That is an excellent position to take.

Jesus says love..?

Tell that to the victims of Helen Upkabio's literal witch hunt in sub-Saharan Africa, the hundreds of children murdered, tortured, maimed or abandoned to die by their own families in the sick name of Christianity. Then find a mirror, look yourself in the eye and tell yourself that.

(November 23, 2015 at 7:21 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: He's probably a vertical crusherist.

Exactly my thoughts.

(November 23, 2015 at 8:25 am)robvalue Wrote: Islamic texts are backwards, ignorant and violent. Just like Christian texts.

Muslims, on the other hand, are free to interpret the texts any way they like. If they interpret them literally and live by those principles, then they will be backwards, ignorant and violent. Same with Christians. Or they can cherry pick/interpret and be decent people, like many do.

Out of all the religions, surely you can agree that Islam is the worst (at least most violent)

---

(November 23, 2015 at 9:03 am)Pandæmonium Wrote:

(November 23, 2015 at 7:21 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: He's probably a vertical crusherist.

Exactly my thoughts.

Don't know what "vertical crusherist" is. To be plain, I'm a follower of the Hyperborran Theory of Evola's Fascism. Basically Far right Ultra-Conservative traditionalism with support for National Socialism.

Oh I don't care. ^_^

Nazi god lover? No problem! But vertical (*) crusherism? HE MUST DIIIIIIIIEEEEEE!


(*) or was it horizontal?

(November 23, 2015 at 7:21 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: He's probably a vertical crusherist.

'Shaddam Wrote:To be plain, I'm a follower of the Hyperborran Theory of

Hyperborran, eh? You may be a fascist, but a spelling Nazi, you ain't.

All crusherists are vermin!

(November 23, 2015 at 9:04 am)Shaddam IV Wrote: Don't know what "vertical crusherist" is. To be plain, I'm a follower of the Hyperborran Theory of Evola's Fascism. Basically Far right Ultra-Conservative traditionalism with support for National Socialism.

Mornin fuckwit, how goes the trolling? I have a question for you. It is a very important question and I suggest you think carefully before answering it. If you had the social skills of a rock would you rather be crushed vertically or horizontally? (I think we all realize this is not a hypothetical question.)

I'm trying to figure out whether vertical rock crushers are actually more complicated than they need to be. You're making use of gravity instead of a conveyor belt, which means that the timing of the transport of rocks travelling downwards is less predictable. And you don't save any energy saving over having a conveyor belt because you have to lift the rock up to begin with. With a horizontal rock crusher you could chain multiple ones together if you wanted to crush the rock into smaller sizes. You couldn't do that so easily with a vertical one.

On the other hand a vertical rock crusher would save space if it was limited. But when is that ever really an issue outdoors? I'm still trying to figure out why they were using that horizontal crusher in Germany last week that I apparently didn't see.