If there are no official Statistics then it's still lying to say you have the largest. It's no else's job  to show it's false. It's there job to have those statists before making the claim

 Your excuses are getting boring

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:30 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Nuh-uh KellyAnne. Answer the fucking question or at the very least acknowledge the fact that you spoke out of your ass.

I spoke out of my ass.

Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?

Probably not, but neither is it demonstrable correct. The point is that Trump and his cronies are excoriating the media for accurate reporting, and that should strike you as terrifying.

Boru

(January 22, 2017 at 6:39 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: I spoke out of my ass.

Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017...mates.html

Demonstrably, yes.

Oh no steel that's fake news because it's not kissing trumps ass "Alternate fact"

(January 22, 2017 at 6:28 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:11 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Lol. You didn't watch the press conference did you. The press conference was called specifically to comment on the inauguration. The dude made a specific comment directly addressing the media's coverage and reporting about the numbers of people there. There is no way on earth anyone who actually saw the press conference could call that an offhand comment.

Also, let's dispense with the idea that anything bad that Trump's administration does cannot be called the responsibility of Donald J. Trump. I've spent 8 years listening to the same stuff on the other side.

Curiously, is there any real statistics on the attendance of the inaugeration?

Such facts as there are indicate that the WLB and his Goebbels class propagandists are full of fucking shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/22/us/po...ss&emc=rss

Quote:5. Mr. Spicer said that Washington’s Metro system had greater ridership on Friday than it did for Mr. Obama’s 2013 inauguration. “We know that 420,000 people used the D.C. Metro public transit yesterday, which actually compares to 317,000 that used it for President Obama’s last inaugural,” Mr. Spicer said.
Neither number is correct, according to the transit system, which reported 570,557 entries into the rail system on Friday, compared with 782,000 on Inauguration Day in 2013.
6. Mr. Spicer said that “this was the first time in our nation’s history that floor coverings have been used to protect the grass on the Mall. That had the effect of highlighting any areas where people were not standing, while in years past the grass eliminated this visual.”
In fact, similar coverings were used during the 2013 inauguration to protect the grass. The coverings did not hamper analyses of the crowd size.
7. Mr. Spicer said that it was “the first time that fencing and magnetometers went as far back on the Mall, preventing hundreds of thousands of people from being able to access the Mall as quickly as they had in inaugurations past.”
The Secret Service said security measures were largely unchanged this year. There were also few reports of long lines or delays.

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?

Look at the picture comparisons. They speak for themselves.



Obama 2009

(January 22, 2017 at 6:42 pm)Orochi Wrote: If there are no official Statistics then it's still lying to say you have the largest. It's no else's job  to show it's false. It's there job to have those statists before making the claim

 Your excuses are getting boring

I haven't excused anything. I admitted that it wasn't an offhand comment. You're delusional as usual.

(January 22, 2017 at 6:53 pm)abaris Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?

Look at the picture comparisons. They speak for themselves.



Obama 2009

I know there are these picture comparisons. However from what I understand trump and the gang are basically saying that simply showing comparing two pictures doesn't prove anything; That One picture could have captured the event when it wasn't at its largest and then been deliberately used for comparison to one that was

Quote:However from what I understand trump and the gang are basically saying that simply showing comparing two pictures doesn't prove anything;

We know that THEY are lying fucks.  Right now we are trying to decide about YOU.

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)Orochi Wrote: I don't why you guys are surprised trump could walk out on the white house lawn draped in a cloak of human skin. pledge his allegiance to Putin . knife a nun  and burn a children's hospital down.  While quoting hitler speeches then demand the first child of ever household be placed in bondage to him. While masturbating to human sacrifice. And then have a puppy for dinner .And canofmountaindew ,Pool, A Theist ,Reptile, and the rest of the asserted trump fan boys would cry fake news or whatever other lame excuse they need to maintain the delusion trumps a good president.

---

Meanwhile the very OP of this thread is literally propagating a false story.

top kek.

---

(January 22, 2017 at 7:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:However from what I understand trump and the gang are basically saying that simply showing comparing two pictures doesn't prove anything;

We know that THEY are lying fucks.  Right now we are trying to decide about YOU.

No need to decide; This is a forum; The exchange is all text and it ain't going anywhere. Point out where I'm lying (excluding the mistake that I already owned.)

(January 22, 2017 at 7:06 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)Orochi Wrote: I don't why you guys are surprised trump could walk out on the white house lawn draped in a cloak of human skin. pledge his allegiance to Putin . knife a nun  and burn a children's hospital down.  While quoting hitler speeches then demand the first child of ever household be placed in bondage to him. While masturbating to human sacrifice. And then have a puppy for dinner .And canofmountaindew ,Pool, A Theist ,Reptile, and the rest of the asserted trump fan boys would cry fake news or whatever other lame excuse they need to maintain the delusion trumps a good president.

---

Meanwhile the very OP of this thread is literally propagating a false story.

top kek.

You shown it to be false ?

(January 22, 2017 at 7:06 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)Orochi Wrote: I don't why you guys are surprised trump could walk out on the white house lawn draped in a cloak of human skin. pledge his allegiance to Putin . knife a nun  and burn a children's hospital down.  While quoting hitler speeches then demand the first child of ever household be placed in bondage to him. While masturbating to human sacrifice. And then have a puppy for dinner .And canofmountaindew ,Pool, A Theist ,Reptile, and the rest of the asserted trump fan boys would cry fake news or whatever other lame excuse they need to maintain the delusion trumps a good president.

---

Meanwhile the very OP of this thread is literally propagating a false story.

top kek.

---

(January 22, 2017 at 7:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote: We know that THEY are lying fucks.  Right now we are trying to decide about YOU.

No need to decide; This is a forum; The exchange is all text and it ain't going anywhere. Point out where I'm lying (excluding the mistake that I already owned.)

You are wrong if you think credibility does not matter.  You are not covering yourself with glory here.