(June 9, 2017 at 6:51 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Tizheruk, do you understand sarcasm?

I was referring to capnAwesome . I don't think he was being sarcastic .

(June 9, 2017 at 7:09 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 6:51 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Tizheruk, do you understand sarcasm?

I was referring to capnAwesome . I don't think he was being sarcastic .

You should have quoted him, because there was no response from him on that page.

(June 9, 2017 at 7:11 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 7:09 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: I was referring to capnAwesome . I don't think he was being sarcastic .

You should have quoted him, because there was no response from him on that page.

Noted

I believe we are witnessing the beginning of the end.

(June 9, 2017 at 7:35 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I believe we are witnessing the beginning of the end.

The end of what?

(June 9, 2017 at 7:36 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 7:35 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I believe we are witnessing the beginning of the end.

The end of what?

Trump: support, political effectiveness, political career, ...............

Even the die hard's in fly over country are starting to spit.

(June 9, 2017 at 5:22 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 5:13 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Regarding how much we know about Trump, his Twitter outrages, do you honestly believe him innocent in what he was conveying?

I have no way of knowing without evidence. I don't know when atheists abandoned this principle. I guess with the election of Trump?

Must be tough to be a trust fund baby born into privilege that allows you an enormously extended childhood.  Kind of tough to think critically about a system which continues to squeeze the poor ever more tightly in order to maintain that privilege.  Or did you think cognitive dissonance only applied to god belief?

(June 9, 2017 at 5:10 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:

(June 8, 2017 at 11:00 am)Lutrinae Wrote: I can look at someone the right way and state, "I hope you can let this go" with the implication of the look that I actually mean "I order you to let this go."

Yeah you can, or you can make it sound like a casual suggestion. We don't really know how Trump meant it, and I always stick to the ethos of no belief without evidence.

Is like arguing you cant figure out who murdered who unless you have video of the murder.

Trump is entitled to due process too yes, but to say he is squeaky clean after decades of his behavior would be fooling yourself. 

According to the courts so far, he is legally innocent, so what? Sometimes assholes do get away with a lifetime of crappy behavior.

(June 9, 2017 at 5:22 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 5:13 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Regarding how much we know about Trump, his Twitter outrages, do you honestly believe him innocent in what he was conveying?

I have no way of knowing without evidence. I don't know when atheists abandoned this principle. I guess with the election of Trump?

Given the fact that you haven't (to my knowledge) worked in a bureaucracy or corporate structure, your incomplete understanding of what was being conveyed is understandable.

To a diligent employee in either context, Trump's meaning was perfectly clear.

(June 9, 2017 at 5:16 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

(June 9, 2017 at 5:14 pm)Minimalist Wrote: No doubt about where the WLB learned that shit.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016...a-figures/


Lying prick.

I cannot find the article right now, but he just made it public that he is willing to testify under oath that Comey is the liar.

This orange soda is disgusting.

---

This is good enough:

Quote:Today Trump alleged that Comey lied about their interactions in his testimony. When asked if he’d be willing to testify under oath, Trump said he “100%” would.

http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/06/09/...nge-comey/

Narcissist's have this fascinating belief that they can convince (read manipulate) anyone into believing what they say. They even think they can beat lie detector tests.

I wouldn't believe him if his tongue came notarized.