(March 5, 2016 at 10:15 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, i see.  
Well in this case you should be able to tell me what is the relationship between energy
and consciousness.  

Maybe ask an expert on that? I mean, seriously, there are people who understand stuff and others filling everything they don't know with woo. Just like the caveman sitting in front of his home and calling the moon and stars god.

You, most certainly, fall into the latter category.

(March 6, 2016 at 8:45 am)abaris Wrote:

(March 5, 2016 at 10:15 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, i see.  
Well in this case you should be able to tell me what is the relationship between energy
and consciousness.  

Maybe ask an expert on that? I mean, seriously, there are people who understand stuff and others filling everything they don't know with woo. Just like the caveman sitting in front of his home and calling the moon and stars god.
You, most certainly, fall into the latter category.

If i wouldn't know the answer why then i would ask and test atheists about it?
Oh, i see.
You think i am bluffing, do you?  
Actually i am not a gambler but if you think otherwise just put your cards on the table
and i put mine and let us see who turn up as the winner.
You never thought about it aba, did you?  

(March 5, 2016 at 10:15 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(March 5, 2016 at 9:53 am)Nymphadora Wrote: I'll teach you English, but you'll never be able to teach anyone how the whole universal system works because you don't understand it yourself.

Oh, i see.
Well in this case you should be able to tell me what is the relationship between energy
and consciousness.  

I already gave you an example. Moving on to your English lesson.

When you use the letter "I" in a sentence, you are referring to yourself in the first person. It always gets capitalized, no matter where it occurs in that sentence.

(March 6, 2016 at 9:21 am)Nymphadora Wrote:

(March 5, 2016 at 10:15 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, i see.
Well in this case you should be able to tell me what is the relationship between energy
and consciousness.  

I already gave you an example.

Did you?  
That is something new to me.
Would you be so kind to show me where your example is?  

Quote:Moving on to your English lesson.  
When you use the letter "I" in a sentence, you are referring to yourself in the first person. It always gets capitalized, no matter where it occurs in that sentence.

Gee, I never thought about it Nympha.
Thanks a lot.  

(March 6, 2016 at 9:10 am)Little Rik Wrote: If i wouldn't know the answer why then i would ask and test atheists about it?
Oh, i see.
You think i am bluffing, do you?  
Actually i am not a gambler but if you think otherwise just put your cards on the table
and i put mine and let us see who turn up as the winner.
You never thought about it aba, did you?  

Excuse me, great one. I diidn't recognize you as a scientist heading for the noble price, since he has all the answers already.

(March 6, 2016 at 8:13 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(March 5, 2016 at 11:17 am)little_monkey Wrote: You're little short on history: "If the guess lead to something then why not." That's what billions of people have been doing for thousands of years, "guessing". And the results is hundreds of religions scattered throughout the planet, not counting the hundreds of religions who have disappeared in that time interval. It's only in the last 500 years, that certain people were able to get out of that nightmare of "guessing", and it's called the scientific method in which "guessing" must be verified rigidly with empirical evidence. And from there developed the technology we all enjoy. Take away science and you get no electricity in your home, notwithstanding all the stuff working with electricity - radio, TV, computer, the internet, to name a few. You would be reading by candle light, and forget going to the hospital as no medical equipment such as MRI, x-ray or even the notion of taking your blood test to see what virus invaded your body. In those days, if you were sick, they thought they could cure you by bleeding you. 

BTW, atheism means there is lack of evidence in the existence of a god. Anything else is not atheism. An atheist can believe in voodooism, vampirism, satanism, whatever, it's not a reflection on atheism. The only thing that all atheists shared is lack of evidence in the existence of a god.  If you want to attack atheists then the the only way to go is to show there is an abundance of evidence for the existence of a god. Any other attack is like shooting in the dark.

I got bad news for you L.monkey.  
1) If you would present a doctoral thesis along these lines talking into account what i already write you would not pass.  
The fire can burn you but at the same can provide warm, can cook your meals and a lot of other things.

In case you don't know, and I guess you don't know is that this was found out way back in the 17th century by people who called themselves scientists. So what you claim as your own proper idea is something verified scientifically hundreds of years before you were born. Sorry, but keep demonstrating how ignorant you are, you're doing a fine. But worse is that you are completely dishonest, and as such I am terminating my conversation with you. YOU are a total waste.


 



[/quote]

This thread has given me ideas for new categories for our annual awards:

-Most Brain-Numbingly Repetitive Poster

-Most Wrong Points Presented In A Single Post

-Member Who Most Consistently Misrepresents What Science is/does.

-Most Consistent Mischaracterization of Atheists/Atheism.

-Member Whose Posts Generate The Greatest Number Of Cat Memes From Other Members.

Boru

(March 6, 2016 at 10:22 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: This thread has given me ideas for new categories for our annual awards:

-Most Brain-Numbingly Repetitive Poster

-Most Wrong Points Presented In A Single Post

-Member Who Most Consistently Misrepresents What Science is/does.

-Most Consistent Mischaracterization of Atheists/Atheism.

-Member Whose Posts Generate The Greatest Number Of Cat Memes From Other Members.
Boru

This thread has given me ideas for new categories for MY annual awards  

Members Who Most Consistently fail to explain what philosophy is all about, what evolution is all about,
what is the differences among brain, mind and consciousness, what is the relationship between energy and consciousness and so on and on.

Members Who Most Consistently change argument when ask to explain the above issues.

Members Who Most Consistently turn to mocking in order to mask their ignorance.

(March 6, 2016 at 10:22 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: This thread has given me ideas for new categories for our annual awards:

-Most Brain-Numbingly Repetitive Poster

-Most Wrong Points Presented In A Single Post

-Member Who Most Consistently Misrepresents What Science is/does.

-Most Consistent Mischaracterization of Atheists/Atheism.

-Member Whose Posts Generate The Greatest Number Of Cat Memes From Other Members.

Boru

No fair! We wouldn't stand a chance!