Dear TheThinkingCatholic,

Piss off.

(September 20, 2015 at 5:05 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Dear TheThinkingCatholic,

Piss off.

Please don't have this attitude.Thank You

.....and that is exactly what incites the response you got. But no, you're right, it has nothing to do with your self righteous preaching and blatant misrepresentation, atheists are just angry cunts.

Dogdamnit I am sick of these fucking people.

I can handle that they're delusional. I can handle that they think they're presenting us with stuff we haven't seen before. I can even somewhat tolerate the spamming.

It's the deliberate act of coming here for no other purpose than to declare they are massively smarter than eeeeeeeeeeveryone here, and to leave all those videos and information for the express purpose of disrupting our membership... and then playing the martyr card by saying that we're going to attack them for their faith. No, asshole, we're attacking you because you're an asshole!

If I had even a tenth the arrogance they claim that atheists do, I'd be going to Christian forum after Christian forum and doing to them what they do to us.

(September 20, 2015 at 5:14 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Dogdamnit I am sick of these fucking people.

I can handle that they're delusional. I can handle that they think they're presenting us with stuff we haven't seen before. I can even somewhat tolerate the spamming.

It's the deliberate act of coming here for no other purpose than to declare they are massively smarter than eeeeeeeeeeveryone here, and to leave all those videos and information for the express purpose of disrupting our membership... and then playing the martyr card by saying that we're going to attack them for their faith. No, asshole, we're attacking you because you're an asshole!

If I had even a tenth the arrogance they claim that atheists do, I'd be going to Christian forum after Christian forum and doing to them what they do to us.

Did I say I was smart? unlike an atheist.Many atheists are very intelligent. It is not intelligence, or a lack thereof, that leads a person to reject belief in God. It is a lack of righteousness that leads a person to reject belief in God. Many people do not object to the idea of a Creator, as long as that Creator minds His own business and leaves them alone. What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether. Psalm 14:1 calls this type of person a “fool.”

I call Poe just in case.

(September 20, 2015 at 5:20 am)TheThinkingCatholic Wrote: Did I say I was smart? unlike an atheist.Many atheists are very intelligent. It is not intelligence, or a lack thereof, that leads a person to reject belief in God. It is a lack of righteousness that leads a person to reject belief in God. Many people do not object to the idea of a Creator, as long as that Creator minds His own business and leaves them alone. What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether. Psalm 14:1 calls this type of person a “fool.”

My conscience is clear, and you are still a douchebag, for all the reasons I have enumerated.

I reject the idea of God altogether because it is obvious to me that all the claims of Christianity are no different than the claims of the other religions, except in petty details, and that the God of the Bible is obviously a projection of human psychology.

I reject the "moral" demands of your God because I find them morally repugnant, starting with calling those who disagree with you "fools" and claiming this has any rhetorical weight. The Blood God of Canaan, as described by the Bronze Age tribal warrior culture that made him up, is beneath my sense of morality.

The fact that you could even begin to claim that I am less moral than a creature that (if I accept your Wholly Babble as descriptive of an actual, existing entity) "demands" genocide and blood sacrifice, while permitting slavery, misogyny, and murderous social conformity rules on a scale almost inconceivable to the modern mind... baffling to me. You people are baffling to me.

I didn't look any further than Scientific Accuracy for the bible. Clear? On what grounds?

Fulfilled Prophecy. Clear? Well, since there are people believing Nostradamus to be accurate, we can chalk this point up to makebelief.

Archeological findings? What exactly? On what grounds does archeology support the bible. Unless it's only about the society of the time. Please, don't bring up the Pilate stone or anything onn that lines. That Pilate was a real person doesn't do anything to proving the bible.

Usual bullshittery, delivered with pseudo science and pseudo evidence.

And on a side note, you should take a good hard look at the 30/30 rule.

(September 20, 2015 at 5:29 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:

(September 20, 2015 at 5:20 am)TheThinkingCatholic Wrote: Did I say I was smart? unlike an atheist.Many atheists are very intelligent. It is not intelligence, or a lack thereof, that leads a person to reject belief in God. It is a lack of righteousness that leads a person to reject belief in God. Many people do not object to the idea of a Creator, as long as that Creator minds His own business and leaves them alone. What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether. Psalm 14:1 calls this type of person a “fool.”

My conscience is clear, and you are still a douchebag, for all the reasons I have enumerated.

I reject the idea of God altogether because it is obvious to me that all the claims of Christianity are no different than the claims of the other religions, except in petty details, and that the God of the Bible is obviously a projection of human psychology.

I reject the "moral" demands of your God because I find them morally repugnant, starting with calling those who disagree with you "fools" and claiming this has any rhetorical weight. The Blood God of Canaan, as described by the Bronze Age tribal warrior culture that made him up, is beneath my sense of morality.

The fact that you could even begin to claim that I am less moral than a creature that (if I accept your Wholly Babble as descriptive of an actual, existing entity) "demands" genocide and blood sacrifice, while permitting slavery, misogyny, and murderous social conformity rules on a scale almost inconceivable to the modern mind... baffling to me. You people are baffling to me.

I just absolutely love this you just gave me, a whole bunch of question's? 
Let me confirm that to you
Why did God allow genocide?
Why did God do blood sacrifice's?
Why God allow slavery or misogyny 
Why did God punish Canaan?
Now because I don't want to waste time,I will have to copy and paste,but please don't try to change the subject and go into that.Thank You