(July 6, 2016 at 10:12 pm)Aractus Wrote: Me? Min, what I am outraged about is not that your country has lame-duck leaders up for President. My complaint is that your democratic process is fundamentally flawed, you have had widespread incidences of electoral fraud, you allow candidates who are being criminally investigated on espionage charges to run for president, you talk about "race" as if it's a real, tangible thing, and on top of all that your country is the world's leading terrorist organisation.

Lol, "the world's leading terrorist organization."  

You really need to stop with this hyperbolic anti-American bullshit, because it detracts from the credibility of legitimate criticisms of the U.S. government.  Look, I'll be the first to criticize our government and our terrible foreign policy that has led to untold suffering and misery across the globe in the name of self-interests, but calling it the leading terrorist organization implies that if someone put a gun to your head and made you choose between living in the U.S. or living with ISIS, you would choose to live with ISIS.  Because you'd want to live with the lesser terrorist organization, right?  That's funny, you don't strike me as being that foolish...

(July 7, 2016 at 9:45 am)Faith No More Wrote: Lol, "the world's leading terrorist organization."  

Right then, I'm putting it in my sig. The link is there now and you can read it for yourself.

America's population is not monochromatic and we do vote differently. But I am not as stupid as to claim that we don't do things wrong, we do, and Bush Jr is a prime example of too many individuals voting in an inept fucking moron. Trump will be 1,000 times worse, but hopefully sanity will kick in and we wont have that disaster of a sick fuck anywhere near the White House.

Didn't James basically say: "the F.B.I chose not to recommend indictment because Hillary is too stupid to have criminal intent". I don't know why people think this helps Hilary. If anything, James is trying to say Hilary may well be as stupid as Donald. The entire speech the other day was all a thinly veiled attack at Hilary, even if he decided not to recommend indictments. So now you have to candidates with low intelligence.

I was hoping James would do the right thing. But, of course, we all know, or we should do anyway, there is a different set of laws for the 1%. She should have been charged, but she has the backing of so much money. Many cooperations and billionaires have invested in her.

James did the best he could give the situation. Now, I don't think Donald is sincere when he says the system is rigged, but another Hilary scandal going "poof!" I think does help his argument. He knows that if he's down in the polls he needs to move left, so he's trying his best to appeal to the "Bernie or Bust" crowd, and to undecided voters. Donald's rhetoric has changed now the primaries are over, and he's shown he does much better with a teleprompter.

Meanwhile, Hilary is too arrogant to be worried. She hasn't done anything to reach out to Bernie voters (whose vote she doesn't own) and then people wonder why the "Bernie or Bust" movement is growing. She should be ashamed that Donald is doing more than her to try and appeal Bernie voters. But she's too arrogant; she think people don't have a choice but to vote for her when they absolutely do have a choice

(July 7, 2016 at 12:20 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Didn't James basically say: "the F.B.I chose not to recommend indictment because Hillary is too stupid to have criminal intent". I don't know why people think this helps Hilary. If anything, James is trying to say Hilary may well be as stupid as Donald. The entire speech the other day was all a thinly veiled attack at Hilary, even if he decided not to recommend indictments. So now you have to candidates with low intelligence.

I was hoping James would do the right thing. But, of course, we all know, or we should do anyway, there is a different set of laws for the 1%. She should have been charged, but she has the backing of so much money. Many cooperations and billionaires have invested in her.

James did the best he could give the situation. Now, I don't think Donald is sincere when he says the system is rigged, but another Hilary scandal going "poof!" I think does help his argument. He knows that if he's down in the polls he needs to move left, so he's trying his best to appeal to the "Bernie or Bust" crowd, and to undecided voters. Donald's rhetoric has changed now the primaries are over, and he's shown he does much better with a teleprompter.

Meanwhile, Hilary is too arrogant to be worried. She hasn't done anything to reach out to Bernie voters (whose vote she doesn't own) and then people wonder why the "Bernie or Bust" movement is growing. She should be ashamed that Donald is doing more than her to try and appeal Bernie voters. But she's too arrogant; she think people don't have a choice but to vote for her when they absolutely do have a choice

Stop it, the GOP has been going after Hillary long before she held any public office. She's just the next in line. If Hillary were not the nominee, just like Obama, if it were Warren or Bernie, the GOP would still childishly cry doomsday with some other bullshit excuse.

GOP's marketing is the same chicken little "The sky is falling'. If Jesus were running they'd call him a commie. GOP doesn't give one fuck who dem's nominate. They are willing to throw a Republican FBI agent who was appointed by their own party under the bus.

(July 7, 2016 at 11:53 am)Aractus Wrote: Right then, I'm putting it in my sig. The link is there now and you can read it for yourself.

I read it, and it doesn't say what you think it says.

(July 7, 2016 at 12:20 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Didn't James basically say: "the F.B.I chose not to recommend indictment because Hillary is too stupid to have criminal intent". I don't know why people think this helps Hilary. If anything, James is trying to say Hilary may well be as stupid as Donald. The entire speech the other day was all a thinly veiled attack at Hilary, even if he decided not to recommend indictments. So now you have to candidates with low intelligence.

I was hoping James would do the right thing. But, of course, we all know, or we should do anyway, there is a different set of laws for the 1%. She should have been charged, but she has the backing of so much money. Many cooperations and billionaires have invested in her.

James did the best he could give the situation. Now, I don't think Donald is sincere when he says the system is rigged, but another Hilary scandal going "poof!" I think does help his argument. He knows that if he's down in the polls he needs to move left, so he's trying his best to appeal to the "Bernie or Bust" crowd, and to undecided voters. Donald's rhetoric has changed now the primaries are over, and he's shown he does much better with a teleprompter.

Meanwhile, Hilary is too arrogant to be worried. She hasn't done anything to reach out to Bernie voters (whose vote she doesn't own) and then people wonder why the "Bernie or Bust" movement is growing. She should be ashamed that Donald is doing more than her to try and appeal Bernie voters. But she's too arrogant; she think people don't have a choice but to vote for her when they absolutely do have a choice

That and she had no intent of giving over said classified information so he called her stupid and misguided there is nothing to charge her with the 
classified information but on the other hand there is more of a case since there is the DNC emails and others linked to super delegates that are in jail now 
and soon to be jailed for public corruption and election rigging.

Holy shit. I watched the director of the FBI before congress today. He flat out said she did all the things but the only problem was that they cannot prove criminal intent. Wooow. This is so much worse than I thought. I really thought all this stuff was hyped up...but it wasn't. He seriously said something like he's not sure that Clinton is sophisticated enough to know she was breaking the law....wut.

Someone talk some sense into me because I am feeling like I'm going to vote for Sanders afterall.

The Clinton legal team deleted a large number of e-mails. Properly deleted. Properly disposed of so the FBI couldn't find them. Obviously She has things to hide. Had James seen those e-mails things may have been deleted.

Hilary's whole campaign is only: "I'm a woman so vote for me, You're mysoginist if you don't vote for me." All she has going for her is identity politics. In 2008 her camp was all "party unity my ass" (puma) and now that Bernie voters are "Bernie or Bust" th Hilary people are behaving like nasty little toddlers. I don't see why people should fall in line and pray to Hilary?

EDIT: Yes Losty, exactly what I was alluding to in my previous post. He really ripped her to shreds. Yet the Hilary people insist James and the FBI helped her by not recommending indictments. And people still insist Donald is loads worse.

I'm more afraid of Hilary because, unlike Donald (who could achieve very little as president), she has the backing of the entire system and the neo-conservative war hawks are drawn to her like iron to a magnet. And we also now know, thanks to the FBI investigation Hilary is about as incompetent as Donald.

(July 7, 2016 at 4:09 pm)Losty Wrote: Holy shit. I watched the director of the FBI before congress today. He flat out said she did all the things but the only problem was that they cannot prove criminal intent. Wooow. This is so much worse than I thought. I really thought all this stuff was hyped up...but it wasn't. He seriously said something like he's not sure that Clinton is sophisticated enough to know she was breaking the law....wut.

Someone talk some sense into me because I am feeling like I'm going to vote for Sanders afterall.

Okay Losty HRC is as corrupt as any politician can get that being said she voted for NAFTA and the TPP both of which 
are terrible for the middle class and lower class that being said. HRC is as dumb as they come she didn't have intent to sell
the information to America enemies she had the private server even though it wasn't for convenience she did it for the fact
she probably doing some underhanded business deals with her donors. And say that because you have some super delegates 
behind bars because of her. Then you have the fact that no national media outlet will speak out against here there is even the 
recount in California Bernie won she didn't. She had the election rigged for her to win at the start of it all these hillary supporters
in the media fear Bernie and want him to drop out. In a election for president if it were to happen now you are looking at fifty fifty chance
of trump or hillary. Bernie is a far more likable candidate and can be trump four times over i wouldn't be surprised if clinton lost her Clearance 
over having that server. After all HRC is a known liar that loves to play dumb she has a history and none of it looks good on her.