(August 4, 2016 at 3:32 pm)Irrational Wrote:

(August 4, 2016 at 3:06 pm)RobertE Wrote: Believe me, if there ever was a group called the "White liberation movement", there would be cries of racism from abaris.

Why would there be such a group?

Why wouldn't there be? Equal rights for all, no? Or would that be considered "racist"?

South Africa.

'Nuff said.

(August 4, 2016 at 3:09 pm)RobertE Wrote:

(August 4, 2016 at 1:37 pm)ukatheist Wrote: Can I just point out:

- Not all people of arabic descent are immigrants
- Not all crimes committed by muslims are terrorist attacks
- Muslim people can suffer from mental illness as much as a non muslim

Just as not all skinheads are neo nazis.

Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk

-Not all people of white origins are racist. Read any liberal left literature and you'll find that the contrary is often stated.
-Not all hate crimes are committed by white people, this can be all races.
-Again, all races can suffer from mental illnesses.

Agreed

(August 4, 2016 at 3:35 pm)RobertE Wrote:

(August 4, 2016 at 3:32 pm)Irrational Wrote: Why would there be such a group?

Why wouldn't there be? Equal rights for all, no? Or would that be considered "racist"?

It may be sociologically considered racist in the modern sense, yes.

(August 4, 2016 at 2:45 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Because certain factions within BLM are encouraging violence towards whites, particularly police officers for political aims.

Based on what?

(August 4, 2016 at 3:06 pm)RobertE Wrote: Believe me, if there ever was a group called the "White liberation movement", there would be cries of racism from abaris. Which does suggest double-standards, or should I say in French, "deux poids, deux mesures."

You see - sometimes double standards are necessary, because you're talking about TWO DIFFERENT THINGS...

What is the common tyranny, that all people of Caucasian descent would need liberation from, as opposed to "non-whites"? Please, do tell: what - other than racist agenda - would a group called "White Liberation Movement" be focused on, since there is nothing specific that most of white people need liberating from?

(August 4, 2016 at 10:44 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(August 4, 2016 at 3:06 pm)RobertE Wrote: Believe me, if there ever was a group called the "White liberation movement", there would be cries of racism from abaris. Which does suggest double-standards, or should I say in French, "deux poids, deux mesures."

You see - sometimes double standards are necessary, because you're talking about TWO DIFFERENT THINGS...

What is the common tyranny, that all people of Caucasian descent would need liberation from, as opposed to "non-whites"? Please, do tell: what - other than racist agenda - would a group called "White Liberation Movement" be focused on, since there is nothing specific that most of white people need liberating from?

So tell me, do high ranking police officers in the Metropolitan police in the United Kingdom need a Black police officers association which is exclusive to blacks, and not whites or any other minority race. The fact that it is "black", suggests to me that it is racist against not only white people and other ethnic minorities, which is against the law if I'm right. Does this black police group need liberating from anyone when most of their members earn more money in one month than you do in a year? Put it this way, they are like trade unions, the chiefs of the union have it great, earn a nice salary and they don't give a fuck about its members in reality.

A nice little article written by a former black footballer:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/footb...67549.html

Quote:"I just wanted to be the England captain, I didn't want to be remembered as the first black England captain because I didn't look at it in that way.

A black man who tells it as it is with no punches pulled. Sol Campbell, just someone with a chip on their shoulder. The only sports person who was capable of putting football back to the stone age.

(August 4, 2016 at 11:10 pm)RobertE Wrote: So tell me, do high ranking police officers in the Metropolitan police in the United Kingdom need a Black police officers association which is exclusive to blacks, and not whites or any other minority race. The fact that it is "black", suggests to me that it is racist against not only white people and other ethnic minorities, which is against the law if I'm right. Does this black police group need liberating from anyone when most of their members earn more money in one month than you do in a year? Put it this way, they are like trade unions, the chiefs of the union have it great, earn a nice salary and they don't give a fuck about its members in reality.

If you're going to answer a question with a question - how about provide some sources of the assertions you provided?
What is "Black police officers association"? I can believe they're some sort of a union, but what do they actually do? Maybe they are a racist organization, I don't know - you're the one bringing them up. Do you actually know anything about them, or are you just saying things you reckon should be true? How do you know for example, that most of them make more money monthly than I do in a year? Are you saying black police officers in UK earn over £250k a month? That sounds dubious. Source, please.

Sounds like another one, in Belgium.

A man attacked police officers while shouting Allahu Akhbar.

The guy was shot but is still alive unfortunately.