I see several people here are vitriolic and more than a little prolific in their posts that portrayTrump in a negative light. It is not hard to find common ground as to why he may be a poor candidate for President.

Would anyone care to articulate why we should cast our vote for Mrs Clinton, as she is the only viable option remaining with a real chance of winning?

Please refrain from arguing for a third party, I voted for Perot in 92, unlikely I could be swayed into going down that road again.

(August 3, 2016 at 2:28 pm)PETE_ROSE Wrote: Would anyone care to articulate why we should cast our vote for Mrs Clinton, as she is the only viable option remaining with a real chance of winning?

To prevent an incompetent madman from entering the white house. No more needs to be said.

(August 3, 2016 at 2:28 pm)PETE_ROSE Wrote: I see several people here are vitriolic and more than a little prolific in their posts that portrayTrump in a negative light.  It is not hard to find common ground as to why he may be a poor candidate for President.  

Would anyone care to articulate why we should cast our vote for Mrs Clinton, as she is the only viable option remaining with a real chance of winning?

Please refrain from arguing for a third party, I voted for Perot in 92, unlikely I could be swayed into going down that road again.

Because she will appoint Supreme Court Judges who won't jump at the chance to overturn Roe v. Wade

She's been villified for 30 years by fascist assholes. Ask them what "crimes" she has committed and watch them hem and haw.  They don't do "facts."

You know, you can only listen to talk radio for so long before your brain cells die.

(August 3, 2016 at 3:30 pm)Minimalist Wrote: She's been villified for 30 years by fascist assholes. Ask them what "crimes" she has committed and watch them hem and haw.  They don't do "facts."

You know, you can only listen to talk radio for so long before your brain cells die.

You throw that term around a lot, don't you?

You have another name for them?

I don't know about the rest of the GOP lot, but Trump is stylizing himself pretty much as a fascist leader. He claims a personal cult (explicitely stating "only I can save this nation" in his acceptance speech), seeks to impose a form of thought police and persecution on a large minority (a muslim test).

(August 3, 2016 at 3:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You have another name for them?

Not really.

I was just pointing out a fact.

(August 3, 2016 at 3:37 pm)Alex K Wrote: I don't know about the rest of the GOP lot, but Trump is stylizing himself pretty much as a fascist leader. He claims a personal cult (explicitely stating "only I can save this nation" in his acceptance speech), seeks to impose a form of thought police and persecution on a large minority (a muslim test).

Reminded me of this.

Pfft only two options my ass. Sorry but Johnson is 2% away from getting into the debates. But you don't want to hear about good candidates you wanna hear about the lesser of two evils >.>