(October 20, 2015 at 11:01 am)Losty Wrote:

(October 20, 2015 at 10:50 am)houseofcantor Wrote: Personal foul. Fifteen yards. Trump is never justifiable.

His facial reaction is perfect for everything jk says. Oh fine, I'll go back to the salad gif, fun sucker.

Fun sucker. Does that make me a sparkly vampire?

(October 19, 2015 at 11:03 am)JBrentonK Wrote: The title of this thread may sound weird, but that's my intention with this thread. I am going to ask you peeps that question. So without further ado, give me proof of your claim that you are an atheist, proof that you can believe in no God, proof that you are not just basing your opinion on dust, or dirt, or soot. Proof that you are an atheist too.... Because I don't believe that your "atheism" was not created by human eyes, human ears, human stupidity.... I believe, to the contrary, that your atheism was created around the 1900's, that it's a new upstart to the world of "fiction"; that you have never been more than a disbeliever.....

I believe that you do not believe in God, can not be contributive, cannot base your beliefs on your acts and can not act positively as a result. You cannot give to charity (or at least I wouldn't want you to), you cannot base your beliefs on the faith in your beliefs which beg for your positive contribution to the world. The world begs you for love.   Give it or else!

I also believe that you are not an atheist, however, and this thread will prove weather I am right or wrong. Are you an atheist? Or are you just coming to that conclusion due to some sorting out of the theories? Well, the good news is, if I'm right, and there is no proof for atheism (and all of it's bad fundamentalisms), you can still be a valuable part of your beliefs. All you'd have to do is act them, and then again, that is all you'd be forced to do. To start being contributive. To start a conversation and contribute to it's positive gain, to converse with friends or neighbors and be an actual, productive citizen during the process....

So, are you an atheist, or do you just believe that you are?

No, it's impossible for me to prove that I disbelieve in God.  There's no mind reading technology.  Just as you can't prove you're a Christian.

Quote:If you embrace God, you can "act" God. If you don't embrace God, you are like the atheists of this forum that demand you to prove god based on "evidence." It is evidence of God when you act him out in your life, and therefore you are open to an infinite possibility.

Translation: you'll see it when you believe it.

Other volumes in the series:

-You'll know The Truth™ when you're dead
-You'll see fairies once your brain is removed
-You can fly with this magic nose powder

Collect 'em all!

What me to prove I don't believe in your. Okay
You god is a vile piece of shit and I am very thankful he is not real.
Why does that constitute proof? Because I was I lying about being an atheist and was secretly Christian I just condemned myself to hell by committing the unforgivable sin.

Well coming from you houseofcantor I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "atheist".

The same thing for miss mafia. I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "agnostic."

There is no surprise about theism, however. All God is, is a credible position. And this is also the true position by definition.

As far as acting like an agnostic goes, you cannot act like an agnostic, because you're in a perpetual state of belief/non-belief. This dis-proves your opinion mafia lady.

As far as acting like an atheist goes, you cannot act like an atheist, because an atheist bases his position on nothing.

The simplest bullshit in the world from you fellows, and the simplest of responses.

And before i forget the burden of proof is not on the person(s) who don't believe in a god. The burden of proving a god exists is on the person(s) who is making the claim I.E. theists.

(October 20, 2015 at 11:05 am)JBrentonK Wrote: Well coming from you houseofcantor I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "atheist".

The same thing for miss mafia. I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "agnostic."

There is no surprise about theism, however. All God is, is a credible position. And this is also the true position by definition.

As far as acting like an agnostic goes, you cannot act like an agnostic, because you're in a perpetual state of belief/non-belief. This dis-proves your opinion mafia lady.

As far as acting like an atheist goes, you cannot act like an atheist, because an atheist bases his position on nothing.

The simplest bullshit in the world from you fellows, and the simplest of responses.

... And I'd be surprised if you are not a poe/troll+sock

(October 20, 2015 at 11:05 am)JBrentonK Wrote: Well coming from you houseofcantor I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "atheist".

The same thing for miss mafia. I'd be genuinely surprised if there is a word "agnostic."

There is no surprise about theism, however. All God is, is a credible position. And this is also the true position by definition.

As far as acting like an agnostic goes, you cannot act like an agnostic, because you're in a perpetual state of belief/non-belief. This dis-proves your opinion mafia lady.

As far as acting like an atheist goes, you cannot act like an atheist, because an atheist bases his position on nothing.

The simplest bullshit in the world from you fellows, and the simplest of responses.

Agnosticism has nothing to do with belief/non-belief. It concerns itself with knowledge claims.

Atheism needs to base itself on nothing more than a lack of good evidence that there is a god of any sort. And you continue, through your inability to provide such evidence, to give us all the reason we need on which to base our non-belief.

(October 19, 2015 at 11:03 am)JBrentonK Wrote: proof that you can believe in no God,.

Until you quit straw manning the argument, go fuck yourself. Come back whe you understand that the common use of the word today means a lack of belief in gawd(s), not a claim that there are none.

Dood. All you're saying is affirmation of the majority position as if that's some great undiscovered truth. Never mind the depreciated perspective of animus. If you weren't as arrogant as a murder of crows we might have a discussion. As it is you'd rather waft in the fragrance of your own effluvia.