Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 1:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another apologist with his "clever" questions
#91
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 26, 2016 at 2:59 am)FallentoReason Wrote:
Arkilogue Wrote:ow do you logically marry "God creates" with the 1st law of thermodynamics? (energy cannot be created nor destroyed)

God creating a universe doesn't violate any scientific law, since scientific laws live within the yet-to-be-created universe.

So magic fairy beans or special pleading all the way down?
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply
#92
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 26, 2016 at 11:46 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(October 26, 2016 at 1:23 am)FallentoReason Wrote: God being god, he can make whatever proposition true. In the universe next door, the resident God said 2 + 2 would equal 5, and they tell me it's logical over there. 

No serious Christian theologian would recognize any such God.

Are you saying there could only have been one set of logical rules? The ones of this universe?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#93
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 26, 2016 at 2:15 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:
(October 26, 2016 at 2:59 am)FallentoReason Wrote: God creating a universe doesn't violate any scientific law, since scientific laws live within the yet-to-be-created universe.

So magic fairy beans or special pleading all the way down?

No. Just the fact you were putting the cart before the horse.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#94
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
Pointless gamesmanship.  OFC there could be different rules in a different universe.  If things were different....things would be different.

However, they wouldn't be -logical- rules, because that term refers to these rules, here. Come up with your own name to refer to whatever rules you've imagined the god you've imagined plays by in whatever alternate universe you've imagined. There's simply no point in trying to steal the credibility of the term logical for the contents of your fantasies.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#95
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 26, 2016 at 9:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Pointless gamesmanship.  OFC there could be different rules in a different universe.  If things were different....things would be different.

However, they wouldn't be -logical- rules, because that term refers to these rules, here.  Come up with your own name to refer to whatever rules you've imagined the god you've imagined plays by in whatever alternate universe you've imagined.  There's simply no point in trying to steal the credibility of the term logical for the contents of your fantasies.

Why change the label? I mean to say what the term "logical" means. Its reference is the meaning I'm conveying when describing other universes. You can't push me back from wanting to grab that meaning and use it in order to construct an argument. Call it goblygoop if it makes the point get across, doesn't matter.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#96
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 26, 2016 at 9:42 pm)FallentoReason Wrote:
(October 26, 2016 at 2:15 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: So magic fairy beans or special pleading all the way down?

No. Just the fact you were putting the cart before the horse.

You seem to be asserting a lawless God, that intentionally creates/composes a very specific law abiding universe...ex nihilo?
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply
#97
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 27, 2016 at 2:16 am)Arkilogue Wrote:
(October 26, 2016 at 9:42 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: No. Just the fact you were putting the cart before the horse.

You seem to be asserting a lawless God,

I don't see any other alternative? I'm not sure what a god that has laws governing it means. I don't think any theist would pose that as an option.

Quote: that intentionally creates/composes a very specific law abiding universe...ex nihilo?

Sure, why not?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#98
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 27, 2016 at 2:19 am)FallentoReason Wrote:
(October 27, 2016 at 2:16 am)Arkilogue Wrote: You seem to be asserting a lawless God,

I don't see any other alternative? I'm not sure what a god that has laws governing it means. I don't think any theist would pose that as an option.

Quote: that intentionally creates/composes a very specific law abiding universe...ex nihilo?

Sure, why not?
The alternative is a logical God of real substance that produces the Logos, unfolding all it's inherent qualities from a unified infinite state to a differentiated finite state by creating space within itself, starting "time". Our time down here.

If you have a God that can create any universe it wants, and composes this one, retaining the power to change any part of it willy nilly...it paints the subjective nature of God in a very negative light as many atheist here have been detailing.

But if you have an objective God that unfolds the space for a universe and lofts it's own inherent qualities as the forces/fields/conditions within it...then it says nothing about the subjective nature of God, the universe could have worked out no other way, it behaves naturally and orderly because it was produced naturally and orderly. It wasn't created, it was procreated. The operation is more fundamental than special mental planning.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply
#99
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 27, 2016 at 2:59 am)Arkilogue Wrote:
(October 27, 2016 at 2:19 am)FallentoReason Wrote: I don't see any other alternative? I'm not sure what a god that has laws governing it means. I don't think any theist would pose that as an option.


Sure, why not?
The alternative is a logical God of real substance that produces the Logos, unfolding all it's inherent qualities from a unified infinite state to a differentiated finite state by creating space within itself, starting "time". Our time down here.

I don't know *how* it would pragmatically create a universe, but that's beside the point.

Quote:If you have a God that can create any universe it wants, and composes this one, retaining the power to change any part of it willy nilly...it paints the subjective nature of God in a very negative light as many atheist here have been detailing.

Nowhere have I said it would change an already existing universe.

Quote:But if you have an objective God that unfolds the space for a universe and lofts it's own inherent qualities as the forces/fields/conditions within it...then it says nothing about the subjective nature of God, the universe could have worked out no other way, it behaves naturally and orderly because it was produced naturally and orderly. It wasn't created, it was procreated. The operation is more fundamental than special mental planning.

This is borderline pantheism. I don't see any reason why a god has to lay itself down as the physical laws. Having a creative god which creates something aside from itself isn't a worry. For the set of all possible universes, it has to eventually choose to make one of them, and that chosen universe is what it is.

Put another way: who's to say that a universe can't exist without gravity? Who knows, maybe there's a set of laws that creates a perfectly coherent universe that has no notion of gravity, or even Newtonian physics. Our minds are too small to even begin comprehending what that could be like, but it doesn't mean it's logically incorrect.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
RE: Another apologist with his "clever" questions
(October 27, 2016 at 3:32 am)FallentoReason Wrote: I don't know *how* it would pragmatically create a universe, but that's beside the point.

This is borderline pantheism. I don't see any reason why a god has to lay itself down as the physical laws. Having a creative god which creates something aside from itself isn't a worry. For the set of all possible universes, it has to eventually choose to make one of them, and that chosen universe is what it is.

Put another way: who's to say that a universe can't exist without gravity? Who knows, maybe there's a set of laws that creates a perfectly coherent universe that has no notion of gravity, or even Newtonian physics. Our minds are too small to even begin comprehending what that could be like, but it doesn't mean it's logically incorrect.

How is easy. Energetic self expression: "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God" or if you prefer the Egyptian account "I am the Eternal...I am that which created the Word....I am the Word." It expressed self existence. This was a pro-creative act as the original infinite GOD(Father) forms/"Words" a new finite individuation of itself into being. The self begotten "Son of God" (God the Son). In order for the Son to exist separate from the Father space must be created between them. That is the space of the universe. This was the first act.

It also works in the lab and it's called acoustic cavitation; sounds waves in water can create a stable vacuum bubble, a void space "ex nihilo" where there was none before...just add vibration. It also produces light, look up sono-luminescence.

It also hold true to the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics: Nothing new is created (matter is just separated) and to make the space, the substance of God undergoes an equal and opposing reaction. It contracts both outwards and inwards, away from the bubble space of the universe, to it's center and periphery.

Gravity is inherent in an infinite (forever in all directions) absolute (taking up all available space) God of pure mass, pure matter.......not these 99.99999999999% non material atoms.


Look up panentheism.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James Randi deserves his own RIP thread. Brian37 27 2994 January 6, 2021 at 11:39 am
Last Post: RozzerusUnrelentus
  A very clever alien.. R00tKiT 85 10895 January 4, 2021 at 10:10 am
Last Post: RozzerusUnrelentus
  His wish sounds familiar purplepurpose 1 1037 November 16, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Matt Dilahunty On What Would Change His Mind About God Edwardo Piet 14 5850 January 29, 2017 at 1:12 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
Video God Just Changed His Mind (from Evil to Good) Mental Outlaw 51 16225 April 16, 2015 at 8:41 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Big Name NFL Athlete Asserts his Atheism FatAndFaithless 41 15394 January 21, 2015 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Chas
Thumbs Up Man who wore colander on his head for licence photo says it is part of Church of FSM MountainsWinAgain 19 5972 June 24, 2014 at 8:13 am
Last Post: RobbyPants
  Will a sign from God will convince us of his existence? Lawman 51 10348 March 24, 2014 at 8:34 pm
Last Post: tor
  Would atheist worship The biblical God if his existence was proven? Sinnersburninhell100 110 27975 January 13, 2014 at 6:32 pm
Last Post: JuliaL
  Clever answers for all occasions A_Nony_Mouse 20 5312 April 11, 2013 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)