(November 6, 2016 at 5:25 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:

(November 6, 2016 at 5:05 am)purplepurpose Wrote: On topic of God you can only speculate, as atheists here like to point out. If you like particular theory it doesnt make it necessarily true.

ProgrammingGod, you might be just bag of chemicals, which laso happen to have counsciousness.

I need not speculate.


Prominent Statistical Evidence:


Non-omniscient Gods/non trivial creators (brain based models) are likely on the horizon of Moore's Law..., at 2020's boundary....

Such shall likely occur, absent human extinction....

Likely in any topic means something below 100%. There IS a chance that you will die and sease to exist permenantly in the end.

Just to be clear (which I know you're all about) simple yes or no: are you talking about simulation theory?

I get it.

He's been reading what Elon Musk said about computer simulation, if you remember we thrashed this out a while back.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=elo...&FORM=VIRE

Translation: Intelligent life inevitably develops AI and/or gains the ability to create simulated universes, these "gods" create simulated realities which inevitably produce intelligent life, which evolves to the point of "godhood" and it can run simulations, so on and forth. That's all he's saying. That and some crap about some other crap, I don't know I don't care.

Already explained to him that running the Matrix only makes you 'god' in a figurative sense, and only in relative comparison. Whole thing seemed to pass him by without notice so I lost interest.

Either a troll or a moron. Sickly discolouration in the font lends to the former.

So let me get this straight... we have a bodybuilding atheist programming "God" who doesn't believe in gods but thinks theistic gods are prominent provided we redefine smart people who make robots to be gods?

Makes perfect sense.

P.S. Oh almost forgot: And he likes colors.

(November 6, 2016 at 7:02 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: So let me get this straight... we have a bodybuilding atheist programming "God" who doesn't believe in gods but thinks theistic gods are prominent provided we redefine smart people who make robots to be gods?

Makes perfect sense.

P.S. Oh almost forgot: And he likes colors.

[*A*]
I needn't think of theistic gods' prominence.


Statistically, religion, and thereafter, descriptions of the omniscient, omnipotent God persist prominently, regardless of thoughts of mine.

[*B*]
One needn't BELIEF/faith such that one observes PROBABILITIES.

Thereafter, the non omniscient, non omnipotent God/non trivial creator is PROBABLE.

Dude, if you believe gods probably exist you're a theist. "Oh but I don't believe in the gods themselves I just believe in their high probability of existing" that doesn't work, lol. You're a theist

(November 6, 2016 at 7:16 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Dude, if you believe gods probably exist you'er a theist.

Nonsense. 
I have not any beliefs.

The non omniscient God/creator is PROBABLE.
One need not BELIEF such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

[*B*]
No HIGH probabilities are stipulated of mine.

If you believe something is probable you believe it more than not believe it. You're a theist.

You do have beliefs. You believe you're right, for starters. But you're wrong.

Everyone has beliefs. Belief =/= religious belief.