(August 27, 2016 at 8:12 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:

(August 27, 2016 at 8:04 pm)ScienceAf Wrote: Well. Sin does mean sin so yeah. I believe in grammatical evolution.

Remember... I'm 12. My vocab ain't so good.

I don't.  I believe in grammatical creation (). In other words if you need a new description, make a new word or composite word.  In todays "grammatical evolution" the word 'literally' now has a definition that is the exact opposite of literal. "That art piece literally took my breath away."  Stahp that, no it didn't and you're lying, it probably inspired you.

Sin in archery means to hit the target but not the central bullseye, the point of it all. Mastery of trajectory.
The only punishment is you have to shoot again, and again until you are "sinless" and can pass to the next target/event.

gg... You got me.

(August 27, 2016 at 8:12 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:

(August 27, 2016 at 8:04 pm)ScienceAf Wrote: Well. Sin does mean sin so yeah. I believe in grammatical evolution.

Remember... I'm 12. My vocab ain't so good.

I don't.  I believe in grammatical creation (). In other words if you need a new description, make a new word or composite word.  In todays "grammatical evolution" the word 'literally' now has a definition that is the exact opposite of literal. "That art piece literally took my breath away."

What you are talking about isn't the evolution of language. It's the acceptance of linguistic democracy, even when the majority of a culture (I'm talking specifically about American English speakers) are uneducated morons.

This is not evolutionary, it's revolutionary. "The word doesn't mean that. Still doesn't mean that. Okay, I guess enough idiots have used the word that way, let's put it in the dictionary."

(August 27, 2016 at 11:15 pm)bennyboy Wrote:

(August 27, 2016 at 8:12 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I don't.  I believe in grammatical creation (). In other words if you need a new description, make a new word or composite word.  In todays "grammatical evolution" the word 'literally' now has a definition that is the exact opposite of literal. "That art piece literally took my breath away."

What you are talking about isn't the evolution of language.  It's the acceptance of linguistic democracy, even when the majority of a culture (I'm talking specifically about American English speakers) are uneducated morons.

This is not evolutionary, it's revolutionary.  "The word doesn't mean that.  Still doesn't mean that.  Okay, I guess enough idiots have used the word that way, let's put it in the dictionary."

Thanks for the details, but it sounds like the telephone game that never get backs around the circle.

I prefer original objective meanings as intended by the original users/makers of words. But of course also allow room for what ever people want to mean subjectively. How else would I see the change/growth/loss of conceptualization through time? How else will I know how I've been influenced by roots hidden under the surface of the past?

(August 28, 2016 at 1:06 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I prefer original objective meanings as intended by the original users/makers of words.  But of course also allow room for what ever people want to mean subjectively.  How else would I see the change/growth/loss of conceptualization through time?  How else will I know how I've been influenced by roots hidden under the surface of the past?

Knowing what people mean, and knowing what a word means, aren't the same thing. As for me, I refuse to acknowledge false meanings of words, as language by democracy leads only to chaos.

(August 28, 2016 at 1:51 am)bennyboy Wrote:

(August 28, 2016 at 1:06 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I prefer original objective meanings as intended by the original users/makers of words.  But of course also allow room for what ever people want to mean subjectively.  How else would I see the change/growth/loss of conceptualization through time?  How else will I know how I've been influenced by roots hidden under the surface of the past?

Knowing what people mean, and knowing what a word means, aren't the same thing.  As for me, I refuse to acknowledge false meanings of words, as language by democracy leads only to chaos.

I can appreciate your stance. Would you mind sharing your perspective on the word "faith"?

(August 27, 2016 at 1:50 pm)ScienceAf Wrote:

(August 27, 2016 at 9:51 am)Little Rik Wrote: Success in life is not easy son.
You can climb the step to success one by one and that it takes ages or you can take some risk hoping it paid off.
The best way however is to follow those who got there already so you avoid the dangers and risks.
That is exactly what I have done.
You on the other end follow a way full of risks.
Money do not fall from trees.
To think that the universe pop up as per magic and our consciousness appeared as per magic is like to think that the money fall from the trees.
People like you live in a fantasy world that doesn't exist.
Get real son before you sink deeper in the hole of nothingness.  

I honestly can't tell if you're joking...

I live in a fantasy world?
I'm sinking into nothing?
Where the hell did this sadistic god come from?
The sequence of the universe(s) is perhaps infinite whilst God is simply a figment of the mind.
Pleasing for it awnsers all the questions of life, but they are the wrong awnsers.

And I know succses is not easy. Not as well as anyone older than me. But I know.

Where did I bring up the fact the money falls from trees?

Just think about what you read critically. Very very critically.

And never listen to the modern bible, for it is a forgery. If you're gonna be a Christian, then read the Ingel sometime.

Boy.  

You clearly do not realize but you are in a total mental mess.
Don't worry too much however.
You are not alone especially here on AF.  

If you don't believe in God then why you claim that such a non existing entity create so many problems for so many people?

You never thought about that Af, did you?  
Don't you think it is stupid to pretend that nobody can create problems?

Now let us come to the second question in which you ask me where did you bring up the fact the money falls from trees?

This is the classical atheist dogma.
According to atheism there is no God so what exist and the consciousness that we got it pop up as per magic
and we don't own to anyone.
In other words according to atheist thinking we never struggle to build this consciousness which can be compared as money falling from a tree.

Get it now?

Life however teach us that nothing come for free.
Only fools believe that what we got come for free.  

Ah Rik, you never fail to make me laugh.

(August 28, 2016 at 8:11 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Ah Rik, you never fail to make me laugh.  

I am glad that you laugh.
I on the other hand feel like crying and sick  by looking at your avatar.

Would you change your avatar if I give you $$$?  

(August 28, 2016 at 8:19 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(August 28, 2016 at 8:11 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Ah Rik, you never fail to make me laugh.  

I am glad that you laugh.
I on the other hand feel like crying and sick  by looking at your avatar.

Would you change your avatar if I give you $$$?  

It's almost like you don't want America to be great again.    

(August 28, 2016 at 8:21 am)Bella Morte Wrote:

(August 28, 2016 at 8:19 am)Little Rik Wrote: I am glad that you laugh.
I on the other hand feel like crying and sick  by looking at your avatar.

Would you change your avatar if I give you $$$?  

It's almost like you don't want America to be great again.    

Gee, I didn't know that America was ever great.
What I know is that America has been very good in exploiting people and resources all over the planet.
That has really nothing to do with being great.
You are only great when you create progress with your own hard work not by exploiting others and other resources.
All Trump want to do is continue this mad capitalistic run and keep alive a skeleton called capitalism.