Must come from a long line of inbred hillbilly retards!

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/scalia-l...can-marry/

Quote:Scalia-loving Tennessee judge: Straight couples can’t divorce if same-sex couples can marry

Quote:A local judge in Tennessee has refused to grant a divorce to a straight married couple, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s legalization of same-sex marriage as one reason he cannot let the man and woman untie the knot.

Hamilton County Chancellor Jeffrey Atherton denied the divorce petition last week, according to The Times Free Press, saying that the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage made it impossible for the state of Tennessee to determine what constitutes divorce.

Go back to slopping hogs, your honor.  Clearly the law is too complicated for you.

Finally, a true christian soldier. Those divorce whores had it coming!!

Yeah, that's bullshit. Marriage hasn't changed. It's still consenting adults signing a binding contract. Divorce hasn't changed either.

What a cunt.

Looks like we have another case of do-your-job-or-quit. Impeach the bastard.

(September 3, 2015 at 11:34 am)Minimalist Wrote: Go back to slopping hogs, your honor.  Clearly the law is too complicated for you.

Are there actual qualifications to become a judge in the USA? Something as exotic maybe, as having attended law school? Or is it enough to be voted into office without actually knowing the law?

Genuine question: Is he still in his job? If so, how?

(September 3, 2015 at 11:55 am)abaris Wrote:

(September 3, 2015 at 11:34 am)Minimalist Wrote: Go back to slopping hogs, your honor.  Clearly the law is too complicated for you.

Are there actual qualifications to become a judge in the USA? Something as exotic maybe, as having attended law school? Or is it enough to be voted into office without actually knowing the law?

For those judicial positions that are filled by elections, the winner could be a fast food cook and serve. It's about the number of votes received. The candidate actually knowing anything about the law is often a bonus.

(September 3, 2015 at 12:02 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: For those judicial positions that are filled by elections, the winner could be a fast food cook and serve. It's about the number of votes received. The candidate actually knowing anything about the law is often a bonus.

That's what I suspected according to my limited informations on the system. And that's what I was afraid to hear. So, basically, a burger flipper could make life or death decisions.

HEY !!

Really, there is a case here.

Does the first amendment guaranty of religious freedom allow the GOVERNMENT to dissolve a CHRISTIAN marriage freely entered into by BOTH parties ????


I DON'T think so, and I'd like a shot at the supremes RUINING all those fucking Christer divorce whoring sluts fun.

Make 'em renounce their Christianity (and sign a piece of paper acknowledging perjury and it's penalties) if they want a fucking divorce and to remarry.