(August 25, 2015 at 8:01 pm)Rhythm Wrote: ....pation

Ha,  yes, that end of the word does change the meaning of that sentence some what.  

I love the utter broken logic some homophobes try to employ.

1- Gay people have gay kids. (Wrong)

2- Gay people can't have kids. (Wrong)

Conclusion: Gay people are going to take over, and wipe us out because they won't have any kids! (Even pretending 1 and 2 are correct, the conclusion is still wrong.)

The fact that some people keep comparing homosexuality to murder and other such ridiculous things shows brains that have been beaten to shit by bigoted indoctrination; or else world class overcompensation for the inability to admit their own sexuality. I really don't believe people are born with this kind of arbitrary hatred.

(August 26, 2015 at 2:15 am)robvalue Wrote: Conclusion: Gay people are going to take over, and wipe us out because they won't have any kids!

Takeover, no that is not what is being argued at all. One your numbers can never achieve such action and two, most children that are raised by the homosexual community are adopted then biologically born. It has more to do with the opening of society to another action/orientations that society’s law is not so open to accepting/allowing them to occur. They have already been mentioned in prior posts and informed that litigation is already occurring to push society's laws to acceptances of them also.

(August 26, 2015 at 2:15 am)robvalue Wrote: The fact that some people keep comparing homosexuality to murder and other such ridiculous things . . .

Again a misinterpretation of the meaning of words written.  It is never a good idea to read and interpret each sentence on its own when reading paragraph's. You will always miss the point/meaning of what is being written. Paragraphs are the collecting of sentences to convey a thought or idea that obviously can not be stated in a single sentences.

The argument that many in the gay community is that their [i]homosexuality is innate[/i], something that they have no control over and is the product of fate/nature. Ok, accept that argument; however, there are many things that both the medical and scientific community have also define as being an innate or having deep elements of innateness that societies mostly deems negative and dangerous or unacceptable. For example, pyromaniac, lying, killing, anger, jealousy, rap and pedophile. (The ever lasting argument in sociology, biology, chemistry and child development on what has more influence on individuals nature vs nurture) Numinous studies and scholar's have argued that those who commit such acts have truly no control of their actions. ( "They are just wired that way"). It is something that is very natural for them to do. Discussion on how society should treat these individuals who engage in such action must change.

That innateness is what Anima is addressing and questioning its actions to be or acceptances. In accepting one innateness, it is unreasonable to think that those who have different innate action would not also request acceptances. This causes many to say to the gay community; “if I accept you innateness what reason do I have to deny another person of their own innateness?” Which has been stated before is already occurring with pedophile right now, with the use of the homosexuality argument of innateness and a loving relationship.

Now you may argue that there is a tremendous difference in that it is illegal, unacceptable to society, a deviant action. However, what you are forgetting is that homosexuality was once illegal to, seen as something unacceptable in mainstream society, a deviant and respectable thing that is done.

(August 26, 2015 at 2:15 am)robvalue Wrote: . . . .  else world class overcompensation for the inability to admit their own sexuality.

Or it could also just be discussing a topic in another point of view. Looking at what is truly a valued or invalid argument when it is put to strict scrutiny.

(August 25, 2015 at 6:30 pm)Anima Wrote:

(August 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Divinity Wrote: I get that you're a bigot, and are really upset that you're on the wrong side of history (as bigots always are), but it's definitely persecution to refuse to hire someone on the basis of their preferred gender.  That's pretty much textbook definition of persecution.

You can't refuse to hire someone just because they're black.  You can refuse to hire someone because they're a member of the KKK.  You can't refuse to hire someone just because they're gay.  You can refuse to hire someone because they're a shithead who thinks gay people are icky (or possibly are worried cocks are secretly delicious)

In both cases I am not doing business with someone simply because they have views I do not agree with.  Both are unlikely to change those views though they may pretend to in order to get my business.

You know I have wondered about that. Why would you go or ask for serves by some business that dose not "like" me or does not wish to do business with me. I would just go somewhere else.
To force a business to work for you?

Man, that could easily be a fuck up situation for you. How do you even truest a business that has been ordered to work for you be respectfully or perform their work to high stander's? And if it is like food, I defiantly would not trust to eat that shit, because of the likelihood that it has been grossly tampered with.

If you're worried about pedophilia becoming acceptable, perhaps you should start looking at the Catholic Church, and not gay people?

(August 26, 2015 at 10:28 am)Divinity Wrote: If you're worried about pedophilia becoming acceptable, perhaps you should start looking at the Catholic Church, and not gay people?

OK, I think you miss the point, (funny that the post was saying to look at the main point) again but that seems to be common on this site so. . . ..

Not sure how the church will lead to pedophilia becoming socially acceptable. The act is still seen as a sin, if I remember, it has not tried to hinder or stop any of the current litigation cases that have found priest guilty of their crime. Around been in 2012 to 2014, (have to look up the actual date) 400 priest were defrocked for either pedophile itself or who had any connection in aiding the crime.

Also they are not taking the homosexual argument to legalize pedophilia in the United State or any were around the world.
However the NAMBLA- North American Man Boy Love Association is taking the gay argument to push for the acceptances both legally and socially.

Oh, it didn't try to stop or hinder any of that, huh........hows the weather up there in the clouds? It's simply found that it no longer has the -ability- to do so,as it demonstrably -had- been doing.

(August 26, 2015 at 11:31 am)Rhythm Wrote: Oh, it didn't try to stop or hinder any of that, huh........hows the weather up there in the clouds?  It's simply found that it no longer has the -ability- to do so,as it demonstrably -had- been doing.

HAHAHAHA yes you are your winner. I so know that you were ONLY going to think about when priest were being moved and NOT about any of the CURRENT COURY CASES! Which is exactly what I said in my posting... HAHAHA . . . Well done.

Yes the many court cases that are currently (important key word there) occurring, since the issue has been brought to the attention of the general publics, have not been hindered or any attempts to tried to stop any of the court cases or clame any international law for any of the priest, has been done by the church ... When the situation was cuccuring in the, depending were you are located 60's or the 70's no they did not, during that particular time, no it did not go to the police. Instead the church tried to deal with it internally by moving the priest away from were they were commuting the crime. I.e moving the priest around.

Its great that they're occurring, course, they're only occurring because the church can no longer obstruct justice as competently as it once had.  You seem to think that this is some excusing difference.  It isn;t.  We know what the church will and would again do if it could, it has a -long- track record.  But go ahead, make more excuses for the church while simultaneously painting "the gay agenda" as villainous, a tool for abuse.

Hey, fun fact, did you know that the nazis wore shoes?  That's why we shouldn't allow shoes in the world, nazis might wear them, just like your nambla bit,...and how that, somehow, has something to do with gaymaggedon. How many points is that one worth? Judges..judges?

Still waiting on those pet definitions of equality and rights.

Still with slippery fucking slope fallacies...

How many times must it be pointed out to you, Ace, that paedophilia is a wholly different ball game to homosexuality? What is it going to take for you to realise the acceptance of one doesn't necessarily lead to the other?

NAMBLA are a group of twisted, sick fuckers who will use any and all justifications to further their cause. The fact that they're trying to assimilate the gay rights movement doesn't make them indicative of the overall climate.

Seriously if you're using them as a barometer of events then you need to get your shit together, and fast...