(February 8, 2016 at 1:44 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(February 8, 2016 at 12:53 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: So may I ask you, what the hell are -YOU- going to do without us ? without oil that is being extracted out of OUR Muslim Arab lands ? to keep your DOLLAR alive ?

Buy from Canada, develop alternative resources, and tell the Middle East to go fuck itself with a cactus.

For the record, I was against the war in Iraq, and I'm against any intervention anywhere in that region. I regard our aid to Israel as a form of intervention, too -- eliminate it.

If the population over there is comfortable with people killing each other over whose imaginary friend is real, great -- you fucking clean up your own mess.

There's not one square foot of land in that fucking ashtray that is worth one drop of American blood.

cactus don't grow in Arabia.
Get off your high horse, and realize that the U.S has destroyed the Middle East with its intervention. 

No, you will not be able to get the same amount of oil from Canada; the standard you see today existed only after the oil evolution post WW2, and the deal Nixon made with King Faisal -Saudi Arabia-. That is the only thing that made the Dollar so strong. Without that, America wouldn't have became what it is, go as the experts.





RIP, Ruppert.  No, if the Middle East got dry, the whole world -not just America- will fall.
The U.S had destroyed the world when it replaced gold with Oil, I'm inclined to say Nixon, but nobody fixed what he did, right ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock

it's just sad, to see that these are forgotten. It's even more sad, to demand me to bring an evidence from the robber, about him robbing the goods of others. 
But no. I'm sorry, but no. If the Middle East is dry, America as we know it today will fall. I know your brain is programmed to think otherwise, but please read history.

I'm not saying "Americans" are robbing us. Though there are certain people, who infected your governemnt (like Nixon), and didn't just rob Arabs; they robbed the world. 
Can you understand what it means, to cancel gold as an exchange for the currency, and replace it with oil ?

If you think I'm with the Arab governments, or I'm a nationalist, poor you is so mistaken. Nixon's sin is being protected by the Arab regimes after all. But the mainstream will always keep their heads inside their big macs, ; living the dream.

You will wake up when it all falls down.
Nothing serious replaced fossil fuel, and saying Canada will replace what countries like Saudi Arabia used to produce, is just ignorant and insulting to our brains.

When oil is dry, and the only remaining sources are so scarce, wait for the bomb..you know what I mean. Nuclear winter.

watch the video at 5:49 , so, is Canada's oil enough to keep the world going the way it is ? you're not serious, right ?

(February 8, 2016 at 3:48 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You don't see the dorsal bump?

I didn't notice anything that looked like it needs surgery.

Quote:He's just going to straighten it and make it a little smaller too. But thank you! 

I think you are just to critical of yourself. I guarantee you that nobody else would see a need to cut that nose.

I think that it takes a particularly whimsical person to simultaneously decry american propaganda while quoting Dick Cheney as an authority in support of their argument.  

The oil running dry (or the US moving past) would be the worst imaginable scenario...but not for the US.  For your arab nations.  It would represent the second time in recorded history that they let the entire world run through their fingers like sand. Life in the US will go on pursuing it's comfortable standards, oblivious to the plight of a people who no longer have a product to sell. The desolation of the middle east would persist for the -next- thousand years, or until another opportunity like oil were discovered. Here's to hoping they don't squander it the next time, like last time....and the time before that.........

I find it kind of amusing, personally, you think you want the US to leave you alone, in the collective sense, but it's clear that you couldn't survive it.

So many first world problems.

(February 8, 2016 at 6:22 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote: So many first world problems.

It's better than third world problems.

(February 8, 2016 at 7:24 pm)KUSA Wrote: It's better than third world problems.

Give it another decade or two of continued corporate bootlicking and we're there.

(February 8, 2016 at 7:24 pm)KUSA Wrote:

(February 8, 2016 at 6:22 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote: So many first world problems.

It's better than third world problems.

But more whiney.

(February 8, 2016 at 7:49 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote:

(February 8, 2016 at 7:24 pm)KUSA Wrote: It's better than third world problems.

But more whiney.

How so?

What would make you whine more?

A. You live in the US in a nice modern house with all the conveniences and without notice, your cable goes out.

B. You live in Africa in a mud hut eating bugs and shit you found under a rotten log. All of a sudden, it starts raining and your mud hut falls on you.

You don't know what "first world problems" are, do you?