Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Sure, I was saying that even if he is right it doesn't make any difference to anything. Of course he is not right.
Posts: 2009
Threads: 2
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation:
26
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 10:22 am
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams? Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 10:24 am
TheBorg... what are you on? [emoji13]
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 10:26 am
(August 17, 2016 at 10:22 am)LostLocke Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams? Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?
He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 10:47 am
(August 17, 2016 at 9:07 am)Alex K Wrote: Lol. Relying on Russian internet source that has determined mass loss for dead people. What could possibly go wrong 
Considering the Holodomor, I'm pretty sure even the Russians would admit that mass loss precedes death.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 10:53 am
(August 17, 2016 at 8:52 am)theBorg Wrote: The energy of Hiroshima atomic explosion is the 0.7 gram. The lost of weight during human death ranges from 2.5 to 22.4 gram (the Russian Internet Resource, and I think, that any natural leak of matter was considered and calculated). So, the really the supernatural thing is happening.
Well, either that or you're just easily confused.
Posts: 2009
Threads: 2
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation:
26
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 11:00 am
(This post was last modified: August 17, 2016 at 11:00 am by LostLocke.)
(August 17, 2016 at 10:26 am)Alex K Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 10:22 am)LostLocke Wrote: Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?
He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT Ah, he means the output, not the "stuff" inside, huh?
On that note, is there a way to figure out about what type of device or 'thing' would yield 0.7 grams?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 12:29 pm
(This post was last modified: August 17, 2016 at 12:36 pm by Alex K.)
(August 17, 2016 at 11:00 am)LostLocke Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 10:26 am)Alex K Wrote: He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT Ah, he means the output, not the "stuff" inside, huh?
On that note, is there a way to figure out about what type of device or 'thing' would yield 0.7 grams?
Yes, in Nuclear fusion, something like couple of permille of mass energy is converted to blast energy, for fission it is a bit less. Look up that number for a device and divide .7 grams by it. E.g., if we assume 1 permille conversion just for concreteness, .7g energy output would correspond to an H-Bomb with 700g tritium or lithium or so in it (which sounds like little, so we're maybe not dealing with an fusion bomb... idk).
You could use Wolfram Alpha to directly convert 0.7 grams * c^2 into kilotons TNT...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 101
Threads: 13
Joined: August 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 1:38 pm
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This is either just a product of the english-as-a-second-language barrier, or one of the most obvious Poe's I've seen in a while - especially considering the extremely short post length.
The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?
Just because your worldview is under the test - I am the Poe??? The humankind has come to mass conservation in very clever experiments: mass always conserves in chemical reactions. Why then nobody cares to weight the dying person and his matter-leaks???
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
August 17, 2016 at 2:16 pm
(August 17, 2016 at 1:38 pm)theBorg Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This is either just a product of the english-as-a-second-language barrier, or one of the most obvious Poe's I've seen in a while - especially considering the extremely short post length.
The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?
Just because your worldview is under the test - I am the Poe??? The humankind has come to mass conservation in very clever experiments: mass always conserves in chemical reactions. Why then nobody cares to weight the dying person and his matter-leaks???
Because it's made up
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
