(October 17, 2015 at 3:40 pm)JBrentonK Wrote:

(October 17, 2015 at 3:32 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: God you are fucking lame.

That might sound like some lame homework, but I promise you, it is proof that I am the son of God. There is literally no one else in the world that has a family of God adjective in their name. If you want to prove it, I suggest you stay to your homework. Get to it.

Fuck off, douche bag.

(October 17, 2015 at 3:28 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: I may not have been right about cilia but I will tell you this. Something we all can discuss that still pertains to the thread and the name Killingsworth. Even if Killingsworth + cyllia (cyllia? or cylla? I forget) is nonsense (whatever it means), there is something else just like that; and the interesting thing is, it pertains to this same debate. I am going to give you guys some homework. You need it. ........My name is James Brenton Killingsworth. I would link my facebook page for proof but all you really got to do to find it out is google it. Now, that might not sound like very much homework. But I promise you my name pronounced aloud comes out just like "christ." Therefore, proving that I am a part of the family of God. Or God's family. We may all be a part of God's family, but we really are not a part of the family of God's.

Either way you come to a conclusion on that, I want you to remember my name. James Brenton Killingsworth. It is pronounced just like "Christ." When you try to disprove that my name is Killingsworth or Christ, I will tell you, "No, I am a member of the family of God." This is actual proof that Killingsworth is a name of Gods family, and proof that I am the son of God. Simple homework really.

When anyone here has come to see the light, there may be hope for Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes after all. However I am still betting this thread has not been enough initiative to research the fathers of these ancient kings.

You, who are in need of education, a straitjacket, and some really good meds, are giving us homework?  Why is it that the delusional ones also have an ego that, if there WAS a god, would cause god to send down a lightening bolt and fry the idiot who thought he was competition?  "No gods before me, that includes looking in the mirror!"  Woo-hoo, and HOW.   Initiative?  No, wack-a-doodle-dipsy, (who is probably 13, suffering delusions of grandeur, pulling on his pud in his mommy's basement) - - not a lack of initiative:  a decided lack of interest.  
     Now, you want to ignite that interest?   Ok.   Show up at San Alfonso del Mar with a video crew.  Walk across the pool.  Then maybe, we MIGHT want to know about JBoiningtonColonhair.

(October 17, 2015 at 3:47 pm)drfuzzy Wrote:

(October 17, 2015 at 3:28 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: I may not have been right about cilia but I will tell you this. Something we all can discuss that still pertains to the thread and the name Killingsworth. Even if Killingsworth + cyllia (cyllia? or cylla? I forget) is nonsense (whatever it means), there is something else just like that; and the interesting thing is, it pertains to this same debate. I am going to give you guys some homework. You need it. ........My name is James Brenton Killingsworth. I would link my facebook page for proof but all you really got to do to find it out is google it. Now, that might not sound like very much homework. But I promise you my name pronounced aloud comes out just like "christ." Therefore, proving that I am a part of the family of God. Or God's family. We may all be a part of God's family, but we really are not a part of the family of God's.

Either way you come to a conclusion on that, I want you to remember my name. James Brenton Killingsworth. It is pronounced just like "Christ." When you try to disprove that my name is Killingsworth or Christ, I will tell you, "No, I am a member of the family of God." This is actual proof that Killingsworth is a name of Gods family, and proof that I am the son of God. Simple homework really.

When anyone here has come to see the light, there may be hope for Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes after all. However I am still betting this thread has not been enough initiative to research the fathers of these ancient kings.

You, who are in need of education, a straitjacket, and some really good meds, are giving us homework?  Why is it that the delusional ones also have an ego that, if there WAS a god, would cause god to send down a lightening bolt and fry the idiot who thought he was competition?  "No gods before me, that includes looking in the mirror!"  Woo-hoo, and HOW.   Initiative?  No, wack-a-doodle-dipsy, (who is probably 13, suffering delusions of grandeur, pulling on his pud in his mommy's basement) - - not a lack of initiative:  a decided lack of interest.  
     Now, you want to ignite that interest?   Ok.   Show up at San Alfonso del Mar with a video crew.  Walk across the pool.  Then maybe, we MIGHT want to know about JBoiningtonColonhair.

Sounds like the average reply of an atheist.
No sweat.

I take it that you have no idea who Sophocles Euripides or Aristophanes were. It seems obvious. You know what cilia is but it's very unlikely that you'd have the first clue about these three.

So you have a lack of interest in me being the son of God? That is interesting. I bet I can prove to the world that I am the son of God before news gets across to atheistforums.org. That would be interesting too. I promise I'd come back and start a thread dedicated to the issue though. You know what gets me, mr witch doctor hater? Atheists that have never recognized that they are atheists long enough to reflect on their stupidity. I just cannot see "being an atheist" in this world. It's the animal man/woman atheist that strikes me the most though. Lacking "completely" the instincts of natural rational man, going through the world totally blind to the obvious truth (God). It's like a diswasher that needs dishes but somebody is too busy washing their hands in the sink to bother. Or something. You atheists that are "tired of witchdoctors" but have not got enough paitence to pay attention to actually getting a "real" message across. You see boundless topics at a Christian forum. Weather it's someones sick or weather or not somebody is in need of an actual fucking dollar, you see real topics. You don't see these here. You don't see them conversing with atheists, and you surely don't see them conversing with somebody like you.

-TheWitchDoctor.

Nobody cares, crackpot.

(October 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)JBrentonK Wrote:

(October 17, 2015 at 3:47 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: You, who are in need of education, a straitjacket, and some really good meds, are giving us homework?  Why is it that the delusional ones also have an ego that, if there WAS a god, would cause god to send down a lightening bolt and fry the idiot who thought he was competition?  "No gods before me, that includes looking in the mirror!"  Woo-hoo, and HOW.   Initiative?  No, wack-a-doodle-dipsy, (who is probably 13, suffering delusions of grandeur, pulling on his pud in his mommy's basement) - - not a lack of initiative:  a decided lack of interest.  
     Now, you want to ignite that interest?   Ok.   Show up at San Alfonso del Mar with a video crew.  Walk across the pool.  Then maybe, we MIGHT want to know about JBoiningtonColonhair.

Sounds like the average reply of an atheist.
No sweat.

I take it that you have no idea who Sophocles Euripides or Aristophanes were. It seems obvious. You know what cilia is but it's very unlikely that you'd have the first clue about these three.

So you have a lack of interest in me being the son of God? That is interesting. I bet I can prove to the world that I am the son of God before news gets across to atheistforums.org. That would be interesting too. I promise I'd come back and start a thread dedicated to the issue though. You know what gets me, mr witch doctor hater? Atheists that have never recognized that they are atheists long enough to reflect on their stupidity. I just cannot see "being an atheist" in this world. It's the animal man/woman atheist that strikes me the most though. Lacking "completely" the instincts of natural rational man, going through the world totally blind to the obvious truth (God). It's like a diswasher that needs dishes but somebody is too busy washing their hands in the sink to bother. Or something. You atheists that are "tired of witchdoctors" but have not got enough paitence to pay attention to actually getting a "real" message across. You see boundless topics at a Christian forum. Weather it's someones sick or weather or not somebody is in need of an actual fucking dollar, you see real topics. You don't see these here. You don't see them conversing with atheists, and you surely don't see them conversing with somebody like you.

-TheWitchDoctor.

And "god" can't even spell.  Not only that, but now I have the mental image of a bloated, pasty white guy in a loincloth and facepaint.  Of course I know who your collected greeks were.  So the hell what?  Go ahead, asswipe.  Prove yourself in front of a world-wide camera crew.  Until then, fuckitty-bye, douchebag.

You can call me a crackpot all you want to, for trying to give you guys actual, credible homework. But before the homework starts, I'd bet that we can prove it in forum fashion.

Well... I doubt that. But even if we did prove it, what is it going to change? My life? What does that matter?

What about Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes? These people wrote significantly amazing very long poems back when Greece was big. That's like 100,000,000 years ago or whatever. Why is it that these people are never discussed? Since they are the sons of God, can they at least have some credibility to back them up? No? What they did for literature is one of the most amazing things ever done. They created Shakespearean comedies and poems hundreds of thousands of years ago. Yet they are not truly recognized for it. Well that recognition is coming. They will get what they deserve, if it takes everyone else out of literature to accomplish it.

Why is it nobody knows these people? Did they actually have some hint of life to them that remains unchecked that symbolizes their being the sons of God?

And what for you Cthulhu Dreaming, when it comes to the year 2000 and the coming of the turn of the century, it makes truly debatable sense that you would not actually see the sons of God rise again. We hear talk of the anti-christ, of war, of whatever, but we do not often hear that because it is the year 2000 that it is the turn of the tide for the sons of God and the family of God at that. We just don't hear it because it is just not discussed.

But because it makes debatable sense I will leave it at that. And I will state a bit further. Why is it that the sons of God remain outside of conversation in the year 2000? Well, this is the year of the arrival of the family of God, that much is certain. And when the family of God is anywhere directly mentioned, everybody pays attention.

That's something to think about.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz