(June 24, 2016 at 5:41 am)Irrational Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 5:09 am)Sheed1980 Wrote: Since u want to know the truth let me give it to u. I will tell u the Qur'anic chapter, verse, and word of that verse's number to show where we get this information. For example 1:2:3=Chapter 1, verse 2, word 3. The Arabic letters Ba (B) Ha (H) and Ra ® together in this order spell the word Bahr or "sea".
(2:50:4), (2:164:13), (5:96:4), (6:59:12), (6:63:7), (6:97:11), (7:138:4), (7:163:7), (10:22:6), (10:90:4), (14:32:21), (16:14:4), (17:66:7), (17:67:5), (17:70:8), (18:61:10), (18:63:19), (18:79:7), (18:109:4), (18:109:9), (20:77:12), (22:65:13), (26:63:7), (27:63:6), (30:41:5), (31:27:8), (31:31:7), (42:32:5), (44:24:2), (45:12:5), (52:6:1), (55:24:5). So u see here are the 32 verses that use the word "Bahr" for "sea".

The Arabic letters Ba (B) Alif (A) Ra ® together spell Bar or "land".
(5:96:12), (6:59:11), (6:63:6), (6:97:10), (10:22:5), (17:67:14), (17:68:6), (17:70:7), (27:63:5), (29:65:13), (30:41:4), (31:32:13), (98:7:9). So u see here are the 13 verses that use the word "Bar" for "land".

When u add 32+13 u get 45. 32/45=71.111% 13/45=28.889%. These are each the exact percentage of water(71.111%) and percentage of land (28.889%) that scientists have proven as covering the surface of our Earth . And if u happen to add 71.111% and 28.889% u get 100% or our TOTAL EARTH in case of this debate. So it has been proven to u my friend. So if u would like to look at these verses of the Qur'an and check for urself then u can do the math if it makes u feel better. But the numbers don't lie, nor does the Qur'an. It is the word of God Allah, and surely Allah speaks the truth.

Please stop fabricating facts about what scientists have proven. You don't know what you're talking about, dude.

All u have 2 do is check it out to verify it. U will see it's the truth. And I guarantee u it's not the only one. There are many, many more from the same scripture. Too many to be called just a coincidence my friend

(June 24, 2016 at 6:23 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 5:09 am)Sheed1980 Wrote: Since u want to know the truth let me give it to u. I will tell u the Qur'anic chapter, verse, and word of that verse's number to show where we get this information. For example 1:2:3=Chapter 1, verse 2, word 3. The Arabic letters Ba (B) Ha (H) and Ra ® together in this order spell the word Bahr or "sea".
(2:50:4), (2:164:13), (5:96:4), (6:59:12), (6:63:7), (6:97:11), (7:138:4), (7:163:7), (10:22:6), (10:90:4), (14:32:21), (16:14:4), (17:66:7), (17:67:5), (17:70:8), (18:61:10), (18:63:19), (18:79:7), (18:109:4), (18:109:9), (20:77:12), (22:65:13), (26:63:7), (27:63:6), (30:41:5), (31:27:8), (31:31:7), (42:32:5), (44:24:2), (45:12:5), (52:6:1), (55:24:5). So u see here are the 32 verses that use the word "Bahr" for "sea".

The Arabic letters Ba (B) Alif (A) Ra ® together spell Bar or "land".
(5:96:12), (6:59:11), (6:63:6), (6:97:10), (10:22:5), (17:67:14), (17:68:6), (17:70:7), (27:63:5), (29:65:13), (30:41:4), (31:32:13), (98:7:9). So u see here are the 13 verses that use the word "Bar" for "land".

When u add 32+13 u get 45. 32/45=71.111% 13/45=28.889%. These are each the exact percentage of water(71.111%) and percentage of land (28.889%) that scientists have proven as covering the surface of our Earth . And if u happen to add 71.111% and 28.889% u get 100% or our TOTAL EARTH in case of this debate. So it has been proven to u my friend. So if u would like to look at these verses of the Qur'an and check for urself then u can do the math if it makes u feel better. But the numbers don't lie, nor does the Qur'an. It is the word of God Allah, and surely Allah speaks the truth.

No, shit for brains when I say I want evidence, I expect evidence not bullshit.

And a few months ago when you were last peddling this shit, I told you what would constitue evidence, a document which showed how muslims deciphered a scientific principle from messages in the qu'ran prior to scientists independently finding it. You were unable to provide me with evidnce then, you are unable now. That is because there was no use of the qu'ran to provide scientific principles until after those principles were independently discovered, a post hoc insertion of science into your delusional fantasies.

What ur misunderstanding is I am showing u the document. It's the Qur'an. U as most people just see it as a scripture that our God whom u don't believe in sent to our Prophet Muhammad pbuh verses at a time over a 23 year period. So u just see verses mentioning how we have to worship God alone and how we should live our lifestyles as people, and stories of the angels and jinn. The fall of the jinn Iblis to the rejected and accursed enemy to all mankind, Satan. The teachings of how we were created as humans, how we will die, and how we will be raised back to life after our Earth is destroyed by God Himself on Judgment Day. And how we will be either granted the reward of Paradise or the torment of Hell-fire. U see these stories and it just seems like any old religion that can be made up by anybody. But what God did to prove that it was Him alone that created and sent the message to mankind through His messenger Muhammad pbuh, is put in many subliminal messages and calculations so to say, that no single person among mankind of the 7th century had the slightest knowledge of. But with our technology today we are able to verify and confirm the words of the Qur'an are absolutely true. So scientists and astronomers who read the Qur'an and see the miracles in the Arabic messages question who could've known these things over 1400 years ago, in the 7th century? The science, math, astronomy, linguistics, and even listing of future events is shown that only God Allah alone could have this knowledge and power, and only He alone could produce such a scripture as proof. This is why He challenges ALL OF MANKIND, if we desired, to produce just one single chapter like that of the Qur'an. He guarantees we couldn't because He would not enable us to do so.

(June 23, 2016 at 7:17 pm)Irrational Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 4:00 pm)Sheed1980 Wrote: Well 71.11% is not even .2% more than 71%. Closer than any amount u have proven. So to make u feel better 71% is right at ABOUT 71.11% which is calculated and verified in the Holy Qur'an.

You're not reading anything correctly. I visited a few of the links you posted, and none of them say 71.11. You are saying it, and I know why you have to add a .11 to the number. Because without that, your argument means shit. Well, it already is anyway.

So would it make u feel better if I said 71%? I mean with the calculation the 71.11% is not even 1/5 of 1% difference(.20). Actually it's just barely over 1/10 of 1% difference(.10). So rounding to the nearest whole percent I have no problem saying approximately 71%. Because the 71.11% is just barely higher than 71% itself. So my argument definitely stands and still has support as true. Just a portion of 1% higher

(June 24, 2016 at 8:45 am)Sheed1980 Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 7:17 pm)Irrational Wrote: You're not reading anything correctly. I visited a few of the links you posted, and none of them say 71.11. You are saying it, and I know why you have to add a .11 to the number. Because without that, your argument means shit. Well, it already is anyway.

So would it make u feel better if I said 71%? I mean with the calculation the 71.11% is not even 1/5 of 1% difference(.20). Actually it's just barely over 1/10 of 1% difference(.10). So rounding to the nearest whole percent I have no problem saying approximately 71%. Because the 71.11% is just barely higher than 71% itself. So my argument definitely stands and still has support as true. Just a portion of 1% higher

It's not exactly 71.11%. That it's rounded does not mean it must be 71.11% when not rounded. This means either you lied when you said science proved the exact figures, or you are just dumb.

And, yeah, that makes a lot of difference between exact and approximate regardless of the magnitude of difference. Why? Because approximately 71% could mean a margin of error of +- 0.5% or +- 2% (for example). With exact numbers, because they're supposed to be exact, then if the number doesn't turn out exactly to be as argued, then the claim is exactly wrong.

(June 23, 2016 at 7:40 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 3:39 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I'm not convinced Sheed isn't a troll.

Trolls would be smart enough to hide under a bridge when it rains Koran.

You lost me at "Trolls would be smart"

I voted "at least once" because that's definitely not incorrect.

(June 24, 2016 at 11:37 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 7:40 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Trolls would be smart enough to hide under a bridge when it rains Koran.

You lost me at "Trolls would be smart"

Not "smart". "Smart enough" to meet a very low standard. So low trolls can meet it. Hardly anything other than the bible and Koran can be lower.

You can be a Bible/Koran thumping moron AND a moron troll too

(June 24, 2016 at 10:08 am)Irrational Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 8:45 am)Sheed1980 Wrote: So would it make u feel better if I said 71%? I mean with the calculation the 71.11% is not even 1/5 of 1% difference(.20). Actually it's just barely over 1/10 of 1% difference(.10). So rounding to the nearest whole percent I have no problem saying approximately 71%. Because the 71.11% is just barely higher than 71% itself. So my argument definitely stands and still has support as true. Just a portion of 1% higher

It's not exactly 71.11%. That it's rounded does not mean it must be 71.11% when not rounded. This means either you lied when you said science proved the exact figures, or you are just dumb.

And, yeah, that makes a lot of difference between exact and approximate regardless of the magnitude of difference. Why? Because approximately 71% could mean a margin of error of +- 0.5% or +- 2% (for example). With exact numbers, because they're supposed to be exact, then if the number doesn't turn out exactly to be as argued, then the claim is exactly wrong.

So since u know how much exactly it is prove the answer from the Qur'an as wrong. That's all u have to do. Put forward ur proof to show the truth.

Someone with that flawed an understanding of the burden of proof is almost not worth discussing with.