(February 10, 2017 at 4:41 am)Aroura Wrote:

(February 10, 2017 at 4:08 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Sorry; you don't get to tell me what my beliefs are lol.

Well, I did ask you what they were, still waiting.
And until you provide something other than what we have from you, and all I've seen is fairly hard right stuff, then what are we supposed to think?

Again, please enlighten us.  I'd really like to know about the preponderance of liberal views you hold that make you call yourself a liberal.

I don't have to prove to you anything. I'm not not-a-liberal until you're satisfied otherwise. If you want to know what a liberal is (specifically a social liberal, which I am) then Wikipedia and google are your friends. If you think I've espoused hard right views, I would suggest you be open to the idea that in fact you are just so far left that centrist views appear right.

If you support what Trump is doing, you have zero in common with the center or the left. Period, end of story. Populist authoritarianism is so far right you can't even smell the center.

(February 9, 2017 at 9:16 pm)Faith No More Wrote: I'm going to guess that stories like this are a big part of the reason for dismissing The Fail...

Quote:A former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientist criticized his colleague's data archiving methods.

This is a pretty normal scientific argument, the kind that happens in fields from climate science to psychology to linguistics.

A Daily Mail reporter wrote an article suggesting that the criticism was in fact a bombshell showing the NOAA had "duped" world leaders.

The article had some serious factual errors.

A climate science doubting congressman cited it as evidence of a conspiracy to hide data at the NOAA.

http://www.businessinsider.com/noaa-clim...ked-2017-2

My id is telling me that we should string assholes like this up in the street.

On this story specifically:

(February 10, 2017 at 4:54 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(February 10, 2017 at 4:41 am)Aroura Wrote: Well, I did ask you what they were, still waiting.
And until you provide something other than what we have from you, and all I've seen is fairly hard right stuff, then what are we supposed to think?

Again, please enlighten us.  I'd really like to know about the preponderance of liberal views you hold that make you call yourself a liberal.

I don't have to prove to you anything. I'm not not-a-liberal until you're satisfied otherwise. If you want to know what a liberal is (specifically a social liberal, which I am) then Wikipedia and google are your friends. If you think I've espoused hard right views, I would suggest you be open to the idea that in fact you are just so far left that centrist views appear right.

Well, you made a claim. I'm not alone in noting there is as of yet no evidence to support said claim.
Then you got upset when people didn't accept your claim.
You know who's job it is to prove a claim?  Until then, I'll go with the evidence, which says, you are not a liberal. 

(Also, are you claiming centrist or liberal?  Make up your mind!)

(February 10, 2017 at 4:08 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Sorry; you don't get to tell me what my beliefs are lol.

Who's telling you what your beliefs are?  Don't be stupid.  I'm telling you what you've shown here. Reading your words and seeing what posts you have given kudos to gives the impression that you are very much right-wing.  You check all the right-wing boxes, and as far as I've read, you've never made a single liberal statement.  

Like I said, if you quack like a duck...

Cans trying to claim he's a liberal lol

No  I'm a liberal. Trudeau's a liberal . Can is no liberal .

(February 9, 2017 at 3:03 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:

(February 9, 2017 at 2:17 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: How about 'Daily Shitbag That Can Only Be Called "News" By Someone With Low Standards And A Generous Disposition'?

Boru

Very creative.

So tell me, where do you get your news from?

Online news is NZ Stuff, primarily, various other sites. Print news is Irish Times and the Belly Telly.

Boru

(February 10, 2017 at 7:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(February 9, 2017 at 3:03 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Very creative.

So tell me, where do you get your news from?

Online news is NZ Stuff, primarily, various other sites.  Print news is Irish Times and the Belly Telly.

Boru

What, no love for De Paper or the Shitdependant?

(February 9, 2017 at 1:29 pm)Faith No More Wrote:

(February 9, 2017 at 1:00 pm)Assimilate Wrote: You want the answer to be left, and of course the right would believe that, they play themselves as the victims after all. The problem most people have when they pick a side is that they can't take a step backwards and objectively see all the holes. The problem is if any media outlet brings up any kind of controversy including the GOP then they scream foul, like everyone is against them. These same outlets talked about the shit show Hillary brought along as well. MSNBC, definitely left leaning, but the truth is most outlets just aren't a hard pro right. Even a 100 percent down the center news station would be deemed as a snowflaking cuck libratard cunt station.

Indeed.  The so-called "liberal mainstream media" spent three times as much time talking about Hillary's e-mails during the election than they did on all policies from both candidates combined.

And ten times that amount of time talking about whatever was the Trump scandal of the week.

(February 10, 2017 at 7:48 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: And ten times that amount of time talking about whatever was the Trump scandal of the week.

Well, what were they supposed to do? Ignore the gift that keeps on giving?