(November 2, 2015 at 4:39 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: [/url]
[url=http://atheistforums.org/user-2972.html]RaphielDrake


The latter. This is a possibility that Muslims believe in.
It gives me the creeps when I see atheists accusing believers in God as "mad and crazy"; since it's a very logical possibility.

There is a difference between a possibility and a reality. You have people dying killing themselves and others over a possibility. That is mad and crazy. If hearing about yourself gives you the creeps, the simplest solution for you is to not come here.

atl-ass Wrote:Not exactly. "some" religious people think that, forgetting that their governments (and them included) might've committed more crimes than the American regimes.
And actually mama America brought her own doom to itself; you don't read economical news ? that's what you get for printing fake money anyhow

How did we go from natural disasters to printing money? Do you really think the people who are hit by hurricanes and snow blizzards are the same people who print fake money? And you read this somewhere? Where? In a supermarket tabloid?

(November 2, 2015 at 4:45 am)Irrational Wrote:

(November 2, 2015 at 4:39 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: [/url]
[url=http://atheistforums.org/user-6118.html]Irrational

That applies on atheists too : why immediately jump to the option of no God being present in the equation ?

It's the default option. Until you present clear evidence for the existence of God, atheism is the reasonable option to go with.
Keep in mind that atheism means lack of belief in God, not the belief that no God exists.

In truth, as I have said elsewhere, if god existed in any meaningful way, humans would not have to present evidence. Hid presence would be its own evidence.

(November 2, 2015 at 11:15 am)Rhondazvous Wrote:

(November 2, 2015 at 4:45 am)Irrational Wrote: It's the default option. Until you present clear evidence for the existence of God, atheism is the reasonable option to go with.
Keep in mind that atheism means lack of belief in God, not the belief that no God exists.

In truth, as I have said elsewhere, if god existed in any meaningful way, humans  would not have to present evidence. Hid presence would be its own evidence.

Strongly agree. I mean, we're fucking talking about GOD here, not some measly unicorn or dragon.

(November 2, 2015 at 4:39 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: You neglected the possibility that God is not a "thing".
We are "things". God is not even a "thing".

(Sura 6 Verse 103 )   Vision perceives Him not, but He perceives [all] vision; and He is the Subtle, the Acquainted.

(Sura 42 11 )   [He is] Creator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for you from yourselves, mates, and among the cattle, mates; He multiplies you thereby. There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing.

In other words we apply the word "things" on anything that is not him.

Three things.


1. That is ALL a pile of word salad. You are now just digging into semantics in an attempt to redefine Gaud as "not a thing" to buy yourself another post or so while you think you've dodged my argument.


2. The verses you've posted do not contain justification for the assertion that Gaud is "not a thing." They make some vague statements about Allah's vague qualities and that's about it.


3. Even if we decide to call Gaud something else (an entity, an object, a force, a being, or whatever), it still leaves you with the problem that if he is the only element of reality that does not have be the product of an action, that is special pleading and you just lost.

(November 2, 2015 at 1:41 pm)Irrational Wrote:

(November 2, 2015 at 11:15 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: In truth, as I have said elsewhere, if god existed in any meaningful way, humans  would not have to present evidence. Hid presence would be its own evidence.

Strongly agree. I mean, we're fucking talking about GOD here, not some measly unicorn or dragon.

Listening to Christians and Muslims, sounds more like we're talking about some low-level regional manager.

(November 2, 2015 at 9:48 am)robvalue Wrote: Err...

OK, so he's a dictator but you don't call him a dictator. It's only fair to warn you that you sound like a totally broken person trying to justify the atrocities your cruel master is inflicting upon you. Just some outside perspective, as I'm concerned for you. (See Stockholm Syndrome.) The fact that this master doesn't exist (or at least not the way you imagine it) makes it even more sad.

There's no evidence any of this stuff you say is true, so why you'd actually want it to be true is beyond me. And since your master isn't here, it's you threatening me with all this stuff. Obey or pay. Does that bother you, that you're openly threatening strangers on a forum? And you're doing so for your own gain, to try and earn points.

And it's you telling me what God wants, too. How am I meant to distinguish between what you say and the different stuff every other theist comes to me with? None of you have any evidence, and you're clearly not in contact with the same being. If you are, your communication lines are extremely poor quality.

What do you mean "doing" what he wants is a fact? Do you mean I'm doing it whether I like it or not? Whatever I do, that's what he wants?

He needs to get an Xbox and stop using real beings in his weird games.

Actually, no matter how I try, you'll never believe unless you were meant to believe.

Threatening is a word I don't prefer; "warning" is the true meaning of what I say. That's warning, just like warning people of an upcoming disaster.

Again rob, obey or pay is a warning, not a threat. I told you, that warning includes me. If you don't want me to broadcast it, you will find it in any near library selling Qurans.

It's not that I want it to be true; it's that I measured every evidence I have and my conclusion is that it has to be true.
What you would say next is probably : "bring that punishment if you can !". Well, I don't know when it will take place, but I'm believe it's coming. God will bring it down anytime he wishes.


A member here in this topic (Rhondazvous) said :

Quote: In truth, as I have said elsewhere, if god existed in any meaningful way, humans would not have to present evidence. Hid presence would be its own evidence.

His existence and the right path to him, speak for themselves.

About this line which I wrote :

Quote: In terms of "doing" what he wants only; that's a fact. It's a rule of the universe anyhow.

Our creation is a fact; he wanted it.
He gave us free will and freedom to do whatever we want on this, because he wanted that; and only he.

What he wants, becomes a rule of the universe.

What he wants to be, becomes.

robvalue

Quote:The default position for any claim should be a lack of belief. Otherwise, you believe everything you are told that can't immediately be proved wrong. Which is preferable?

The claim, "There is a god" should be treated with disbelief by default. As no evidence has yet emerged that the claim is true, continued disbelief is the logical position.

The claim "There is no god" should also be treated with disbelief by default. This puts you in the position of weak atheism when combined with the above.

Some may consider that the extraordinary nature of god, how it doesn't correlate at all with reality we observe, and how there is absolutely no evidence where you would expect to find it, to be enough to believe this second claim. Then you're in the position of strong atheism.

Some may say the concept is so ill-defined that statements about it are essentially meaningless (ignostic).

You're probably a strong atheist with respect to the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It's no different.

The problem is in the "evidence". As a believer, I think the evidence is very strong on the existence of one God; again I did say that on AF for about..2 years now ?

The universe speaks of its origin, our bodies, our earth, everything.
If you can't see it, I can see it.

But on creation, being met with a "lack of belief" by default ? the evidence is too strong for me, for "lack of belief" to be the default. To me, I can understand lack of belief being a default when we speak about the concept of "multiple Gods" .

Abaris

Quote: a humanocentric, geocentric creator doesn't fit into that picture.

? humans and earth, are two of his creations.

The Quran made it clear that we know nothing but a fraction of what he created.

Take this verse for example :

( Sura 16 Verse 8 )   And [He created] the horses, mules and donkeys for you to ride and [as] adornment. And He creates that which you do not know.

Rhondazvous

Quote:How did we go from natural disasters to printing money? Do you really think the people who are hit by hurricanes and snow blizzards are the same people who print fake money? And you read this somewhere? Where? In a supermarket tabloid?

?
What I said was clear; the U.S regime is bringing its own end by playing dirty games such as printing fake money and killing thousands for oil (like a parasite). I don't think a disaster is needed, the regime is killing itself.

Redbeard The Pink

Quote: 1. That is ALL a pile of word salad. You are now just digging into semantics in an attempt to redefine Gaud as "not a thing" to buy yourself another post or so while you think you've dodged my argument.

No, actually by quoting the Quran it means quoting what I think God is saying about your argument

Quote: 2. The verses you've posted do not contain justification for the assertion that Gaud is "not a thing." They make some vague statements about Allah's vague qualities and that's about it.

So, you see the word "There is nothing like unto Him", as him being a thing ?
Even the word "thing" can't apply to him according that verse.

Quote: 3. Even if we decide to call Gaud something else (an entity, an object, a force, a being, or whatever), it still leaves you with the problem that if he is the only element of reality that does not have be the product of an action, that is special pleading and you just lost.

I don't think so. It's not like you gave an evidence that convinced me.

(November 2, 2015 at 6:28 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Actually, no matter how I try, you'll never believe unless you were meant to believe.

So then you agree that it's a complete waste of time for you to come here and vomit your unsubstantiated bullshit.

You've now resorted to the "it's true because I'm special" defense. Such a pretty snowflake.

(November 2, 2015 at 6:40 pm)Cato Wrote:

(November 2, 2015 at 6:28 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Actually, no matter how I try, you'll never believe unless you were meant to believe.

So then you agree that it's a complete waste of time for you to come here and vomit your unsubstantiated bullshit.

You've now resorted to the "it's true because I'm special" defense. Such a pretty snowflake.

It depends on your understanding of the word "meant", and "fate".
Despite God knowledge of the future, he is just. Actually, we decide our own fate through our actions.

If somebody did not believe, it's because of their actions. And the more they commit fatal flaws, the more they disbelieve.  God will not grant them guidance unless they act and think in the right direction.

What I do is just carrying the candle.