(October 3, 2015 at 6:48 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(October 2, 2015 at 11:13 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Mine too. He thinks he's funny, from what I can gather. It seems he considers himself above the Rules, to the point that he thinks taking the piss when he's corrected on them is a victory. Sad, sad little man.

I was proven correct Stim.
As simple as that.
The mods had to intervene when the offensive language by the Nutter and few other got out of control.
If only someone did something when i click the report button two month or so ago it would not have got that far.  

Newsflash: your personal attacks were covered by the speedbump too.

(October 3, 2015 at 4:36 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(October 3, 2015 at 8:05 am)Little Rik Wrote: That is interesting Pinky or ex pinky.
Now i play the pinky if you don't mind.
So far no one has been able to contradict me and yet you declare yourself the winner.
That is bizarre.  
Just take the last issue.
You guys said that the consciousness is a product of the brain.
I did show you that even plants that haven't got a brain are able to register events in the good and in the bad.
Who else register these events other than a consciousness as small as the one in plants?  
So consciousness can not possibly be the product of a brain that is not there.
More sad indeed is the fact that you guys did not register yet this fact.
Shell i say that your amount of consciousness is less than the one in plants?      

That is purple, you dolt. Myself and plenty of others contradicted you for pages...and pages...and pages on the other thread, and you spent most of your time dismissing everything presented to you while adding to your ever-growing pile of assertions and claims. That is a level of demonstrated ignorance that should sincerely worry everyone who comes into contact with you. Your thing about the plants...you're just dicking around with definitions. Plants do not have consciousness. They do not think or feel. They may have evolved responses to different environmental events and conditions, but that's not the same thing as absorbing information through the senses and deciding how to act on them.

Your ignorance is behind belief.
In order to feel and react there got to be a consciousness that register the event.
Plants do not have senses as humans and yet they are able to understand what's going on.
I just hold my laughing for the day that it will be demonstrate in a way that even tough atheists
will have no choice but admit the unavoidable and that day it will be known officialy that
everything is made of consciousness and that consciousness is God.  

Oh, by the way show me just a single example that you contradict me in the past.      

(October 3, 2015 at 5:06 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:

(October 3, 2015 at 6:48 am)Little Rik Wrote: I was proven correct Stim.
As simple as that.
The mods had to intervene when the offensive language by the Nutter and few other got out of control.
If only someone did something when i click the report button two month or so ago it would not have got that far.  

Newsflash: your personal attacks were covered by the speedbump too.

They were a chemical reactions to previous attacks.  
No, just joking.
I wish i could answer in detail but i have been told to shut up or else.
Have a good day anyway.  

(October 4, 2015 at 4:34 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(October 3, 2015 at 5:06 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Newsflash: your personal attacks were covered by the speedbump too.

They were a chemical reactions to previous attacks.  
No, just joking.
I wish i could answer in detail but i have been told to shut up or else.
Have a good day anyway.  

Oh, jeeebs on cheese and rice...

No, you haven't "been told to shut up or else". Take a little responsibility for yourself and your own actions.

(October 3, 2015 at 5:03 pm)Delicate Wrote: Any idiot can contradict someone.

The point is to be able to present something of substance.

Gee, you are presenting a very interesting and difficult philosophical point to understand.
I must have been wrong all my life in thinking that a contradiction is presenting something of substance.
Now i will have to reconsider all my mental thinking.      

(October 3, 2015 at 10:44 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(October 3, 2015 at 7:29 am)Little Rik Wrote: Yoga is 99% practice and maybe 1% theory or less while most religions are the opposite.

The practice IS the religion.

For practice is meant something that help you to advance.
Religions by praying God or better say an external God do not advance a little bit because God is within.
So no advancement no real practice.

(October 3, 2015 at 7:29 am)Little Rik Wrote: Most religions think that God is outside or external while in yoga is within.
Buddhism and Hinduism also think it is within but those who practice are very few.
Just go in any Asia temple and see how these religious people behave.

Quote:What people do in most religions is irrelevant to the question of whether Ananda Marga practice is a religion.  It is.

Everything that bear fruit is RELEVANT.
Actions that bear no fruits are irrelevant.
You never though about it yogini, did you?    

(October 3, 2015 at 7:29 am)Little Rik Wrote: Sarkar was a real guru and a guru doesn't have to take from anyone.

Quote:Ananda Marga
A Practical Approach To Tantra
Contents
Introduction. The Cosmic Dance
1. Tantra: A Timeless Science
2. Meditation: Directing the Stream of Consciousness
3. Asanas: Yogic Innercises
4. Yogic Ethics: Maintaining a Dynamic Balance
5. Food for Consciousness
http://ananda-marga.info/Practical%20Tantra.html

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it most probably is a duck.

And your point is?  

Quote:Sarkar borrowed from traditional Hindu practice and lore.

And your evidence that this is the case is?  

(October 3, 2015 at 7:29 am)Little Rik Wrote: Shiva and Krisna were also gurus and all guru take from within because they reach the goal of life
and when you get there there is only one truth that is why this truth is the same for anyone who get there.

Quote:Blah blah blah.  You don't know any of this.  It's just the babbling of a deluded acolyte.

And your evidence that i don't know any of this is?  

Have a good day yog.  

I thought this whole "belief" thing was covered. ONCE and for the LAST time, Atheism is a "disbelief in God" and not a belief. Gnostic Atheism is only "belief". And Gnostic anything is pretty rare.

(October 4, 2015 at 4:28 am)Little Rik Wrote: Your ignorance is behind belief.
In order to feel and react there got to be a consciousness that register the event.
Plants do not have senses as humans and yet they are able to understand what's going on.
I just hold my laughing for the day that it will be demonstrate in a way that even tough atheists
will have no choice but admit the unavoidable and that day it will be known officialy that
everything is made of consciousness and that consciousness is God.  

Oh, by the way show me just a single example that you contradict me in the past.      

Could you also hold your breath while you're doing that?


Also, I think you mean to say that my ignorance is "beyond belief." I know English isn't your first language, but if you're going to call someone else ignorant, don't fuck up their language in the very act of doing so. My computer doesn't have drivers installed for that level of idiocy, irony, and hypocrisy.


I directly contradicted you (with evidence) about near death experiences and how they are basically dreams that happen completely inside the brain (like all dreams). Your response was essentially "Nuh-uh it's majik floting conshusness   " with nothing to support such an assertion. Regardless of whether you see it, you were substantially contradicted on virtually every point you've tried to make so far.


Plants do not feel, and they do not "react" in the sense that you mean. They do not receive sensory input and produce a voluntary response. Yes, if you cut them, one thing happens, and if you fertilize them, another thing happens, but that doesn't mean that the plants are consciously sensing those stimuli or actively choosing those responses. It just means they've evolved different automatic responses to those events. How hard is this concept?

(October 4, 2015 at 9:56 am)bambi_swag Wrote: I thought this whole "belief" thing was covered. ONCE and for the LAST time, Atheism is a "disbelief in God" and not a belief. Gnostic Atheism is only "belief". And Gnostic anything is pretty rare.

No, it is lack of belief in theistic claims. "Disbelief in God" entails active rejection of belief in this "God", which although can be embraced by the category, is not central to atheism. Theism says "a god exists"; atheism says "I need justification before I can believe that claim. Got any?"

(October 4, 2015 at 4:28 am)Little Rik Wrote:

Quote:Your ignorance is behind belief.
In order to feel and react there got to be a consciousness that register the event.

Basically you are wrong. I could go into dfetail as why but there is no point. You have demonstrated that you are all transmit and no recieve.

Quote:Plants do not have senses as humans and yet they are able to understand what's going on.

They do not understand, they reate due to complex reactions that do not resemble....oh why am I even bothering.

Quote:I just hold my laughing for the day that it will be demonstrate in a way that even tough atheists
will have no choice but admit the unavoidable and that day it will be known officialy that
everything is made of consciousness and that consciousness is God.  

No

Quote:Oh, by the way show me just a single example that you contradict me in the past.      

Your kidding right?