Posts: 1473
Threads: 20
Joined: November 12, 2011
Reputation:
26
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 4:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2011 at 4:07 pm by Norfolk And Chance.)
Sorry but if anybody is saying - even if just to make a point - that no evidence = no santa (or unicorns and fairies) is incorrect, then they are saying that there could possibly be a santa (or unicorns or fairies). This is completely laughable.
I'm disappointed.
(November 21, 2011 at 3:22 pm)aleialoura Wrote: Do you know that unicorns and fairies don't exist? If so, how do you know?
Because they are fictional.
To argue this point further would be stupid - yes I know debating theists makes people like this - but come on!
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
Posts: 544
Threads: 62
Joined: May 25, 2011
Reputation:
15
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 4:38 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 10:00 am)The_Flying_Skeptic Wrote: Agnostic atheism is superfluous to me. How could anyone be 100% sure?
One might wonder then if one can be 100% sure that unicorns do not exist, or perhaps aether (since the experiment which supposedly debunked its existence could have been miscontrived). Does that make one an "agnostic unicornist" or and "agnostic aetherist?"
Knowledge of God (gnosis) is not the same as belief in God (faith).
James.
"Be ye not lost amongst Precept of Order." - Book of Uterus, 1:5, "Principia Discordia, or How I Found Goddess and What I Did to Her When I Found Her."
Posts: 4068
Threads: 162
Joined: September 14, 2010
Reputation:
95
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 4:52 pm
As said before, you are an agnostic atheist if you do not believe in the existence of God (atheism), but also do not claim to know that He doesn't exist (agnosticism).
However, I do find the term "agnostic atheist" to be superfluous. Just "atheist" is good enough. 
All atheists are already agnostics by default because no one actually knows whether or not God exists. Maybe they THINK they know, or maybe they CLAIM to know, but they don't. And if God doesn't exist, then likewise, you can't ever know that for sure and thus you are still an agnostic. The only way to know that God doesn't exist would be to have an evidence for his non-existence. But, how can there be an evidence for the non-existence of something? That's not possible, is it?
I think that terms such as "strong atheist" and "weak atheist" are more accurate because they specify the probability that an atheist holds about the existence of God. The term "agnostic" seems unnecessary to me because it's obvious that they they don't know. If someone does claim to know that God doesn't exist, then his claim is still not true, so the term is useless, in my opinion.
The point is that, claiming to know or not know that God doesn't exist just indicates the strength of an atheist's non-belief, but he doesn't actually know what he claims to know.
Posts: 1473
Threads: 20
Joined: November 12, 2011
Reputation:
26
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:01 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Rayaan Wrote: As said before, you are an agnostic atheist if you do not believe in the existence of God (atheism), but also do not claim to know that He doesn't exist (agnosticism).
However, I do find the term "agnostic atheist" to be superfluous. Just "atheist" is good enough.
All atheists are already agnostics by default because no one actually knows whether or not God exists. Maybe they THINK they know, or maybe they CLAIM to know, but they don't. And if God doesn't exist, then likewise, you can't ever know that for sure and thus you are still an agnostic. The only way to know that God doesn't exist would be to have an evidence for his non-existence. But, how can there be an evidence for the non-existence of something? That's not possible, is it?
I think that terms such as "strong atheist" and "weak atheist" are more accurate because they specify the probability that an atheist holds about the existence of God. The term "agnostic" seems unnecessary to me because it's obvious that they they don't know. If someone does claim to know that God doesn't exist, then his claim is still not true, so the term is useless, in my opinion.
The point is that, claiming to know or not know that God doesn't exist just indicates the strength of an atheist's non-belief, but he doesn't actually know what he claims to know.
Do you understand Rayaan that a theist can only believe, or claim to know or think he knows god/allah is real? You probably do.
I'd go along with that, and state I know that god is not real with the same certainty that I know that fairies are not real.
Is this an acceptable stance?
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:03 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Rayaan Wrote: Maybe they THINK they know, or maybe they CLAIM to know, but they don't.
Just out of curiosity, do you apply the same standard to gnostic theists?
Posts: 544
Threads: 62
Joined: May 25, 2011
Reputation:
15
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2011 at 5:14 pm by Anymouse.)
"Be ye not lost amongst Precept of Order." - Book of Uterus, 1:5, "Principia Discordia, or How I Found Goddess and What I Did to Her When I Found Her."
Posts: 4068
Threads: 162
Joined: September 14, 2010
Reputation:
95
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:16 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 5:01 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Do you understand Rayaan that a theist can only believe, or claim to know or think he knows god/allah is real? You probably do.
No, a theist can only believe at the extent of his own intuition and inductive reasoning, but he cannot know that God is real.
Of course, this might make sense to himself while others may think that he is delusional.
(November 21, 2011 at 5:03 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Just out of curiosity, do you apply the same standard to gnostic theists?
Yeah, because I don't think that any theist actually know that God exists (unless maybe if they saw Him or something, which I can't prove either).
(November 21, 2011 at 5:14 pm)Anymouse Wrote: We have no evidence of any two physical objects occupying the same space at the same instant. This lack of evidence is sufficient proof to show it cannot happen, at least sufficiently that I do not need to be "agnostic" about the theory of two objects occupying the same space.
I disagree, Anymouse, because lack of evidence for such a thing does not mean that it cannot ever happen, but just that it is highly improbable. So, even if there is no evidence of two objects occupying the same space, one still cannot know for sure whether or not this can ever happen.
In physics, there is something called "quantum tunneling," which proves that the probability of any individual particle in your body suddenly being on the other side of a wall is not exactly zero. The same thing can happen to an individual particle from any other object. So, mathematically speaking, it's also possible that an entire object such as tennis ball, for example, can pass through a solid wall even though the probability of such a thing happening is very, very small. Likewise, maybe it's also possible that two bowling balls can occupy the same region of space at the same time (as strange as it may sound).
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:21 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 5:16 pm)Rayaan Wrote: Yeah, because I don't think that any theist actually know that God exists (unless maybe if they saw Him or something, which I can't prove either).
Cool, thanks.
Posts: 1473
Threads: 20
Joined: November 12, 2011
Reputation:
26
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 5:21 pm
(November 21, 2011 at 5:16 pm)Rayaan Wrote: (November 21, 2011 at 5:01 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Do you understand Rayaan that a theist can only believe, or claim to know or think he knows god/allah is real? You probably do.
No, a theist can only believe at the extent of his own intuition and inductive reasoning, but he cannot know that God is real.
Of course, this might make sense to himself while others may think that he is delusional.
(November 21, 2011 at 5:03 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Just out of curiosity, do you apply the same standard to gnostic theists?
Yeah, because I don't think that any theist actually know that God exists (unless maybe if they saw Him or something, which I can't prove either).
It must be quite unnerving to believe in god all the time yet not know for certain he's real. I'd be constantly worried I was wasting my life away believing something that turned out not to be true.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
Posts: 1336
Threads: 21
Joined: July 24, 2011
Reputation:
26
RE: Agnostic Atheism? Your opinions..
November 21, 2011 at 6:25 pm
Do you tell your fellow Muslims that they can't know of Allah's existence?
|
