The Moon

Oh well, it's less isolated than the K is now. The moon sounds like a great place to move.

We're not the UK anymore. We're just the K

I always thought it was weird that the UK is referred to as just the "UK". I mean, that's basically a description of the type of union and government, it says absolutely nothing about the country itself.

If they were another "United Kingdom" in the world, it would be pretty ambiguous.

(June 26, 2016 at 2:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I always thought it was weird that the UK is referred to as just the "UK". I mean, that's basically a description of the type of union and government, it says absolutely nothing about the country itself.

If they were another "United Kingdom" in the world, it would be pretty ambiguous.

That's an example of naming rights.  For instance, England is the only country that doesn't put its name on postage stamps.  That's because it invented them.  So when it united several areas under its king it called itself the "United Kingdom" and no other country can use that name even if it had a king and similar areas under his control.

Another vote in Scotland...really?
When we voted to join the Eu Scotland voted against it.
When Scotland voted on leaving the UK they voted to stay.
When we voted on leaving the Eu they voted to stay.
Now they want to vote to leave the UK.
Could go either way LOL.

(June 26, 2016 at 2:21 pm)Expired Wrote: Another vote in Scotland...really?
When we voted to join the Eu Scotland voted against it.
When Scotland voted on leaving the UK they voted to stay.
When we voted on leaving the Eu they voted to stay.
Now they want to vote to leave the UK.
Could go either way LOL.

The dummies better get a guarantee that they can get into the EU before they jump out of the UK.

(June 26, 2016 at 2:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If they were another "United Kingdom" in the world, it would be pretty ambiguous.

It's rather Great Britain for us. Or, if we're lazy, it's only England, although that doesn't cover all of it - as of yet. Hardly anyone uses the equivalent of UK, apart from a few news anchors and journalists to have another word at their disposal. For variety.

(June 26, 2016 at 2:24 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 2:21 pm)Expired Wrote: Another vote in Scotland...really?
When we voted to join the Eu Scotland voted against it.
When Scotland voted on leaving the UK they voted to stay.
When we voted on leaving the Eu they voted to stay.
Now they want to vote to leave the UK.
Could go either way LOL.

The dummies better get a guarantee that they can get into the EU before they jump out of the UK.

That's if they don't change their minds.

(June 26, 2016 at 2:26 pm)abaris Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 2:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If they were another "United Kingdom" in the world, it would be pretty ambiguous.

It's rather Great Britain for us. Or, if we're lazy, it's only England, although that doesn't cover all of it - as of yet. Hardly anyone uses the equivalent of UK, apart from a few news anchors and journalists to have another word at their disposal. For variety.

Really? When I lived there it was often called the UK, more so than the other words. "Great Britain" was used for the Olympics, which I thought was odd because Great Britain is the name of a single island (admittedly the largest in the British Isles), and presumably we had Northern Ireland competitors, perhaps even competitors from Guernsey, the Shetlands etc.

UK makes more sense as at least it's a shortening of the official name "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".

(June 26, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Really? When I lived there it was often called the UK, more so than the other words. "Great Britain" was used for the Olympics, which I thought was odd because Great Britain is the name of a single island (admittedly the largest in the British Isles), and presumably we had Northern Ireland competitors, perhaps even competitors from Guernsey, the Shetlands etc.

UK makes more sense as at least it's a shortening of the official name "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".

I'm talking about German speaking countries. Großbritannien instead of Vereinigtes Königreich.

This Guardian commenter's theory about why Boris Johnson doesn't look particularly happy or as encouraged as he was before the vote is interesting:

Quote:If Boris Johnson looked downbeat yesterday, that is because he realises that he has lost.

Perhaps many Brexiters do not realise it yet, but they have actually lost, and it is all down to one man: David Cameron.

With one fell swoop yesterday at 9:15 am, Cameron effectively annulled the referendum result, and simultaneously destroyed the political careers of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and leading Brexiters who cost him so much anguish, not to mention his premiership.

How?

Throughout the campaign, Cameron had repeatedly said that a vote for leave would lead to triggering Article 50 straight away. Whether implicitly or explicitly, the image was clear: he would be giving that notice under Article 50 the morning after a vote to leave. Whether that was scaremongering or not is a bit moot now but, in the midst of the sentimental nautical references of his speech yesterday, he quietly abandoned that position and handed the responsibility over to his successor.

And as the day wore on, the enormity of that step started to sink in: the markets, Sterling, Scotland, the Irish border, the Gibraltar border, the frontier at Calais, the need to continue compliance with all EU regulations for a free market, re-issuing passports, Brits abroad, EU citizens in Britain, the mountain of legistlation to be torn up and rewritten ... the list grew and grew.

The referendum result is not binding. It is advisory. Parliament is not bound to commit itself in that same direction.

The Conservative party election that Cameron triggered will now have one question looming over it: will you, if elected as party leader, trigger the notice under Article 50?

Who will want to have the responsibility of all those ramifications and consequences on his/her head and shoulders?

Boris Johnson knew this yesterday, when he emerged subdued from his home and was even more subdued at the press conference. He has been out-maneouvered and check-mated.

If he runs for leadership of the party, and then fails to follow through on triggering Article 50, then he is finished. If he does not run and effectively abandons the field, then he is finished. If he runs, wins and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over - Scotland will break away, there will be upheaval in Ireland, a recession ... broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished. Boris Johnson knows all of this. When he acts like the dumb blond it is just that: an act.

The Brexit leaders now have a result that they cannot use. For them, leadership of the Tory party has become a poison chalice.

When Boris Johnson said there was no need to trigger Article 50 straight away, what he really meant to say was “never”. When Michael Gove went on and on about “informal negotiations” ... why? why not the formal ones straight away? ... he also meant not triggering the formal departure. They both know what a formal demarche would mean: an irreversible step that neither of them is prepared to take.

All that remains is for someone to have the guts to stand up and say that Brexit is unachievable in reality without an enormous amount of pain and destruction, that cannot be borne. And David Cameron has put the onus of making that statement on the heads of the people who led the Brexit campaign.

Thoughts?