I'll respond to points made as I would with anyone else.

I haven't flamed and I certainly haven't called out anyone.

The discussion I've engaged in is relevant to the thread.

Not responding to a "problem" just allows that problem to fester.

Take it from a quack.

(December 3, 2015 at 8:44 pm)DespondentFishdeathMasochismo Wrote: Beccs

Quote:Awwww, my "pet" ideology.

Isn't that a cute way of trying to belittle my opinion?  What next, will you say, "be a nice girl and run along"?

No

Quote:Belittling doesn't work with me.  I just respond in a much more direct way.

No

Quote:Personally, I've never heard of this woman you're referring to.

No

Quote:And yes, my response IS relevant to your commentary.

No 

Quote:You're addressing ONE part of feminism while ignoring the rest.

No

Quote:I could address the pathetic losers who call themselves "incels", who basically hate women and blame them because they can't get laid, and equate them to the entire male gender, the way you're doing with extreme feminists.

Why would you address something irrelevant to what I'm talking about? That would waste both of our time.

Quote:But I don't like to do that as it's unfair to the majority

No

Now, go back and answer properly.

The reiteration is getting really boring.

-This is feminism

Not what I consider feminism

- Feminists are like this

I'm a feminist. I'm not like that

- Some feminists are

Some doesn't represent all

-You may not be this way but this is feminism

Not how I define feminism

Repeat X 1 million

I disagree with your generalization of feminists.
You disagree with my definition of feminism.

I'm all for agreeing to disagree.

I just wanted to try it, sorry.     

Is that an admission of trolling?

(December 3, 2015 at 8:52 pm)Beccs Wrote: Is that an admission of trolling?

You wish. I was literally hoping and praying that just saying no would absolve the problem. But it still persists. Please don't interpret everything as trolling, I was just playing around.

My 2 cents to this discussion: I'm a feminist. Don't like it? Go cram it up your arse.

(December 3, 2015 at 8:54 pm)DespondentFishdeathMasochismo Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 8:52 pm)Beccs Wrote: Is that an admission of trolling?

You wish. I was literally hoping and praying that just saying no would absolve the problem. But it still persists. Please don't interpret everything as trolling, I was just playing around.

Look into a mirror.

Concentrate on the reflection looking back at you.

There's the problem.

Is it still looking back at you?

If yes, then the problem is still there.

(December 3, 2015 at 8:56 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 8:54 pm)DespondentFishdeathMasochismo Wrote: You wish. I was literally hoping and praying that just saying no would absolve the problem. But it still persists. Please don't interpret everything as trolling, I was just playing around.

Look into a mirror.

Concentrate on the reflection looking back at you.

There's the problem.

Is it still looking back at you?

If yes, then the problem is still there.

Astounding tales of redundancy

(December 3, 2015 at 9:00 pm)DespondentFishdeathMasochismo Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 8:56 pm)Beccs Wrote: Look into a mirror.

Concentrate on the reflection looking back at you.

There's the problem.

Is it still looking back at you?

If yes, then the problem is still there.

Astounding tales of redundancy

Remarkable levels of deceit.