Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 3:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 4.2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 7:41 pm)Losty Wrote:
(October 1, 2015 at 6:14 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Must be abstinent?

No, rocket. God created the infertile phases of a woman's cycle for a reason.

Please take a fucking biology class.

<insert legitimate rape joke here>
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 6:07 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(September 30, 2015 at 9:31 am)dyresand Wrote: Women have right's get over it and besides you are a man were both guys we cannot dictate to women what to do with their bodies. 
That being said they have every right to get a abortion.

What about the rights of unborn women?

People have rights. No brain, no mind, no person, no problem. As a society we have never been in the business of giving rights to the concepts of people in future, except in the broad sense that we assume that the future will contain people.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 5:38 pm)MTL Wrote:


Or become a priest.

That's what I said - rape a minor.

Tongue
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
Here in the UK at least, being an "entertainer" seems to lead to the same fate, stereotypically Confused
Reply
Information 
RE: Esquilax
The development of an infant within one's womb reveals the reality of the said infant developing into a fully formed human being. The future does contain people; its not an assumption, but a fact.


(October 1, 2015 at 7:46 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(October 1, 2015 at 6:07 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: What about the rights of unborn women?

People have rights. No brain, no mind, no person, no problem. As a society we have never been in the business of giving rights to the concepts of people in future, except in the broad sense that we assume that the future will contain people.

What is a person? A person is simply an individual. All sentient lifeforms are individuals.

Who cares if the unborn don't have fully functional brains? They will develop their brains, and the other functions, in time. Fetuses are still fundamentally human: they have the human nature, appearance, etc. They therefore should be treated as such.

It does not matter if the fetus lacks the capacity to think (brain). We know in certainty that it has the human nature, and that it will fully develop in a matter of months, so we might as well treat it as human.



 Read http://www.abortionfacts.com/facts/2 Every human being is a person.

"Age, size, IQ, or stage of development are simply differences in degree, not in kind."

"If personhood is determined by one's current capacities, then someone who is unconscious or could be killed because he is not demonstrating superior intellect and skills. “But give the man time and he'll be able to function as a person.” Give the baby time and so will she."

"Age, size, IQ, or stage of development are simply differences in degree, not in kind. Our kind is humanity. We are people—human beings. We possess certain skills to differing degrees at different stages of development. When we reach maturation, there are many different degrees of skills and levels of IQ. But none of these make some people better or more human than others. None make some qualified to live and others unqualified."


Since the fetus is a human being, it naturally has access to human rights, despite its facilitates not being fully developed.
Buzz
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 2:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: And if you have already voluntarily used your body in a way known to create life and a life is created then what?

Then it is that person's choice what to do about it.  Not a busybody like you.
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 10:42 pm)Buzz Wrote: The development of an infant within one's womb reveals the reality of the said infant developing into a fully formed human being. The future does contain people; its not an assumption, but a fact.


(October 1, 2015 at 7:46 pm)Esquilax Wrote: People have rights. No brain, no mind, no person, no problem. As a society we have never been in the business of giving rights to the concepts of people in future, except in the broad sense that we assume that the future will contain people.

What is a person? A person is simply an individual. All sentient lifeforms are individuals.

Who cares if the unborn don't have fully functional brains? They will develop their brains, and the other functions, in time. Fetuses are still fundamentally human: they have the human nature, appearance, etc. They therefore should be treated as such.

It does not matter if the fetus lacks the capacity to think (brain). We know in certainty that it has the human nature, and that it will fully develop in a matter of months, so we might as well treat it as human.



 Read http://www.abortionfacts.com/facts/2 Every human being is a person.

"Age, size, IQ, or stage of development are simply differences in degree, not in kind."

"If personhood is determined by one's current capacities, then someone who is unconscious or could be killed because he is not demonstrating superior intellect and skills. “But give the man time and he'll be able to function as a person.” Give the baby time and so will she."

"Age, size, IQ, or stage of development are simply differences in degree, not in kind. Our kind is humanity. We are people—human beings. We possess certain skills to differing degrees at different stages of development. When we reach maturation, there are many different degrees of skills and levels of IQ. But none of these make some people better or more human than others. None make some qualified to live and others unqualified."


Since the fetus is a human being, it naturally has access to human rights, despite its facilitates not being fully developed.

Sure. I don't agree with this, but who cares, let's say you're right.


A fetus, like every person, does not have the right to a woman's body without her consent.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
(October 1, 2015 at 3:32 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: delete

Why are you deleting comments after people have already responded to them? That seems very dishonest to me.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
Hmm... Buzz....bee icon...Catholic... Hi, Randy!
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
Lol he even used copy pasta
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 7833 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why do Christians become Christians? SteveII 168 31254 May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  The Obsession with Discussing the Supposed Rudeness of Atheists Whateverist 91 16131 October 1, 2015 at 3:44 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians Nope 155 51186 September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  Why Christians come to atheist forums watchamadoodle 112 22912 March 17, 2015 at 3:32 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  The first Christians weren't Bible Christians Phatt Matt s 60 15810 March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
Last Post: rightcoaster
  Why do christians make up lies when a famous atheist dies? Lemonvariable72 14 7387 September 11, 2013 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Lemonvariable72
  Now Christians piss of Christians. leo-rcc 10 9946 December 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)