Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 3:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof?
#21
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:10 am)Emporion Wrote: Actually, you don't have to use emotions in any of those cases. You either spend time with the person or you don't.

You sound like a sociopath. I never said you had to use emotions in either case. I pointed out which would make more sense. I enjoy my emotions, especially in certain situations Wink Shades not so much in others.

Again, is there some list of "bad" words here that I am not privy to or are you generalizing? The reason I ask is that I cannot really participate in this conversation until I know what you are bitching about. Smile
Reply
#22
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:20 am)theVOID Wrote:
(August 5, 2011 at 12:10 am)Emporion Wrote: "bad" words are total bullshit. They do not exist. A bunch of dickheads made them up.

Actually, you don't have to use emotions in any of those cases. You either spend time with the person or you don't.


And "Actually", her emotions dictate which decision she makes, it is not a question of whether or not she spends time with someone, but whom she chooses to spend time with out of a myriad of options, her desire to experiencing pleasurable emotions and the relationship of the people in question with these desires are paramount in making the decision.

I'm sure she has lots of options of people to choose, but she doesn't need emotions to make the choice.


(August 5, 2011 at 12:20 am)theVOID Wrote: Bad and Good are subjective value claims
Duh Not objective.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:20 am)theVOID Wrote: they exist relative to the values of the people experiencing them, they "exist" just as much love, fear, anxiety, pain etc.
Of course they do.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:20 am)theVOID Wrote: We as a community try and strike a balance so as to make the best community possible, we are lenient and permit a lot of what many people consider "bad words" but draw the line when they are applied as personal attacks on the race, sexual preference or gender of the members. You could possibly express that mathematically if you knew the values of every single member and how they relate to the words in question but that is a ridiculous thing to solve for.

Calling you a "White Dickhead" is not mathematically provable to be harmful.
Reply
#23
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:32 am)Emporion Wrote: I'm sure she has lots of options of people to choose, but she doesn't need emotions to make the choice.

I'm actually quite picky. I prefer using my emotions to make the choice. It makes the effect so much more fulfilling. For example, say I had to choose between two men to go out on a date one night (I realize that makes me sound vapid. I have never had to make such a choice. This is for the sake of argument). If I choose not to use emotion to make the choice, I could wind up with a total putz. Even if I do use emotion, I could wind up with a total putz, but at least there was something about him that I enjoyed.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:32 am)Emporion Wrote: Calling you a "White Dickhead" is not mathematically provable to be harmful.

It doesn't matter if math can prove it harmful. Say he was particularly sensitive to slings regarding his race or his dick and it made him depressed. There you have harm. Things like race, gender and white penises Wink Shades are not something a person can opt out of much, can they? Therefore, it is assholish to sling insults regarding these things. Yep, that's emotional. Nope, it can't be described by mathematics. Either way, you are subject to those rules. Tough titty.
Reply
#24
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:23 am)Shell B Wrote:
(August 5, 2011 at 12:10 am)Emporion Wrote: Actually, you don't have to use emotions in any of those cases. You either spend time with the person or you don't.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:23 am)Shell B Wrote: You sound like a sociopath.
Very close, but I'm much to smart than to go killing people even though I have no shred of respect for anyones pathetic emotions.

I never said you had to use emotions in either case. I pointed out which would make more sense. I enjoy my emotions, especially in certain situations Wink Shades not so much in others.
So?

(August 5, 2011 at 12:23 am)Shell B Wrote: Again, is there some list of "bad" words here that I am not privy to or are you generalizing? The reason I ask is that I cannot really participate in this conversation until I know what you are bitching about. Smile

Oops. I must have confused bad words with "bad" intended phrases.
Reply
#25
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:39 am)Emporion Wrote: Very close, but I'm much to smart than to go killing people even though I have no shred of respect for anyones pathetic emotions.

Sociopaths are typically pathetic, but that's okay. They also don't always kill people.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:39 am)Emporion Wrote: So?

Sew buttons.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:23 am)Shell B Wrote: [quote='Emporion' pid='162008' dateline='1312519195']Oops. I must have confused bad words with "bad" intended phrases.

You are still being entirely unclear about your gripe. Did someone piss in your Cheerios? Are you unhappy with the language you are expected to use around here?

Reply
#26
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:38 am)Shell B Wrote:
(August 5, 2011 at 12:32 am)Emporion Wrote: I'm sure she has lots of options of people to choose, but she doesn't need emotions to make the choice.

I'm actually quite picky. I prefer using my emotions to make the choice. It makes the effect so much more fulfilling. For example, say I had to choose between two men to go out on a date one night (I realize that makes me sound vapid. I have never had to make such a choice. This is for the sake of argument). If I choose not to use emotion to make the choice, I could wind up with a total putz. Even if I do use emotion, I could wind up with a total putz, but at least there was something about him that I enjoyed.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:32 am)Emporion Wrote: Calling you a "White Dickhead" is not mathematically provable to be harmful.

It doesn't matter if math can prove it harmful. Say he was particularly sensitive to slings regarding his race or his dick and it made him depressed. There you have harm. Things like race, gender and white penises Wink Shades are not something a person to can opt out of much, can they? Therefore, it is assholish to sling insults regarding these things. Yep, that's emotional. Nope, it can't be described by mathematics. Either way, you are subject to those rules. Tough titty.

Catch-phrases and thought-stopping phrases don't work on me.

You and all of the atheists here are no better than those religious idiots. You all go for emotional reasons whenever it suits you.
Reply
#27
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:32 am)Emporion Wrote: I'm sure she has lots of options of people to choose, but she doesn't need emotions to make the choice.

No? Name me one other reason she would choose to spend time with one person over another that does not reduce to emotions.


Quote:Duh Not objective.

I never said they were. Experience IS subjective, what did you expect?

Quote:Calling you a "White Dickhead" is not mathematically provable to be harmful.

Then why the fuck did you ask for proof to begin with?

And while you can't mathematically prove that a certain word is harmful you CAN determine which words to permit to appease the most people, it is a function of the number of people, their values and the words in question. It's much the same way two people decide what Pizza to get.
.
Reply
#28
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:46 am)Emporion Wrote: You and all of the atheists here are no better than those religious idiots. You all go for emotional reasons whenever it suits you.

Oh, I see. You're just being a cry baby bitch. Here, I thought this was a serious conversation. You know, sometimes I get awful tired of trying not to insult flaming jerks like yourself when all you spew is this bullshit about how you're repressed and everyone else is emotional and bladdy, blah, blah. Yeah, people do what suits them. It's called being human. I sincerely doubt you are this nonemotional Patrick Batemanesque character you seem to wish you personify. If you were unemotional, you would hardly bother flaming this forum.
Reply
#29
RE: Proof?
He's just angry because nobody wants to spend time with him Shell.
.
Reply
#30
RE: Proof?
(August 5, 2011 at 12:45 am)Shell B Wrote:
(August 5, 2011 at 12:39 am)Emporion Wrote: Very close, but I'm much to smart than to go killing people even though I have no shred of respect for anyones pathetic emotions.
(August 5, 2011 at 12:45 am)Shell B Wrote: Sociopaths are typically pathetic, but that's okay. They also don't always kill people.
Only because you have been brainwashed by society. I'm sure sociopath do not understand emotions and possible mathematical reasons which accompany those emotional ones.

(August 5, 2011 at 12:39 am)Emporion Wrote: So?

Sew buttons.
Why?

(August 5, 2011 at 12:23 am)Shell B Wrote:
(August 5, 2011 at 12:39 am)Emporion Wrote: Oops. I must have confused bad words with "bad" intended phrases.

You are still being entirely unclear about your gripe. Did someone piss in your Cheerios? Are you unhappy with the language you are expected to use around here?

Example.
I can't say "

" without getting the ban hammer.
End of example.

Here, people actually listen to whatever I have to say no matter how radical or unpopular it is.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 5843 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  [Serious] Criticism of Aquinas' First Way or of the Proof of God from Motion. spirit-salamander 75 9337 May 3, 2021 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 8559 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Proof that I'm immortal Shantideva 64 6471 September 11, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  An easy proof that rational numbers are countable. Jehanne 7 2434 February 22, 2018 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Who Has the Burden of Proof? Rhondazvous 10 3911 October 26, 2015 at 10:49 pm
Last Post: jenny1972
  Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist Rational AKD 348 89944 October 22, 2015 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
Exclamation Proof For The Materialization Of Dream Objects Into Reality A Lucid Dreaming Atheist 15 4290 August 19, 2015 at 1:44 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Proof of God Harris 257 62045 May 21, 2015 at 8:24 pm
Last Post: IATIA
  Eternal the originator of time - proof. Mystic 114 20963 April 19, 2015 at 2:00 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)