You consider BBC less reliable than RT?

(March 3, 2016 at 12:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: You consider BBC less reliable than RT?

Yes.

(March 3, 2016 at 1:33 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 12:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: You consider BBC less reliable than RT?

Yes.

Why?

(March 3, 2016 at 1:37 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 1:33 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Yes.

Why?

Because Derp? That's the only reason I can think of why anybody would consider a blatant neo-fascist propaganda station to be more reliable than the longest established independent news source in the world.

(March 3, 2016 at 5:39 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 1:37 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Why?

Because Derp? That's the only reason I can think of why anybody would consider a blatant neo-fascist propaganda station to be more reliable than the longest established independent news source in the world.

"Independent"

Yeah, it's no more independent than RT. Anyway this thread isn't about the fucking debating of news sources. A child died.

Go fuck off and make another thread for that.

(March 3, 2016 at 6:44 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: "Independent"

Yeah, it's no more independent than RT. Anyway this thread isn't about the fucking debating of news sources. A child died.

Go fuck off and make another thread for that.

Oh, the artificial outrage. As if the Independent was the only source I posted and as if every child dying in the world would be of any concern to you. The toddler getting shot in the USA these days, was equally important to you. Oh wait, it wasn't. That was min posting the story.

It's just that you hoped for some juicy islamistic murder and it turned out just to be an ordinary crime by a deranged person.

I guess you know that RT is the voice of Putin. If you don't, read up on it's ownership. Also, today, when there's actually something to report, the web is full of the story. Can't expect you to do your own research now, can we?

(March 3, 2016 at 7:07 pm)abaris Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 6:44 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: "Independent"

Yeah, it's no more independent than RT. Anyway this thread isn't about the fucking debating of news sources. A child died.

Go fuck off and make another thread for that.

Oh, the artificial outrage. As if the Independent was the only source I posted and as if every child dying in the world would be of any concern to you. The toddler getting shot in the USA these days, was equally important to you. Oh wait, it wasn't. That was min posting the story.

It's just that you hoped for some juicy islamistic murder and it turned out just to be an ordinary crime by a deranged person.

I guess you know that RT is the voice of Putin. If you don't, read up on it's ownership. Also, today, when there's actually something to report, the web is full of the story. Can't expect you to do your own research now, can we?

Your chest-beating is for a victory which only you seem to believe happened. I don't think most people give two shits whether that disgusting crime was done as an organized jihad attack or not, nor should they. The fact remains that one very crazy person got a whole lot more crazy with the goading of Islamic jihadist ideas. Had she not been Muslim, she may have not actually done anything so evil.

(March 3, 2016 at 1:33 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 12:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: You consider BBC less reliable than RT?

Yes.

Lol.

Wut? Come on, you're yanking our chain surely? Putin's mouthpiece is more reliable than the BBC?

Let's not forget Corbyn and Galloway have appeared on RT, so you know something's wrong immediately.

(March 3, 2016 at 10:08 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 7:07 pm)abaris Wrote: Oh, the artificial outrage. As if the Independent was the only source I posted and as if every child dying in the world would be of any concern to you. The toddler getting shot in the USA these days, was equally important to you. Oh wait, it wasn't. That was min posting the story.

It's just that you hoped for some juicy islamistic murder and it turned out just to be an ordinary crime by a deranged person.

I guess you know that RT is the voice of Putin. If you don't, read up on it's ownership. Also, today, when there's actually something to report, the web is full of the story. Can't expect you to do your own research now, can we?

Your chest-beating is for a victory which only you seem to believe happened. I don't think most people give two shits whether that disgusting crime was done as an organized jihad attack or not, nor should they. The fact remains that one very crazy person got a whole lot more crazy with the goading of Islamic jihadist ideas. Had she not been Muslim, she may have not actually done anything so evil.

The Saudis would behead her.

(March 8, 2016 at 3:19 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:

(March 3, 2016 at 10:08 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Your chest-beating is for a victory which only you seem to believe happened. I don't think most people give two shits whether that disgusting crime was done as an organized jihad attack or not, nor should they. The fact remains that one very crazy person got a whole lot more crazy with the goading of Islamic jihadist ideas. Had she not been Muslim, she may have not actually done anything so evil.

The Saudis would behead her.

For killing a Russian infidel girl? I doubt that much.