SteelCurtain Wrote:First of all, you are making it seem like even if the law about rape excludes females from being charged with specifically rape, that they would just walk off free without being charged with any crime.

When a woman rape someone she should get charged with rape. Period.

Quote:Forced sexual intercourse including both psychological coercion as well as physical force. Forced sexual intercourse means vaginal, anal or oral penetration by the offender (s). This category also includes incidents where the penetration is from a foreign object such as a bottle.Includes attempted rapes, male as well as female victims, and both heterosexual and same sex rape. Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.

The first definition I quoted from Wikipedia isn't much different from this. Both require penetration of some kind for a unsolicited sexual act to be considered rape. How exactly would a female rapist that ride a passed out man be convicted for rape? There is no penetration which according to common sense can only be done with a penis and not a vagina. Hence why I said female rapists are legally protected.

Quote:I still do not see how this is a 'left' or 'right' issue.

It isn't. I said extreme leftists support these types of laws not leftists.

Again, we're drifting off subject, my point was that extreme leftists ideas are far more mainstream than extreme rightist ideas, in fact, I don't think there is a single mainstream extreme rightist idea floating around since forever, which is good, just that the left extremists shouldn't have their crazy ideas floating around either.

(December 27, 2016 at 12:26 pm)abaris Wrote:

(December 27, 2016 at 12:21 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Can you link to this law, please?

He already did.

Yeah, I got that far and updated my post.

(December 27, 2016 at 1:53 pm)pool the great Wrote: It isn't. I said extreme leftists support these types of laws not leftists.

OK, so you say extreme leftists are in support of that. That's up for debate, since I never heard any extreme leftist turning this into a talking point.

But, for fuck's sake, I even hand you that. If you answer me this one question, since you quoted UK legislation. Which extreme leftist pressure group was able to turn this into law? Am I not aware of some Marxist government having been in power and strong enough to enforce this bill.

(December 27, 2016 at 1:53 pm)pool the great Wrote:

SteelCurtain Wrote:First of all, you are making it seem like even if the law about rape excludes females from being charged with specifically rape, that they would just walk off free without being charged with any crime.

When a woman rape someone she should get charged with rape. Period.

It should be noted that this type of behavior on the part of women is extremely rare.

SteelCurtain Wrote:Which is a more serious specification of rape. Literally. That charge will land her on a higher tier of sexual offender than rape, if/when she gets out of jail. Not only that, but most places have specific sections of their penal codes dealing with offenses against children. So because the boy was 13, she wouldn't even be up for the same charges. Come on, pool.

Irrelevant. You asked for an instance of a female rapist not being charged of rape (as if it's a rare thing) and I delivered.

Quote:By your logic, no one, male or female, could ever be charged with rape in the State of Texas.

Not by my logic, I didn't write the penal code. Sexual assault as a general term can encompass rape but not the other way around hence why rape is not sexual assault, besides you already admitted Texas penal code was one of the most backwards one, why don't you find a more modern one then?