)Rayaan Wrote: I'm actually quite fascinated by people with bizarre bodies and strange medical conditions.

Like the "tree man," for example:



Uhoh! Looks like he mad Allah MAD!
.
Reply
#59
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 5:46 am)Napoleon Wrote: How appropriate that he is teaching children Cool Shades

Well Jesus was recorded as saying this, which I think is apt describing many of his followers.

People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them; and the disciples spoke sternly to them. But when Jesus saw this, he was indignant and said to them, ‘Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs. Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.’ And he took them up in his arms, laid his hands on them, and blessed them.

Mark 10:13-16 NRSV

undefined
Reply
#60
RE: The Argument From Design
(August 3, 2011 at 7:03 am)Ziggystardust Wrote: Well Jesus was recorded as saying this, which I think is apt describing many of his followers.

People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them; and the disciples spoke sternly to them. But when Jesus saw this, he was indignant and said to them, ‘Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs. Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.’ And he took them up in his arms, laid his hands on them, and blessed them.

Mark 10:13-16 NRSV

Sounds like Jebus has a lot in common with those priests who liked to 'show little boys the way to heaven'.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 7335 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 15522 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4776 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 51259 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 6636 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2403 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 7088 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  I find it hilarious when men argue intelligent design. Lemonvariable72 10 4710 December 3, 2013 at 6:03 am
Last Post: Mothonis
  Derren Brown on 'Intelligent' Design Gooders1002 0 1246 December 8, 2012 at 6:20 am
Last Post: Gooders1002
  'Intelligent' design? Rokcet Scientist 79 29600 March 12, 2012 at 10:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)