Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 9:46 am
Thread Rating:
Forget Flat Earth Theory, now we have Flat Universe Theory!
|
Oh no it isnt.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Where is the math to prove this?
Quote:"An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity. " RE: Forget Flat Earth Theory, now we have Flat Universe Theory!
November 24, 2010 at 5:00 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2010 at 6:10 pm by Lethe.)
I thought this had been known for a while.
(November 24, 2010 at 3:55 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote: Where is the math to prove this? Data Ridiculously Short and Simplified Summary of Results And, since I'm easily distracted, a video from a piece I watched earlier directly relating to the subject: I can never seem to stay on task...
"Faith is about taking a comforting, childlike view of a disturbing and complicated world." ~ Edward Current
If confuses me how anything that is infinite has a shape. So I'm just going to ignore this and go play in the mud.
(November 25, 2010 at 6:28 am)Skipper Wrote: If confuses me how anything that is infinite has a shape. So I'm just going to ignore this and go play in the mud. No one knows if the universe is infinate in size or not. I personally doubt it, but I don't deny the possibility. What the flat universe means is that you can't leave one spot, go in one particular direction, and eventually return to that same spot as you could on a planet like earth. It means that if you go in one direction for a long enough period of time, eventually you'll reach a point to where you can't move any further - depending on a number of factors.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925 Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan (November 25, 2010 at 1:18 pm)TheDarkestOfAngels Wrote:(November 25, 2010 at 6:28 am)Skipper Wrote: If confuses me how anything that is infinite has a shape. So I'm just going to ignore this and go play in the mud. What is the reason for doubting the infinity of the size of the universe? (November 25, 2010 at 2:03 pm)Chuck Wrote: What is the reason for doubting the infinity of the size of the universe? I personally doubt that the universe is infinate in size because nothing in nature, to my knowledge, is mathmatically infinate and I don't see a reason as to why the universe is to be an exception. From my limited understanding, there are also a number of problems with this mathmatically as well (infinities in equations that represent reality are usually ruled out) but that line of reasoning comes from reading physics books that I read years and years ago, so I may not be remembering this precisely. I also view the fact that the universe is expanding to be evidence that the universe is not infinate in scope, because logically something infinate in size has nothing to expand into. Finally, I don't see much of a reason why the universe can't simply be enormous.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925 Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan RE: Forget Flat Earth Theory, now we have Flat Universe Theory!
November 25, 2010 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2010 at 3:03 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(November 25, 2010 at 6:28 am)Skipper Wrote: If confuses me how anything that is infinite has a shape. So I'm just going to ignore this and go play in the mud. The coloqual meaning of the words shape and flatness is misleading. When people say the universe has a certain shape, what they are trying to say is the fundamental characteristics of space is such that if you ignore local variations caused by disturbances like stars and galaxies, then a hypothetical flat polygon made from straight lines billions of light years in our universe would behaves as if it was etched on a surface of a certain shape. When they say the universe is flat, what they meant is the characteristics of space itself is such that if you draw a enormous triangle billions of light years on each side, with 3 laser beams for example, this triangle's interior angles would sum up to exactly 180 degrees, just like if you drew a triangle on a flat sheet of paper. If the universe is closed, then the the interior angles of this triangle would sum up to more than 180 degrees, just like you would find if you drew a triangle on the surface of a globe. If the universe is Open, then the interior angle would sum up to less than 180 degrees, exactly like you would find if you drew a triangle on a horse's saddle. (November 25, 2010 at 2:16 pm)TheDarkestOfAngels Wrote:(November 25, 2010 at 2:03 pm)Chuck Wrote: What is the reason for doubting the infinity of the size of the universe? The surface of a sphere is infinite. You can keep going on it and never reach an end. It is possible to have different degrees of infinity. Imagine two infinities. One is an ordered collection of all real numbers (..... -1.000000, -0.999999999, ....etc) from negative infinity to positive infinity, the other an ordered collection of all integers (... -1, 0, 1.....) from negative infinity to positive infinity. The infinite number of all real numbers is definitely larger than the infinite number of all integers. You can prove this to yourself by seeing that you can map every one of the infinite number of integers onto a unique real number, ( 1 to 1.00000, 2 to 2.00000, etc) and you still have an infinite number of unmapped real numbers left (0.9999999, 1.0000001, 1.0000002, etc) But you can make the smaller infinity that is the count of integers larger by also including a count of all numbers divisible by 0.5, So something infinite can still expand (......-1, -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1......) This is what is happening when infinite universe expands. The universe can be infinite and still expand because just like expansion of the infinite count of integers, you can take each discreet subpart of the infinite universe, say a 1 light year length analogous to say part of count of integers between 2 and 3, and expand it to 2 light years, analogous to inserting 2.5 between 2 and 3. So the universe can be infinite, and still expand. It doesn't expand into anything, each part of it just expands. RE: Forget Flat Earth Theory, now we have Flat Universe Theory!
November 25, 2010 at 3:11 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2010 at 3:12 pm by Welsh cake.)
(November 25, 2010 at 2:03 pm)Chuck Wrote: What is the reason for doubting the infinity of the size of the universe?Because Infinity is a merely a concept, a numberless expression, and cannot be used to quantify anything. Unlike the universe it is not something demonstrable. Infinity is not a real number or even a real value; it is indefinable as a number so assigning it to anything quantitative or attempting to use it to measure the cosmos is a meaningless exercise. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)