(December 13, 2016 at 11:46 am)Atheist_BG Wrote: Looks like you're the same imbecile as those morons who don't know what a race is. I was thinking about hacking your account in order to make you even gladder but it's not worthy to get my hands dirty with a filth like yourself.

LOL... Whatever you say, you fascist little dim-wit...

(December 13, 2016 at 11:46 am)Atheist_BG Wrote: Here, educate your empty bucket with some info about what a race is: http://i.imgur.com/7fb0Js1.png There's no Polandoid race.

I think you're mistaking me for someone who gives a f*ck. You're the moron who gets banned (from where? I'll bet it was a pornsite...) for being "racist" against a group of people, who are not a race... Of course - judging by your posts on this site - you most likely said something worse than calling someone "polish" and now you're simply lying about it. Maybe something about killing all the Gypsies?...

Anyway - LOL... Run along now, child...

(December 13, 2016 at 11:28 am)Kosh Wrote: I'm calling an eye for an eye here.  Make the kids eat some semen in front of the class.

And if they feel awkward about eating their cum, they can serve their cum to me. X3

Indecent assault's not a "prank"...It's assault.

The "kids" ruined their own reputations when they determined to teach 'ole gal a lesson, by forcing her to come into direct contact with their seminal fluid without her knowledge or consent. They didn't rape the woman in the technical/legal sense, but, they clearly violated her in a sexual manner by making her "swallow their load" against her will. The incident wasn't a matter of "boys being boys"/general tomfoolery, and shouldn't have been taken lightly. 

Those "kids' have some serious goddamned issues.

Pool, it's kind of gross that you think cumming in someone's food is some innocent prank. It's fucking disgusting and far worse than some shit like a whoopie cushion. Moreover, I'm fairly certain they didn't mean to prank their teacher. Jerking off into someone's food is malicious and sadistic, not cute and funny. They're fucked up little bastards and deserve to have a hard time of it.

(December 13, 2016 at 12:59 pm)paulpablo Wrote:

(December 13, 2016 at 11:45 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: They pulled a stupid and dangerous prank, but it is NOT rape. Nor do I think the law needs to get involved here, the parents and teachers should take care of this, and at most the boys can be expelled if an example needs to be set.

I think people on this thread are swinging in some crazy directions from charging these guys with rape to not getting the law involved at all.

The prank they did was a crime, they committed a stupid and dangerous crime.  

The two things that have to be taken into consideration is the woman's physical health and the potential risk of stds.

The woman's mental trauma and how that might affect her career working in this place where it's well known news now that she ate the spunk of these guys.

It's obviously not rape but there's an undeniable sexual element to the prank which makes it more serious.

I love this community specifically because of such varied opinions.

Anyway, yes it is serious, and I am not saying it isn't. But I don't see the prank been done with criminal intent. I am not discounting this as "boys being boys", rather I don't think they should be punished for the perceived potential damage they might've done, rather they should be punished for what they already did. Tell me how does a misdemeanor charge, or even a food tampering/poisoning charge help more than an expulsion and counseling? A slap-on-the-wrist by law enforcement would simply embolden them and others like them

I'm with Vorlon on this one. What those teens was a severe sexual violation of their teacher's person, and yet they're getting a tap on the wrist.

Not alone is it sending out the wrong message to the soon to be men, it is sending the wrong message to future victims of sexual assault.

(December 14, 2016 at 11:49 am)Aoi Magi Wrote:

(December 13, 2016 at 12:59 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I think people on this thread are swinging in some crazy directions from charging these guys with rape to not getting the law involved at all.

The prank they did was a crime, they committed a stupid and dangerous crime.  

The two things that have to be taken into consideration is the woman's physical health and the potential risk of stds.

The woman's mental trauma and how that might affect her career working in this place where it's well known news now that she ate the spunk of these guys.

It's obviously not rape but there's an undeniable sexual element to the prank which makes it more serious.

I love this community specifically because of such varied opinions.

Anyway, yes it is serious, and I am not saying it isn't. But I don't see the prank been done with criminal intent. I am not discounting this as "boys being boys", rather I don't think they should be punished for the perceived potential damage they might've done, rather they should be punished for what they already did. Tell me how does a misdemeanor charge, or even a food tampering/poisoning charge help more than an expulsion and counseling? A slap-on-the-wrist by law enforcement would simply embolden them and others like them

I don't really have enough info to go on but I will say.........

It depends on their ages, I doubt they're too young to know about STD's, hygiene, the fact that cumming in food and giving it to a teacher is wrong.
It depends on their attitudes in general.  If they're taking pool's stance that it's a funny joke and she should have just pranked them back then I'd say punishment definitely needs to be escalated.
If they're genuinely sorry for what they did and there's character witnesses who can back them up or maybe the teacher even forgives them for what they did then yeh I can see expulsion might be alright or whatever other slight punishment.
If there's counseling involved then the parents should have to pay for it.  They should have taught their children that cumming in a teachers food might have very harsh consequences.
Unless this is some kind of poverty case where the parents aren't around much.
To me I predict these guys just watch too much jackass on MTV or something and thought this extreme prank would be cool.  You don't need some guy with thick rimmed glasses and a hipster beard drinking a frapachino being paid to council these guys.  No counselling needs to be done.  It's ridiculous to suggest kids now need to be taught by state paid counselors not to cum in food.

(December 13, 2016 at 9:39 pm)pool the great Wrote: Heh, yours is officially the worst place for boys to grow up if they are guaranteed to have their life ruined (that's 60+ years) over a stupid prank (that probably took 5 mins). Why can't the teacher just be an adult and prank them back? That way everyone's happy

20 bucks says that teacher is determined to make sure to ruin the kids reputation so bad they never make another dime in their lives. Fantastic

Where are you from?  India?  It's not a "prank" when sexual miscreants victimize someone.  It's often a sign of deeper predatory issues.

(December 13, 2016 at 9:39 pm)pool the great Wrote: Heh, yours is officially the worst place for boys to grow up if they are guaranteed to have their life ruined (that's 60+ years) over a stupid prank (that probably took 5 mins). Why can't the teacher just be an adult and prank them back? That way everyone's happy

20 bucks says that teacher is determined to make sure to ruin the kids reputation so bad they never make another dime in their lives. Fantastic

Yeah, pranking them back is totally what adults do.

What fantasy world do you live in again?

Yeah, she should totally just stick some candy in her vagina and then hand it out to the kids! That'll teach them.