|
DEBATE: Frodo Vs Kyu
|
Okay, have both parties agreed on the topic yet?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you 
 RE: DEBATE: Frodo Vs Kyu
April 20, 2009 at 4:31 am
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2009 at 4:31 am by g-mark.)
Interesting. 42 replies and we are yet to reach the start line.
 RE: DEBATE: Frodo Vs Kyu
April 20, 2009 at 4:44 am
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2009 at 4:45 am by Kyuuketsuki.)
(April 20, 2009 at 3:25 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Okay, have both parties agreed on the topic yet? One party has  (April 20, 2009 at 4:31 am)g-mark Wrote: Interesting. 42 replies and we are yet to reach the start line. I can't do much else to accelerate the process than I have. Kyu Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings! Come over to the dark side, we have cookies! Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator 
Sometimes it's just the way things are.
(April 20, 2009 at 4:44 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: One party has In fact Leo (given that the debate was my challenge to Frodo, that I have remained consistent throughout about what I want to debate and still wish to debate) I think perhaps that you should now liaise with Frodo to establish whether he will accept that, the proposed rules etc. and, if not, what he would rather debate so there's some chance we can move on to establish a starting date. As far as I am concerned we're all set to go awaiting only the organisational aspects and the go from you Kyu Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings! Come over to the dark side, we have cookies! Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator  
H0ary H0bbit Religious Views: “Never to suffer would never to have been blessed.” - Edgar Allan Poe
I think I'm ok to go. I'm unclear as to how my possible non defense issues that may arise fall into the rules of the debate and that I'm free to make such points. If Kyu quotes purely scientific evidence and I accept none, is that ok. And If I present theological evidence in response then is Kyu justified in not refuting that evidence due to the debate title?
So that we are straight on this.
The topic proposed by Kyu is "God(s), Science & Evidence", is that agreed by you Fr0d0, since you said you wouldn't in post #12? All points raised by the opponent should be addressed, and can either be conceded or refuted. Both the arguments and their responses have to be relevant to the debate.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
H0ary H0bbit Religious Views: “Never to suffer would never to have been blessed.” - Edgar Allan Poe
Yup yup... let's do it
Okay. Adrian, can you set up a thread in the debate area for Fr0d0, Kyu, and me?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
