Posts: 129
Threads: 1
Joined: July 18, 2016
Reputation:
3
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 4:54 am
(February 10, 2017 at 4:41 am)Aroura Wrote: (February 10, 2017 at 4:08 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Sorry; you don't get to tell me what my beliefs are lol. Well, I did ask you what they were, still waiting.
And until you provide something other than what we have from you, and all I've seen is fairly hard right stuff, then what are we supposed to think?
Again, please enlighten us. I'd really like to know about the preponderance of liberal views you hold that make you call yourself a liberal.
I don't have to prove to you anything. I'm not not-a-liberal until you're satisfied otherwise. If you want to know what a liberal is (specifically a social liberal, which I am) then Wikipedia and google are your friends. If you think I've espoused hard right views, I would suggest you be open to the idea that in fact you are just so far left that centrist views appear right.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 5:13 am
If you support what Trump is doing, you have zero in common with the center or the left. Period, end of story. Populist authoritarianism is so far right you can't even smell the center.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 10:11 am
(February 9, 2017 at 9:16 pm)Faith No More Wrote: I'm going to guess that stories like this are a big part of the reason for dismissing The Fail...
Quote:A former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientist criticized his colleague's data archiving methods.
This is a pretty normal scientific argument, the kind that happens in fields from climate science to psychology to linguistics.
A Daily Mail reporter wrote an article suggesting that the criticism was in fact a bombshell showing the NOAA had "duped" world leaders.
The article had some serious factual errors.
A climate science doubting congressman cited it as evidence of a conspiracy to hide data at the NOAA.
http://www.businessinsider.com/noaa-clim...ked-2017-2
My id is telling me that we should string assholes like this up in the street.
On this story specifically:
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 8661
Threads: 118
Joined: May 7, 2011
Reputation:
57
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 11:30 am
(This post was last modified: February 10, 2017 at 11:31 am by Aroura.)
(February 10, 2017 at 4:54 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: (February 10, 2017 at 4:41 am)Aroura Wrote: Well, I did ask you what they were, still waiting.
And until you provide something other than what we have from you, and all I've seen is fairly hard right stuff, then what are we supposed to think?
Again, please enlighten us. I'd really like to know about the preponderance of liberal views you hold that make you call yourself a liberal.
I don't have to prove to you anything. I'm not not-a-liberal until you're satisfied otherwise. If you want to know what a liberal is (specifically a social liberal, which I am) then Wikipedia and google are your friends. If you think I've espoused hard right views, I would suggest you be open to the idea that in fact you are just so far left that centrist views appear right. Well, you made a claim. I'm not alone in noting there is as of yet no evidence to support said claim.
Then you got upset when people didn't accept your claim.
You know who's job it is to prove a claim? Until then, I'll go with the evidence, which says, you are not a liberal.
(Also, are you claiming centrist or liberal? Make up your mind!)
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 11:36 am
(This post was last modified: February 10, 2017 at 11:39 am by Faith No More.)
(February 10, 2017 at 4:08 am)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Sorry; you don't get to tell me what my beliefs are lol.
Who's telling you what your beliefs are? Don't be stupid. I'm telling you what you've shown here. Reading your words and seeing what posts you have given kudos to gives the impression that you are very much right-wing. You check all the right-wing boxes, and as far as I've read, you've never made a single liberal statement.
Like I said, if you quack like a duck...
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 11:51 am
Cans trying to claim he's a liberal lol
No I'm a liberal. Trudeau's a liberal . Can is no liberal .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 46092
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 7:09 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 3:03 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 2:17 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: How about 'Daily Shitbag That Can Only Be Called "News" By Someone With Low Standards And A Generous Disposition'?
Boru
Very creative.
So tell me, where do you get your news from?
Online news is NZ Stuff, primarily, various other sites. Print news is Irish Times and the Belly Telly.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 8272
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 7:20 pm
(February 10, 2017 at 7:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 3:03 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Very creative.
So tell me, where do you get your news from?
Online news is NZ Stuff, primarily, various other sites. Print news is Irish Times and the Belly Telly.
Boru
What, no love for De Paper or the Shitdependant?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 7:48 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 1:29 pm)Faith No More Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 1:00 pm)Assimilate Wrote: You want the answer to be left, and of course the right would believe that, they play themselves as the victims after all. The problem most people have when they pick a side is that they can't take a step backwards and objectively see all the holes. The problem is if any media outlet brings up any kind of controversy including the GOP then they scream foul, like everyone is against them. These same outlets talked about the shit show Hillary brought along as well. MSNBC, definitely left leaning, but the truth is most outlets just aren't a hard pro right. Even a 100 percent down the center news station would be deemed as a snowflaking cuck libratard cunt station.
Indeed. The so-called "liberal mainstream media" spent three times as much time talking about Hillary's e-mails during the election than they did on all policies from both candidates combined.
And ten times that amount of time talking about whatever was the Trump scandal of the week.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Daily Heil banned from Wikipedia
February 10, 2017 at 8:26 pm
(February 10, 2017 at 7:48 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: And ten times that amount of time talking about whatever was the Trump scandal of the week.
Well, what were they supposed to do? Ignore the gift that keeps on giving?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
|
