(August 10, 2016 at 3:12 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Oh look.... the same fucking thing I first posted. Don't see anyone jumping all over this though.



Typical.

/sarcasm

Oh dear god seriously wtf is it today. I'm out

(August 11, 2016 at 2:19 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:

(August 10, 2016 at 3:12 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Oh look.... the same fucking thing I first posted. Don't see anyone jumping all over this though.



Typical.

/sarcasm

... but who jumped all over your first post?

Several people, actually.

But I'm stepping out of this thread because it's way too intense in here anyway.

(August 11, 2016 at 2:16 pm)Losty Wrote:

(August 11, 2016 at 2:13 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: So, let me get this straight. You don't think it's wrong, yet you think it should be enforceable?

Correct

Quote:Why enforce it then, if you don't think it's wrong? Sounds to me like you'd want something to be a choice rather than a rule, if you don't think it's wrong.

Well then it sounds wrong to you because that's not how I feel at all. I don't think laws and morals should be connected and for the most part I think laws and morals are not connected.

Quote:But let's imagine no one registers their vehicles, because like you, they don't think it's wrong, and they get away with it. What happens then?

And let's imagine we allowed a certain territory on earth where no rules apply(so you have no society). What would then happen?

Failing to see the point of this...

If you're not going to give me straight answers, there can be no point of it, nor there can be any meaningful conversation to be had.

So you decide when you want to talk about it, come back and answer those questions in a meaningful way.

You know, your endless beating of the dead horse isn't exactly productive. There have been simple and comprehensive answers to your question. You failing to see or to appreciate them does nothing to invalidate the points being made.

(August 11, 2016 at 3:22 pm)abaris Wrote: You know, your endless beating of the dead horse isn't exactly productive. There have been simple and comprehensive answers to your question. You failing to see or to appreciate them does nothing to invalidate the points being made.

It was all equivocations and you're more than biased to see it. You just happen to agree with her.

Anyway, I'm not interested in talking to two people at once.

I find it quite remarkable that you seem to be the only one who sees it that way.

(August 11, 2016 at 3:38 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: I find it quite remarkable that you seem to be the only one who sees it that way.

Can't help you there. Maybe read her second and third answers to my questions again. Maybe, just maybe, you'll see it too.


I ask her something. She fails to answer it, goes on a tangent.

I ask her something else, she flatly declares she doesn't want to answer because she doesn't see the point in doing so.

I can't force the conversation forward. There's only so much you can talk for both people involved in the conversation at once before that other person starts complaining you're putting words in their mouths.

(August 11, 2016 at 3:42 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: Can't help you there. Maybe read her second and third answers to my questions again. Maybe, just maybe, you'll see it too.

Maybe it says about you a lot more than about Losty that you felt the necessity of second and third questions, since your first one has been already and repeatedly answered.