Trump versus Clinton?

[Thumpalumpacus]

I'm unsure where you got the idea that I said that that was in Texas alone. Mind quoting and linking that alleged post?

In the future, perhaps you should read for comprehension, rather than out of defensiveness. The internet is no place for insecure folks.

The same applies in all of the other States. The Dems simply don't need additional Hispanic votes to win the Blue States as long as the current Dem votes vote for the Dem candidate.  Additional Hispanic voters in the Red States won't turn those States Blue.  And the Dems don't need to win any of the Red States to win the Presidency.  

I believe I asked you to link to a post where I said it was Texas only. Why do you lack the integrity to acknowledge your dishonest argumentation?

What additional Hispanic voters might be able to do as Dems in the Red States is to elect more Dems to State offices and to Congress.  They are irrelevant as far as the Presidential election is concerned.

Please learn how the Electoral College process work before you make further comments about the Presidential election.

I'm well aware of how it works, thankyouverymuch, Woggie. As I said earlier, no one knows, and that includes you.

Hopefully you will have noticed also that I didn't assert that it would tip the scales against Trump, but only that they were doing it to stiffen opposition to Trump. You're new to this reading stuff, aren't you?

I get it, you dislike the idea of non-Aryans voting. But fer chrissakes, kid, at least target the point being made. Doing otherwise only makes you look dumber ... no mean feat, that.

[KUSA]

Yes it is. She is a filthy CUNT!

You're a classless ASS!

And you are a brazen cum guzzling prick.

[Minimalist]

Are you bucking for a cabinet position in the Trump administration, K?  Seems like you are auditioning just like your fucking asshole hero does.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

The same applies in all of the other States. The Dems simply don't need additional Hispanic votes to win the Blue States as long as the current Dem votes vote for the Dem candidate.  Additional Hispanic voters in the Red States won't turn those States Blue.  And the Dems don't need to win any of the Red States to win the Presidency.  

I believe I asked you to link to a post where I said it was Texas only. Why do you lack the integrity to acknowledge your dishonest argumentation?

What additional Hispanic voters might be able to do as Dems in the Red States is to elect more Dems to State offices and to Congress.  They are irrelevant as far as the Presidential election is concerned.

Please learn how the Electoral College process work before you make further comments about the Presidential election.

I'm well aware of how it works, thankyouverymuch, Woggie.  As I said earlier, no one knows, and that includes you.

Hopefully you will have noticed also that I didn't assert that it would tip the scales against Trump, but only that they were doing it to stiffen opposition to Trump. You're new to this reading stuff, aren't you?

I get it, you dislike the idea of non-Aryans voting. But fer chrissakes, kid, at least target the point being made. Doing otherwise only makes you look dumber ... no mean feat, that.

Stiffen opposition?  Are you for real?  Do you really think that the Dems are going to win any Red States in November?  They'll be lucky to keep all of the Blue States with Trump running.  

Now get this through your thick skull:  The Dems don't need any of the Red States to win the Presidency if the Dems in the Blue States show up and vote for the Dem Candidate.  So it doesn't make a rat's ass difference how many Hispanics vote for the Dem candidate in the Red States.  That's because she/he can win without them.  They only matter if they vote for the Dems in the lower offices.  

Now on the flip side, the Repub candidate can get every single vote in all of the Red States and he will lose the election unless he wins a lot of the Blue States.  

So, as far as the Presidential election is concerned, the only voters that matter are the Dem voters in the Red States. They determine who will be the President.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Go back and reread what I wrote, Woggie. Focus on the part where I wrote "I don't know ... And you don't either."

Perhaps if you weren't so insecure you could see that there might be an overlap in our points. But as it is, you're so intent on being "right" that you're unable to even read coherently, by all appearances.

Take a deep breath, Little Buddy. It's only a discussion. You won't get a medal for valor, or a firing squad, no matter what happens.

[Sterben]

[KUSA]

In communism a person who is a farmer is equal to the programmer, they both need each other and does not make one better then the other in anyway.

That is a flawed system. They should not be on the same level. Although being a farmer is an important job, it doesn't take a very large skill set to do it. Therefore, most people can easily learn to do it.

The programming job is a lot more mentally challenging. Not everyone can do it regardless of how hard they try.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

In communism a person who is a farmer is equal to the programmer, they both need each other and does not make one better then the other in anyway.

That is a flawed system. They should not be on the same level. Although being a farmer is an important job, it doesn't take a very large skill set to do it. Therefore, most people can easily learn to do it.

The programming job is a lot more mentally challenging. Not everyone can do it regardless of how hard they try.

Which of those two occuptions is more valuable to your well-being?

[Alex K]

He is 75, so that alone doesn't seem like such a hindrance.

But the job is about keeping ones trap shut and to visit foreign leaders occasionally. Doesn't sound like Sanders.

Yes, that's a good reason for him not to do it. Also, The West Wing taught me that VPs tend to be morally ambivalent scheming bastards, and that doesn't fit the description.

[Minimalist]