Posts: 3676
Threads: 354
Joined: April 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 8:59 pm
(October 10, 2015 at 6:38 pm)MTL Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 5:40 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: Je suis allé au Canada il y a longtemps quand vous n'aviez pas besoin de passeport. S'il vous plaît excuser mon Français. Ce n'est pas natif, mais j'aime les langues de toutes sortes.
Je suis étudiant Français, moi-même.
vous prenez une classe ou étudier indépendamment ?
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Posts: 3676
Threads: 354
Joined: April 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 9:14 pm
(October 10, 2015 at 6:47 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 6:25 pm)MTL Wrote: You are absolutely right. No arguments. I was painting in rather broad strokes to get my point across about Anglos and Francos, in Canada, today.
I could go into the entire history of New France, Creole, Acadien/Cajun,
....and even Huguenots...but we'd be here, awhile 
EDIT: I sincerely hope I didn't offend you with my generalization. I know the story of the Acadiens and the Mi'kmaq; I know the story of New France and the British Colonies and Québec....I actually have Huguenot ancestry, myself, and THAT's a whole nother story, too.
No! I'm delighted that you know about us at all. Most people just sweep us in with the other Canadian French, and we're nothing like them. In fact, we were often disinclined to get along with them at all, especially early on, because we had fled the fighting around La Rochelle on the west coast of France, and disdained all things of the nobility and the old empire. It's why we stayed so isolated until the 18th century (1710) thrust itself upon us, as the French and British both took interest in the region because the Brits built Halifax (and its harbor) as a fairly major naval base in the region.
If you have not read them, and you'd like to know more about our history and culture, I recommend the following three books, in order of recommendation:
The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 by Carl A. Brasseaux (which, despite the title, also contains the origins in l'Acadie.)
A Great and Noble Scheme: The Tragic Story of the Expulsion of the French Acadians from Their American Homeland by John Mack Faragher
The Cajuns: Americanization of a People by Shane K. Bernard
(As a bonus book, if you want something more cultural and more fun, try Gumbo Ya-ya: Folk Tales of Louisiana, edited by Saxon, Dreyer, and Tallant. "Ya-ya", or "aya", comes from an Afro-Caribbean word for rice, and forms the second half of the word Jambalaya, jambon + a la + aya, or roughly "ham-and-rice".) Rock, you are a walking encyclopedia of Cajon history. Because of you, I will never confuse Cajuns and Creoles.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Posts: 1587
Threads: 21
Joined: June 13, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 10:10 pm
(October 10, 2015 at 8:59 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 6:38 pm)MTL Wrote: Je suis étudiant Français, moi-même.
vous prenez une classe ou étudier indépendamment ?
Indépendamment.
Posts: 3395
Threads: 43
Joined: February 8, 2015
Reputation:
33
RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 10:43 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2015 at 10:46 pm by Pyrrho.)
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Posts: 25250
Threads: 28
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
105
RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 11:35 pm
Quoth Shaw, "The English and the Americans are two peoples separated by a common language."
Posts: 1587
Threads: 21
Joined: June 13, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: Sweet story...
October 11, 2015 at 12:41 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 12:42 am by MTL.)
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Sweet story...
October 11, 2015 at 1:18 am
(October 10, 2015 at 9:14 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 6:47 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: No! I'm delighted that you know about us at all. Most people just sweep us in with the other Canadian French, and we're nothing like them. In fact, we were often disinclined to get along with them at all, especially early on, because we had fled the fighting around La Rochelle on the west coast of France, and disdained all things of the nobility and the old empire. It's why we stayed so isolated until the 18th century (1710) thrust itself upon us, as the French and British both took interest in the region because the Brits built Halifax (and its harbor) as a fairly major naval base in the region.
If you have not read them, and you'd like to know more about our history and culture, I recommend the following three books, in order of recommendation:
The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 by Carl A. Brasseaux (which, despite the title, also contains the origins in l'Acadie.)
A Great and Noble Scheme: The Tragic Story of the Expulsion of the French Acadians from Their American Homeland by John Mack Faragher
The Cajuns: Americanization of a People by Shane K. Bernard
(As a bonus book, if you want something more cultural and more fun, try Gumbo Ya-ya: Folk Tales of Louisiana, edited by Saxon, Dreyer, and Tallant. "Ya-ya", or "aya", comes from an Afro-Caribbean word for rice, and forms the second half of the word Jambalaya, jambon + a la + aya, or roughly "ham-and-rice".) Rock, you are a walking encyclopedia of Cajon history. Because of you, I will never confuse Cajuns and Creoles.
I find it fascinating, but wouldn't call myself an encyclopedia. I just happen to own those four books and have them sitting here next to my desk. They were recommended by Dr. Brasseaux (a friend of my mom's), one of the premier Cajun historians in the state. Thought I'd pass along the recommendations.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Sweet story...
October 11, 2015 at 1:29 am
(October 11, 2015 at 12:41 am)MTL Wrote: When someone says "kick him to the curb" they certainly succeed in conveying a clear mental image,
even though it isn't exactly Shakespeare.
I dunno, it sounds very much like Shakespeare, to me. He was always making up turns of phrase like that.
One of my favorite Shakespearean inventions is the term "elbow-room".
He invented lots of badass and still-used phrases.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 25250
Threads: 28
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
105
RE: Sweet story...
October 11, 2015 at 1:42 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 1:43 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
I don't make a fetish of traditional terms myself. We are taught that the classics are high art, but if you look at the writing, oftentimes it is far outside the bounds of what was considered at the time good writing -- Hemingway with his run-on sentences, Chaucer with his bawdy punnery, and so forth. The spoken language is only different in that it evolves faster than the written language, but that evolution is entirely natural, because humans use language to describe their experiences, and their experiences change with the eras.
I'm not fond of American shorthand -- "thru", "nu", text-speak, and so on -- but I think that is probably a result of it being evolved from the language as I learnt it, rather than the language itself being debased. Simply because something is old doesn't mean it's better, and simply because something is new, that doesn't mean it is intrinsically inferior. Repurposing words, shortening their length, introducing slang into the "proper" lexicon ("ain't" got your teacher's opprobrium when I was a child, but it's in the OED now) -- that's all fine with me, because at the root of it, language is a tool, and a tool is only as survivable as it is adaptable.
I write that as a lifelong lover of the language.
(October 11, 2015 at 1:29 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (October 11, 2015 at 12:41 am)MTL Wrote: When someone says "kick him to the curb" they certainly succeed in conveying a clear mental image,
even though it isn't exactly Shakespeare.
I dunno, it sounds very much like Shakespeare, to me. He was always making up turns of phrase like that.
One of my favorite Shakespearean inventions is the term "elbow-room".
He invented lots of badass and still-used phrases.
Mazactly!
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Sweet story...
October 11, 2015 at 1:44 am
(October 11, 2015 at 1:42 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: I don't make a fetish of traditional terms myself. We are taught that the classics are high art, but if you look at the writing, oftentimes it is far outside the bounds of what was considered at the time good writing -- Hemingway with his run-on sentences, Chaucer with his bawdy punnery, and so forth. The spoken language is only different in that it evolves faster than the written language, but that evolution is entirely natural, because humans use language to describe their experiences, and their experiences change with the eras.
I'm not fond of American shorthand -- "thru", "nu", text-speak, and so on -- but I think that is probably a result of it being evolved from the language as I learnt it, rather than the language itself being debased. Simply because something is old doesn't mean it's better, and simply because something is new, that doesn't mean it is intrinsically inferior. Repurposing words, shortening their length, introducing slang into the "proper" lexicon ("ain't" got your teacher's opprobrium when I was a child, but it's in the OED now) -- that's all fine with me, because at the root of it, language is a tool, and a tool is only as survivable as it is adaptable.
I write that as a lifelong lover of the language.
I refuse to give up my use of the perfectly-good second person plural contraction, "y'all". I don't care who thinks it makes me sound like a stupid Southerner.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
|