(June 20, 2017 at 8:37 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The risk of dangerous shrapnels can be attenuated if the suicide bomber is placed in a deep pool of molten pig fat for his detonation.

I've often thought that if we're to have capital punishment for terrorist's, it should be lethal injection. We should widely advertise the method and make certain they are fully aware that if they commit an atrocity, are capture and found guilty the following will be carried out:

Infect a pig with Anthrax, allow said pig to get good ad sick from it, draw out a very large vial of it's blood and inject it into the convicted terrorist. Make certain the terrorist understands that it's infected pigs blood.

Since the terrorist was fully aware of the fact that he would be injected with the blood of a pig if caught and convicted, he has no religious out. In the event he/she isn't a muslim, well death by Anthrax infected pigs blood probably isn't going to be very pleasant.

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree with capital punishment in any case. But, if we're going to do it, I say take it to their level.

anthrax is unnecessary, the swine blood is sufficiently out of type from human blood there will be a major (fatal) reaction to it

(June 20, 2017 at 10:16 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 7:57 pm)Fireball Wrote: FTFY. No need to have shrapnel go long distance to a potential victim.

Well, you'd have clear screens all around to protect the spectators.

We used Lexan™ shielding when we didn't want to get hurt by debris. The thickness depended on the calculated danger.

(June 20, 2017 at 11:00 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: anthrax is unnecessary, the swine blood is sufficiently out of type from human blood there will be a major (fatal) reaction to it

Nope. Pigs aren't different enough.

Xenotransfusion

Quote:XTF has not been tested in humans, however current evidence shows that pRBCs will function normally in humans due to a relation between porcine blood groups and human ABO group system.[6] In addition, it is possible to produce pigs with type O blood and it is also possible to genetically modify the pig to make its blood more compatible with humans. Sus scrofa domesticus’s blood will be used to save lives and to increase blood quantity. The organism will be kept alive and no serious harm will be involved in XTF. It will be similar to how blood is removed from humans. Only 10% of the animal’s blood volume will be used each time, therefore, it is ethically acceptable to raise pigs for periodical blood collection as it does not damage the health of the animal. It will also be ethical to use pRBCs on humans since it will not cause a severe harm on human’s health.

(June 20, 2017 at 11:00 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: anthrax is unnecessary, the swine blood is sufficiently out of type from human blood there will be a major (fatal) reaction to it

Just put a real football in the perp's hands. They are made from pigs. Done.

(June 20, 2017 at 10:55 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 8:37 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The risk of dangerous shrapnels can be attenuated if the suicide bomber is placed in a deep pool of molten pig fat for his detonation.

I've often thought that if we're to have capital punishment for terrorist's, it should be lethal injection. We should widely advertise the method and make certain they are fully aware that if they commit an atrocity, are capture and found guilty the following will be carried out:

Infect a pig with Anthrax, allow said pig to get good ad sick from it, draw out a very large vial of it's blood and inject it into the convicted terrorist. Make certain the terrorist understands that it's infected pigs blood.

Since the terrorist was fully aware of the fact that he would be injected with the blood of a pig if caught and convicted, he has no religious out. In the event he/she isn't a muslim, well death by Anthrax infected pigs blood probably isn't going to be very pleasant.

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree with capital punishment in any case. But, if we're going to do it, I say take it to their level.

Then that'll probably give them more incentive to try and do it right and blow themselves up before we can catch them. Also, IIRC, most Muslim scholars seem to agree that if a Muslim ingests pork products either against their will or unknowingly, it's not a sin.

(June 20, 2017 at 11:23 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 10:55 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I've often thought that if we're to have capital punishment for terrorist's, it should be lethal injection. We should widely advertise the method and make certain they are fully aware that if they commit an atrocity, are capture and found guilty the following will be carried out:

Infect a pig with Anthrax, allow said pig to get good ad sick from it, draw out a very large vial of it's blood and inject it into the convicted terrorist. Make certain the terrorist understands that it's infected pigs blood.

Since the terrorist was fully aware of the fact that he would be injected with the blood of a pig if caught and convicted, he has no religious out. In the event he/she isn't a muslim, well death by Anthrax infected pigs blood probably isn't going to be very pleasant.

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree with capital punishment in any case. But, if we're going to do it, I say take it to their level.

Then that'll probably give them more incentive to try and do it right and blow themselves up before we can catch them. Also, IIRC, most Muslim scholars seem to agree that if a Muslim ingests pork products either against their will or unknowingly, it's not a sin.

That's why we make sure they know what will happen before hand. Hard to argue either against their will or unknowing if they know full well before hand and still decide to do it.

(June 20, 2017 at 11:51 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 11:23 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Then that'll probably give them more incentive to try and do it right and blow themselves up before we can catch them. Also, IIRC, most Muslim scholars seem to agree that if a Muslim ingests pork products either against their will or unknowingly, it's not a sin.

That's why we make sure they know what will happen before hand. Hard to argue either against their will or unknowing if they know full well before hand and still decide to do it.

Still think they'd file that as unwilling.

http://atheistforums.com/index.php?topic=11678.0

I think living out their days in solitary supermax is fine by me ... one hour of sunlight a day, no books, no writing materials, and bread and water.