(March 12, 2016 at 9:25 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Which is why I questioned if he'd actually be able to accomplish it.

The Dems may flip control of the senate but they won't get 60 votes.

The House?  Forget it.

(March 11, 2016 at 9:15 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:

(March 11, 2016 at 4:52 pm)Drich Wrote: What do you think will happen when companies like apple and google really start to feel the 'boin'?

Companies that leave the United States in order to evade the taxes they should be paying (as they should help pay for a society that enables their business operations to succeed), let them go. If companies are just going to leech off the government (often the same companies which declare massive profits while underpaying employees), why should we keep them around?

So Apple, Google, Microsoft, Ford, GM etc... We should let them all just go??? Do you think we could survive without them and the trillions the generater and dump back intoo this country every year??

Quote:Companies who outsource jobs should be taxed double to make up for the damage they cause by seeking cheaper and more desperate labor overseas in order to line the profits of executives and shareholders.

Which is Exactly what trump says he will do.. "Make it too expensive to do business over seas, and yet make it more affordable to do business here."

Is that what Trump will do?  That would be disastrous for the US, as it's been every time we, or anyone else..has tried it. Protectionism appeals to our self interest well enough, it just doesn't serve it.

I thought the republican party was the party of sound fiscal planning? What happened?

So to you make big companies pay big fines for outsourcing is ok but only if Sanders is allowed to first tax them upto 75% of their profits, But Trump's 'fines/tax relief repeal' for outsourcing will be disastrous if he penalizes over seas outsourcing like you suggested, if he then allows big business tax breaks for creating jobs/ doing business back in the united states???

That's some socialist logic your using there. Something I don't quite understand. can you explain to me how doing what you said by" penalizing outsourcing" and taxing the hell out of business (Penalize 'In-sourcing' as well, what sanders has vowed to do) is good for the country...
-But-
Penalizing out sourcing by removing the tax incentives big business currently enjoys for out sourcing is removed, (which will make is very expensive to do business over seas) and giving tax incentives (which will make things cheaper to do business domestically) for creating jobs and bring industry back to America from over seas is then a bad thing?

Who's going to pay for all of that military hardware the warmongers say that we need?

(March 14, 2016 at 11:39 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Who's going to pay for all of that military hardware the warmongers say that we need?

Trump says we are going to take the ISIS held oil fields, and make them pay.

(March 14, 2016 at 11:05 am)Rhythm Wrote: Is that what Trump will do?  That would be disastrous for the US, as it's been every time we, or anyone else..has tried it. Protectionism appeals to our self interest well enough, it just doesn't serve it.

I thought the republican party was the party of sound fiscal planning? What happened?

Most people that like Trump also dislike the Republican Party. Trumps ideas are not mainstream republican shit.

I personally don't like the Republican Party. I don't like the Democratic Party either though. Both of them have puppet strings on them.

(March 11, 2016 at 1:21 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: It is extremely difficult to make over 80k a year without one. It is not absolutely necessary, no, but not having one restricts your career choices immensely.

I know people in the trades who are doing better than that.

(March 11, 2016 at 1:37 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Just so Dirch is aware:



George W. Bush kissing the biggest financier of "Radical Islam" ever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cMlIsd0seo

Who is Roland Reagan? 

No, you didn't.