(August 20, 2015 at 10:37 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Science is the systematic, structured study of the natural world/universe, Rik. Please don't come to us and tell us what our words mean when English is not even your first language. You're the one who doesn't understand the meanings of the words he's using. Science is not just "any and all pursuits of knowledge by any and all means." If that's what you think it means, you might want to take another English class...or another science class...or maybe both...

You contradict yourself Pinky.
Science is not a word coming from English.
Please do some researches and find out where this word come from.
After that we can talk about the meaning of the word.  

(August 20, 2015 at 10:44 am)lkingpinl Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:42 am)Neimenovic Wrote: HE'S BAAAAAACK

(August 20, 2015 at 10:44 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:37 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Science is the systematic, structured study of the natural world/universe, Rik. Please don't come to us and tell us what our words mean when English is not even your first language. You're the one who doesn't understand the meanings of the words he's using. Science is not just "any and all pursuits of knowledge by any and all means." If that's what you think it means, you might want to take another English class...or another science class...or maybe both...

You contradict yourself Pinky.
Science is not a word coming from English.
Please do some researches and find out where this word come from.
After that we can talk about the meaning of the word.  

Etymology aside, Science is an English word, and you have the wrong definition. Like I said, don't come to us trying to tell us what our words mean when you obviously have an inferior grasp of our language.

(August 20, 2015 at 10:40 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]
It doesn't really worry that but talking about my mother is a different story.
I hope the moderator will do something about it.[...]

But... But... I was just asking a question. Which you did not reply to - very rude. 


BTW - good job quoting my post, in case anyone missed it the first time...

(August 20, 2015 at 10:37 am)lkingpinl Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:32 am)Little Rik Wrote: As usual too many of you have no idea what the real meaning of words are and among the many other words science is one of these.
Science is a way of pursuing knowledge.
Some idiots claim that science is all about the study of the universe.
Other idiots claim other things corralling science in that particular system that please them
but science can not be put within the boundaries of a corral.
Knowledge can not be limited to anyone whim or caprice.
Science is open to anything that help humanity to go forward and that is the end of the story.
We can say that the result has got to be tested and that is ok and make sense but tested how?
Why should only be tested physicaly-materially?
Man is not only made of matter so by confined knowledge to only one of human being charaterisics
one more mistake is made.
Mistake after mistake we get in the intellectual realm of extravagant idiots.       

Not quite right.  Science is limited and cannot answer or give knowledge about everything.  Use science to explain the historical fact that George Washington was President of the US.

The problem with you is that you run thinking.
If you would have read properly my post you would have noticed that i said........Science is open to anything that help humanity to go forward...........do you really think that to know what Dick or Tom
did or who they were help humanity to go forwards?      

(August 20, 2015 at 10:49 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:40 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]
It doesn't really worry that but talking about my mother is a different story.
I hope the moderator will do something about it.[...]

But... But... I was just asking a question. Which you did not reply to - very rude. 


BTW - good job quoting my post, in case anyone missed it the first time...

There is a problem Nutter.
To talk to you i have to lower myself down in the pit.
Why should i?  

(August 20, 2015 at 10:48 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:44 am)Little Rik Wrote: You contradict yourself Pinky.
Science is not a word coming from English.
Please do some researches and find out where this word come from.
After that we can talk about the meaning of the word.  

Etymology aside, Science is an English word, and you have the wrong definition. Like I said, don't come to us trying to tell us what our words mean when you obviously have an inferior grasp of our language.

Wrong again Pinky.  
Science is a word used in the English language but it originate elsewhere
So please don't tell me that my knowledge of English is such and such.
This has really nothing to do with the issue.  

(August 20, 2015 at 10:54 am)Little Rik Wrote: There is a problem Nutter.
To talk to you i have to lower myself down in the pit.
Why should i?  

Uhm... Perhaps because you like the taste...

(August 20, 2015 at 10:50 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(August 20, 2015 at 10:37 am)lkingpinl Wrote: Not quite right.  Science is limited and cannot answer or give knowledge about everything.  Use science to explain the historical fact that George Washington was President of the US.

The problem with you is that you run thinking.
If you would have read properly my post you would have noticed that i said........Science is open to anything that help humanity to go forward...........do you really think that to know what Dick or Tom
did or who they were help humanity to go forwards?      

Yes because those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

(August 17, 2015 at 5:45 am)Ben Davis Wrote: ...................when we examine all of the evidence that's been collected, so-far.

Good Ben.
So, so far you collected such and such evidence but you don't really know whether
there is other evidence to be collected?
Am i correct?