(October 7, 2015 at 6:40 pm)Evie Wrote: Sorry

I didn't mean you and you damn well know that.

I wasn't entirely sure....... I am in kind of a wacky mood.

(October 7, 2015 at 10:28 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(October 7, 2015 at 6:51 am)Little Rik Wrote: You never finish to be rude yog, do you?
First you post a lot of garbage material that show how AM is bad.
When i reply to you explaining the very reason why AM has got such a bad
reputation you come up with the story that this has nothing to do with your question.
How stupid can you be?
If all the garbage material that you post has nothing to do with your question why then
you post them in the first place?  

I'm rude and making up stories?  The question I was responding to was right in the post you responded to.
Now you're making up stories to explain your incompetence in reading a simple post.
I don't care whether you're Hindu or Tantra or Yoga or Scooby-doo -- you are an idiot.

Here's the post with question for reference.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-36732-po...pid1072458

Both you and the nutter seem to be very thickheaded.
You keep on taking informations from the media that take from police which take from the security services.
So what you really get at the end?
You get what is in the interest of those people who control the show not the truth.
Sorry yog.
If you are really interested in getting the correct information never rely on those who control the show.
But i guess it would be quite difficult for thickheaded like you to know where to start from.
Have you ever guessed why those who control the show always try to get the Manning the Snowden the Assange and anyone else who doesn't believe in the official truth?  

(October 8, 2015 at 10:14 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(October 7, 2015 at 10:28 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I'm rude and making up stories?  The question I was responding to was right in the post you responded to.
Now you're making up stories to explain your incompetence in reading a simple post.
I don't care whether you're Hindu or Tantra or Yoga or Scooby-doo -- you are an idiot.

Here's the post with question for reference.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-36732-po...pid1072458

Both you and the nutter seem to be very thickheaded.
You keep on taking informations from the media that take from police which take from the security services.
So what you really get at the end?
You get what is in the interest of those people who control the show not the truth.
Sorry yog.
If you are really interested in getting the correct information never rely on those who control the show.
But i guess it would be quite difficult for thickheaded like you to know where to start from.
Have you ever guessed why those who control the show always try to get the Manning the Snowden the Assange and anyone else who doesn't believe in the official truth?  

There you go ranting about things unrelated to the question again.

(October 8, 2015 at 10:14 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(October 7, 2015 at 10:28 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I'm rude and making up stories?  The question I was responding to was right in the post you responded to.
Now you're making up stories to explain your incompetence in reading a simple post.
I don't care whether you're Hindu or Tantra or Yoga or Scooby-doo -- you are an idiot.

Here's the post with question for reference.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-36732-po...pid1072458

Both you and the nutter seem to be very thickheaded.
You keep on taking informations from the media that take from police which take from the security services.
So what you really get at the end?
You get what is in the interest of those people who control the show not the truth.
Sorry yog.
If you are really interested in getting the correct information never rely on those who control the show.
But i guess it would be quite difficult for thickheaded like you to know where to start from.
Have you ever guessed why those who control the show always try to get the Manning the Snowden the Assange and anyone else who doesn't believe in the official truth?  

Rik, if you don't mind me asking, where are you from?

(October 7, 2015 at 10:41 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(October 7, 2015 at 6:51 am)Little Rik Wrote: But let us talk about the mantra.
It is true what i did post in the past (as you post it again) but what this has to do with my saying that Hindu mantra is useless?
Hindus use an old mantra and like all old thing is not helpful these days.
Sarkar on the other hand give us an individual mantra in tune with today universal vibrations.
And the evidence that is the right mantra is that is working.
If the Hindu mantra would work these people would not be following dreadful dogmas like those who i just show you in the previous post.  

That you use different ones doesn't change the fact that Sarkar borrowed the idea of a mantra.  
His whole practice is one part new bullshit and one part old dogmas.

You don't see it because one of the dogmas is that you don't follow dogmas.  It's a lie.

Borrow from who yog?
It would be bizarre to borrow the mantra from Hinduism when in fact Sarkar is (was) against all Hindu dogmas which are the pillar of Hinduism.
Beside AM mantras are totally different from Hinduism mantra.
You can't borrow the idea of the mantra.
If you borrow you borrow the whole mantra.
Why Sarkar would borrow a mantra that lead to such bad dogmas like the caste system the dowry the untouchable the sacred cow the many Gods and so on?
Only an idiot or a thickhead would think like this.  

But you're not being rational yourself!

(October 8, 2015 at 10:27 am)Little Rik Wrote: [quote pid='1075457' dateline='1444228880']
Why Sarkar would borrow a mantra that lead to such bad dogmas like the caste system the dowry the untouchable the sacred cow the many Gods and so on?
Only an idiot or a thickhead would think like this.  

I would suggest that only an idiot or a "thickhead" thinks that there is some kind of necessary connection between a mantra and some dogma embraced by a number of people, not all of whom can be demonstrated to use the mantra. Can you demonstrate that this or that mantra "leads to" this or that dogma?

(October 8, 2015 at 10:27 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(October 8, 2015 at 10:14 am)Little Rik Wrote: Both you and the nutter seem to be very thickheaded.
You keep on taking informations from the media that take from police which take from the security services.
So what you really get at the end?
You get what is in the interest of those people who control the show not the truth.
Sorry yog.
If you are really interested in getting the correct information never rely on those who control the show.
But i guess it would be quite difficult for thickheaded like you to know where to start from.
Have you ever guessed why those who control the show always try to get the Manning the Snowden the Assange and anyone else who doesn't believe in the official truth?  

Rik, if you don't mind me asking, where are you from?

http://atheistforums.org/thread-18501-page-39.html

(October 8, 2015 at 10:39 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(October 8, 2015 at 10:27 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Rik, if you don't mind me asking, where are you from?

http://atheistforums.org/thread-18501-page-39.html

Was the the duomo in Milan?