I love how stupid fuckers continue to defend this cunt. They love to show off their bigotry, and cry "Persecution!" They wouldn't know fucking persecution if it was standing in front of them. The stupid fucking bigots cite their beliefs as if it gives them a free pass to break the damn law. Then they cite other people 'breaking the law' to defend the stupid cow. As if, you know, two fucking wrongs made a right. Of course they only defend her, and not the others breaking the law for their beliefs, because they don't have the same fucking beliefs.

The persecution complex bullshit that so many stupid people have today is stupid as fuck. How the fuck is forcing the stupid fuck to fucking sign a fucking piece of paper going against her backwater backwards inbred hick beliefs in the first place?

I challenge the Christers to research this open and notorious adulteress's 'marital' history, discover her FIRST husband's last name, and start referring to her that way.

It's the only marriage she has under her belt that JESUS recognizes, seems like His followers might be inspired to follow suit.

Stop, stop STOP!

You athietits don't unnerstan, K?

Christianities is special, and diferunt and good! No devil worship (like mooslims), just Jesus! We love him so much! Christianitism is America's religion, nothin' else!

So, just shut up and make our cuntry grate agin. Back when it was OK to be straight, god-fearing and american pie taste good too.

I'll bet you commie basterds drive jap cars, am I right?

(September 4, 2015 at 9:25 am)A Theist Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 9:17 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: What?

I think he said the country's gone to shit ever since the far left crazies took over.

Actually it has gone to shit since fascist, xtian, jesus-freak assholes took over.  I'm sure you know the type, Adolf.

(September 4, 2015 at 10:06 am)Divinity Wrote: I love how stupid fuckers continue to defend this cunt.  They love to show off their bigotry, and cry "Persecution!"  They wouldn't know fucking persecution if it was standing in front of them.  The stupid fucking bigots cite their beliefs as if it gives them a free pass to break the damn law.  Then they cite other people 'breaking the law' to defend the stupid cow.  As if, you know, two fucking wrongs made a right.  Of course they only defend her, and not the others breaking the law for their beliefs, because they don't have the same fucking beliefs.

The persecution complex bullshit that so many stupid people have today is stupid as fuck.  How the fuck is forcing the stupid fuck to fucking sign a fucking piece of paper going against her backwater backwards inbred hick beliefs in the first place?

Fuckin' A!

(September 4, 2015 at 10:34 am)vorlon13 Wrote: I challenge the Christers to research this open and notorious adulteress's 'marital' history, discover her FIRST husband's last name, and start referring to her that way.

It's the only marriage she has under her belt that JESUS recognizes, seems like His followers might be inspired to follow suit.

I find it odd that more Christians aren't protesting divorce laws. Shouldn't the far right be more angry that people not only get divorced but that they can remarry?

1 Timothy 2

Quote:11A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. 12But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet

Why don't Christians protest women who are in power over men? If Kim Davis was a 'real' Christian then why would she work in a job where she might have to be the boss of a man?

When I was a kid, any woman with her marital record around here was shunned. And we had damn little of that sort of thing too.

(September 4, 2015 at 8:46 am)ChadWooters Wrote: Kim Davis had as an elected official a duty to follow the law. But then again so did the clerks who broke the law to issue licenses when it wasn't legal to do so. None of them went to jail. What about the mayors and officials in so called sanctuary cities? None of them are in jail. The US constitution has been tortured to the point where anything can be ratioalized no matter how intrusive. The fact is that our governing authorities ignore the law when it is convenient or fits their adgenda. I mourn the lose of a once great nation.

Those clerks were taken to court. And the judge interpreted the statute that they were disobeying and found it to be unconstitutional.

Which is the exact same process that Kim Davis was afforded. She was not jailed immediately. She was jailed after she appealed multiple times, was denied a stay, was issued a direct order from a U.S. District Court to do her job, and refused to follow the instruction of the judicial order.

Had the judge in Colorado, for example, upheld the DOMA statute, issued an order for the clerks there to stop issuing same sex marriage licenses, and they continued to do so, they would be in jail as well. But that's not what happened. Sorry, Chad, your overactive selection bias has undone you again.

(September 4, 2015 at 8:58 am)vorlon13 Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 8:47 am)Chuck Wrote: May she stick to her principles so she may rot in jail.  The world is always better off when there is one less out and about who thinks she has a mission from "God".

What principles ??

She finds out she isn't going to get laid by hubby # whatever while incarcerated and she is going to change her mind.

Well, keep her in jail anyway.

(September 4, 2015 at 10:53 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 8:46 am)ChadWooters Wrote: Kim Davis had as an elected official a duty to follow the law. But then again so did the clerks who broke the law to issue licenses when it wasn't legal to do so. None of them went to jail. What about the mayors and officials in so called sanctuary cities? None of them are in jail. The US constitution has been tortured to the point where anything can be ratioalized no matter how intrusive. The fact is that our governing authorities ignore the law when it is convenient or fits their adgenda. I mourn the lose of a once great nation.

Those clerks were taken to court. And the judge interpreted the statute that they were disobeying and found it to be unconstitutional.

Which is the exact same process that Kim Davis was afforded. She was not jailed immediately. She was jailed after she appealed multiple times, was denied a stay, was issued a direct order from a U.S. District Court to do her job, and refused to follow the instruction of the judicial order.

Had the judge in Colorado, for example, upheld the DOMA statute, issued an order for the clerks there to stop issuing same sex marriage licenses, and they continued to do so, they would be in jail as well. But that's not what happened. Sorry, Chad, your overactive selection bias has undone you again.

As I mentioned in my post the Constitution has been tortured by every regime since Wickard v Filburn to Kelo v City of New London. The words and phrases like well-regulated and general welfare have been divorced from the clear meanings they had in the 18th century when they were penned. The federal government is no longer limited to enumerated powers. They can pretty much do what they want.


So I'm not singling out any particular party or judicial overreach. If the Constitution can be interpreted to mean whatever those in power want then the US is a nation of men, not law.