(February 26, 2016 at 11:04 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(February 26, 2016 at 11:00 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: CL, is flushing your poop morally good?

Oh yes, it is very considerate. Sometimes I am naughty and purposely don't flush it to prank my unsuspecting husband. 

How do you know it is morally good?

OK thanks for your answer CL

I didn't understand it, but I appreciate it nonetheless. Words like "spiritual" don't mean anything to me. I don't understand how morality is anything other than a judgement. I really don't know what you actually think it is.

And thank you for your kind words I agree that psychopaths are problematic, and getting them to fit in with society is difficult. This is the one case in which I think religion has half a leg to stand on, but I still think there are better ways.

(February 26, 2016 at 11:04 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(February 26, 2016 at 11:00 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: CL, is flushing your poop morally good?

Oh yes, it is very considerate. Sometimes I am naughty and purposely don't flush it to prank my unsuspecting husband. 

You could just cook with it.

King James Bible Ezekiel 4:12
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight

(February 26, 2016 at 10:13 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Slavery has and always will be evil because it is an objectively, inherently evil act. Because it takes away the inherent right a human being has.

This is all so horribly wrong. Other than in the mind of man or God, what is evil about slavery, objective or otherwise? Does it piss off the birds? The rocks? The universe? Do the stars cry for slaves, or black holes? Does slavery affect gravity, chemical bonds, or the resolution of wave functions?

Nah. The Christian definition of "objective" is just "things I feel extra strongly about." But, dontcha see, that's exactly the definition of SUB-jective?

Exactly. Universe state A becomes universe state B. How do you tell which is "better" without appealing to some sort of point of view? Until you do, it's all just a bunch of stuff.

It takes away the inherent right of another human being.

What if we genetically engineered a sub group of humans that truly wanted to be slaves?

(February 26, 2016 at 11:19 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: It takes away the inherent right of another human being.

And what effect does it have on nature or the universe or pretty much anything outside human civilisation?

(February 26, 2016 at 11:21 am)KUSA Wrote: What if we genetically engineered a sub group of humans that truly wanted to be slaves?

Then your ethical standards would be up for review.

(February 26, 2016 at 11:22 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:

(February 26, 2016 at 11:21 am)KUSA Wrote: What if we genetically engineered a sub group of humans that truly wanted to be slaves?

Then your ethical standards would be up for review.

Are your ethics objective or subjective?