(May 2, 2016 at 9:32 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(May 2, 2016 at 7:36 am)Gawdzilla Wrote: So, you think scoobysnack knows the Lone Gunman who fired the Magic Bullet from the Grassy Knoll and want to keep him quiet?

Do you honestly think if scoobs knew, that I'd be stupid enough to let him live. If he knew I'd have arranged for him to be on the same plane as Ron Browne.

I think it would depend on the person. Some people are so ludicrously bad at CTing that they actually help the rational size with their posting.

(May 2, 2016 at 10:00 am)Gawdzilla Wrote:

(May 2, 2016 at 9:32 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Do you honestly think if scoobs knew, that I'd be stupid enough to let him live. If he knew I'd have arranged for him to be on the same plane as Ron Browne.

I think it would depend on the person. Some people are so ludicrously bad at CTing that they actually help the rational size with their posting.

Ah come on now Gawdzilla give me some credit. Just like I don't criticise your work keeping the lizard overlords under wraps, please don't criticise how I stifle the truth about JFK and 11-9-2001.

(May 2, 2016 at 10:04 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(May 2, 2016 at 10:00 am)Gawdzilla Wrote: I think it would depend on the person. Some people are so ludicrously bad at CTing that they actually help the rational size with their posting.

Ah come on now Gawdzilla give me some credit. Just like I don't criticise your work keeping the lizard overlords under wraps, please don't criticise how I stifle the truth about JFK and 11-9-2001.

I was referring to Mr. Snacks.

(May 2, 2016 at 10:08 am)Gawdzilla Wrote:

(May 2, 2016 at 10:04 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Ah come on now Gawdzilla give me some credit. Just like I don't criticise your work keeping the lizard overlords under wraps, please don't criticise how I stifle the truth about JFK and 11-9-2001.

I was referring to Mr. Snacks.

I know, I was seeing how far I could run with a bad joke. Looks like about five steps before I fall and punch myself in the jaw.

(May 2, 2016 at 10:10 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(May 2, 2016 at 10:08 am)Gawdzilla Wrote: I was referring to Mr. Snacks.

I know, I was seeing how far I could run with a bad joke. Looks like about five steps before I fall and punch myself in the jaw.

The key to happiness is to accept that you'll sometimes fail, and then do that failing with style and panache.

That's exactly what a cat would say.

(April 10, 2016 at 2:02 am)Heat Wrote: Title pretty much says it all.

I think personally, even if this never amounted to much legitimacy, or any real "findings" per-se it would be super fucking fun. The way I imagine it would be people suggest conspiracies, back it up with evidence, and then people respond with contradictory evidence, and it divulges in to back and forths about what means what. As in, people suggest theories, and it's up to us to disprove them.

I don't know, thoughts? Agree/disagree?

Weird how they're called theories, though, when they're at best hypotheses (and not even good ones at that).

(May 3, 2016 at 5:37 am)Irrational Wrote:

(April 10, 2016 at 2:02 am)Heat Wrote: Title pretty much says it all.

I think personally, even if this never amounted to much legitimacy, or any real "findings" per-se it would be super fucking fun. The way I imagine it would be people suggest conspiracies, back it up with evidence, and then people respond with contradictory evidence, and it divulges in to back and forths about what means what. As in, people suggest theories, and it's up to us to disprove them.

I don't know, thoughts? Agree/disagree?

Weird how they're called theories, though, when they're at best hypotheses (and not even good ones at that).

Unfortunate, really, because it confuses people in to believing their crackpot 9/11 truther theories are on the same level as things such as the scientific theory of gravity simply due to the name.

(April 10, 2016 at 2:02 am)Heat Wrote: Title pretty much says it all.

I think personally, even if this never amounted to much legitimacy, or any real "findings" per-se it would be super fucking fun. The way I imagine it would be people suggest conspiracies, back it up with evidence, and then people respond with contradictory evidence, and it divulges in to back and forths about what means what. As in, people suggest theories, and it's up to us to disprove them.

I don't know, thoughts? Agree/disagree?

Oh, sure...join your little conspiracy theories subforum. You LIKE that, wouldn't you, you and your masters on the Tri-Lateral Commission? Look, pal, I haven't spent the best part of my life interpreting crop circles and using that info to build the trans-dimensional sub-woofer that will (when I get it finished) summon Sasquatch and his hyper cube to finally explain to us the link between the JFK assassination and why candy bars keep getting smaller while the price goes up. You can go peddle this particular fish to the mindless drones and herd-minders who can't see the forest for all the murdered microbiologists in their way.

I'd write more, but I have to be fitted for my new foil fedora.

Boru

(May 3, 2016 at 5:33 am)Little lunch Wrote: That's exactly what a cat would say.

I'm currently owned by four of our Feline Overloads.