(March 9, 2016 at 9:45 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 7:50 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm unsure where you got the idea that I said that that was in Texas alone. Mind quoting and linking that alleged post?

In the future, perhaps you should read for comprehension, rather than out of defensiveness. The internet is no place for insecure folks.

The same applies in all of the other States. The Dems simply don't need additional Hispanic votes to win the Blue States as long as the current Dem votes vote for the Dem candidate.  Additional Hispanic voters in the Red States won't turn those States Blue.  And the Dems don't need to win any of the Red States to win the Presidency.  

I believe I asked you to link to a post where I said it was Texas only. Why do you lack the integrity to acknowledge your dishonest argumentation?

Quote:What additional Hispanic voters might be able to do as Dems in the Red States is to elect more Dems to State offices and to Congress.  They are irrelevant as far as the Presidential election is concerned.

Please learn how the Electoral College process work before you make further comments about the Presidential election.

I'm well aware of how it works, thankyouverymuch, Woggie. As I said earlier, no one knows, and that includes you.

Hopefully you will have noticed also that I didn't assert that it would tip the scales against Trump, but only that they were doing it to stiffen opposition to Trump. You're new to this reading stuff, aren't you?

I get it, you dislike the idea of non-Aryans voting. But fer chrissakes, kid, at least target the point being made. Doing otherwise only makes you look dumber ... no mean feat, that.

(March 9, 2016 at 9:50 pm)AFTT47 Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 9:01 pm)KUSA Wrote: Yes it is. She is a filthy CUNT!

You're a classless ASS!

And you are a brazen cum guzzling prick.

Are you bucking for a cabinet position in the Trump administration, K?  Seems like you are auditioning just like your fucking asshole hero does.

(March 9, 2016 at 10:20 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 9:45 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: The same applies in all of the other States. The Dems simply don't need additional Hispanic votes to win the Blue States as long as the current Dem votes vote for the Dem candidate.  Additional Hispanic voters in the Red States won't turn those States Blue.  And the Dems don't need to win any of the Red States to win the Presidency.  

I believe I asked you to link to a post where I said it was Texas only. Why do you lack the integrity to acknowledge your dishonest argumentation?

Quote:What additional Hispanic voters might be able to do as Dems in the Red States is to elect more Dems to State offices and to Congress.  They are irrelevant as far as the Presidential election is concerned.

Please learn how the Electoral College process work before you make further comments about the Presidential election.

I'm well aware of how it works, thankyouverymuch, Woggie.  As I said earlier, no one knows, and that includes you.

Hopefully you will have noticed also that I didn't assert that it would tip the scales against Trump, but only that they were doing it to stiffen opposition to Trump. You're new to this reading stuff, aren't you?

I get it, you dislike the idea of non-Aryans voting. But fer chrissakes, kid, at least target the point being made. Doing otherwise only makes you look dumber ... no mean feat, that.

Stiffen opposition?  Are you for real?  Do you really think that the Dems are going to win any Red States in November?  They'll be lucky to keep all of the Blue States with Trump running.  

Now get this through your thick skull:  The Dems don't need any of the Red States to win the Presidency if the Dems in the Blue States show up and vote for the Dem Candidate.  So it doesn't make a rat's ass difference how many Hispanics vote for the Dem candidate in the Red States.  That's because she/he can win without them.  They only matter if they vote for the Dems in the lower offices.  

Now on the flip side, the Repub candidate can get every single vote in all of the Red States and he will lose the election unless he wins a lot of the Blue States.  

So, as far as the Presidential election is concerned, the only voters that matter are the Dem voters in the Red States. They determine who will be the President.

Go back and reread what I wrote, Woggie. Focus on the part where I wrote "I don't know ... And you don't either."

Perhaps if you weren't so insecure you could see that there might be an overlap in our points. But as it is, you're so intent on being "right" that you're unable to even read coherently, by all appearances.

Take a deep breath, Little Buddy. It's only a discussion. You won't get a medal for valor, or a firing squad, no matter what happens.

(March 6, 2016 at 1:20 am)scoobysnack Wrote:

(March 5, 2016 at 9:12 pm)Sterben Wrote:         Let the people speak and what they say is honest according to a mob. If the group wants to believe that Trump is a honest man they will lead others to believe it without doing a bit of research on there own or using a critical thought process. Modern Republicans don't want to be the adult at the table, they are backwards and operate only with dollar signs; as does all politicians but, the Republicans are the worse and most greedy at it. People need to realize that Trump is only out for himself and his powerful financial friends. He cares nothing about your healthcare unless big business get's a cut. The minimum wage he does not care about since he does not want lower incomes moving into homes. I would not be shocked if he does win and he opens many new neighborhoods developed by others and his brand name is slapped all over it. Once the old tenants are kicked out and put into a Trump level one city to make his white business criminals friends to make a other golf course out of.

        If were going to beat him we have to stop attacking him from the front and flank him from the side. I wounder if he is hiding anything from the I.R.S? He likes to play with lawyers, so can we. I suggest that we has a country get a legal fund and stop him in court since he loves to sue. Get the Democrats and Republicans who don't like him to work together for once and derail him. Don't they read The Art of War, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." If we don't stop him now, we would be as irresponsible as a German knowing that Hitler is a bad man and does nothing to stop him.

Do you mean the Republican party or the part of the general population that votes republican?

I think Trump believes the country is going down the tubes and he wants to fix the problems, almost like an act of self preservation.

A canadian study by psychologists found liberals six times more likely to lie and steal.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/sherman-fre...eral-brain

By the way, why do you like communism or Lenin?

        When has a wealthy business man wanted to help others without a financial or PR gain? Do you think Bill Gates gives money cause he cares? or does he want to spread his foundation and improve his namesake? The answer is partial yes to he cares, and a big yes to spreading his name around. Look at Trump, he wants spread his Cancers venture capital style to every aspect of American life. If he was to put affordable housing he would smear his name all over it. "Live a affordable life style in a Trump community. In a Trump Community you get see my name everywhere you look; in your bathroom, your bedroom, and even your garage. While your at, look into getting a Trump car backed by a Trump affordable loan. Are you out of work? Well, I have that cover as well. You can earn a wage in your local Trump stores, hotels, or communities. Live Trump, Drive trump, and Work Trump remember Trump is a brand everyone can trust!" Liberals are less likely to steel large amounts, in the place of bulk theft they promote there own goals. Which can be good and bad, take for example Obama's climate issues. He wants to improve the condition the planet. As far as why I like Lenin, he is a hero to me. He and his family suffered the wrath of the Zhars, he championed a party and eliminated his enemy. When you brake it down communism is a near perfect system, it's human oppression that gives it a bad name. Capitalism has more flaws then communism. In communism a person who is a farmer is equal to the programmer, they both need each other and does not make one better then the other in anyway.


       It frees people from the very problems caused by capitalism. When a American business man can buy the rights to a body of water in a country that he does not live in for profit. That is wrong on so many levels, that it's quite sicking that American businesses puts a price tag on everything. Not everything should be for sale. It should be that you can buy a percentage of certain materials, if you buy the rights to the entire mine your being greedy. If you buy 20 or 40% of the mine, you can work together with the other share holders. Instead of a company getting rich, a lot of companies could get rich together spreading it around is fair and hogging the entire mine to just your company is being greedy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOkRCR40sqU
http://lyricstranslate.com/en/bari-aragi...z42T16qpgN

i have a station, i have an inn (lodge),
Free Homeland, blissful land,
blissful, blissful land.
well Strok, kind Strok,
Strok of spring, Strok of summer,
live close to my house, Strok of destiny
Weave a nest on the tree's
hard (harsh) tops (pinacle).
Let the Strok to sing with me
relaxing and on tops
lands, vineyards, Purprle country
violet, violet country
well Strok, kind Strok,
Strok of spring, Strok of summer,
live close to my house, Strok of destiny
Weave a nest on the tree's
hard (harsh) tops (pinacle).

(March 9, 2016 at 11:01 pm)Sterben Wrote: In communism a person who is a farmer is equal to the programmer, they both need each other and does not make one better then the other in anyway.

That is a flawed system. They should not be on the same level. Although being a farmer is an important job, it doesn't take a very large skill set to do it. Therefore, most people can easily learn to do it.

The programming job is a lot more mentally challenging. Not everyone can do it regardless of how hard they try.

(March 9, 2016 at 11:22 pm)KUSA Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 11:01 pm)Sterben Wrote: In communism a person who is a farmer is equal to the programmer, they both need each other and does not make one better then the other in anyway.

That is a flawed system. They should not be on the same level. Although being a farmer is an important job, it doesn't take a very large skill set to do it. Therefore, most people can easily learn to do it.

The programming job is a lot more mentally challenging. Not everyone can do it regardless of how hard they try.

Which of those two occuptions is more valuable to your well-being?

(March 9, 2016 at 6:10 pm)abaris Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 5:19 pm)Alex K Wrote: He is 75, so that alone doesn't seem like such a hindrance.

But the job is about keeping ones trap shut and to visit foreign leaders occasionally. Doesn't sound like Sanders.

Yes, that's a good reason for him not to do it. Also, The West Wing taught me that VPs tend to be morally ambivalent scheming bastards, and that doesn't fit the description.

I guess this is a typical Trumpster Diver.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/trump-ba...israelite/

Quote:Trump-backing KKK leader refuses to believe Jesus was Jewish: ‘He was an Israelite!’