I honestly think that, since we've answered the questions more than once, we should just close this thread and move on with our lives.

(June 20, 2017 at 8:44 pm)Cyberman Wrote:

Administrator Notice
Alright then - just for you.

If I had a dick... it'd be hard.

Just get a strapon and walk around with it, you know, when you go shopping just to let people know you're happy!

Try not to poke the kiddie's eyes out, that's all!

I only employ my strapon for special occasions

(June 20, 2017 at 7:28 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Before anything else, I wonder whether what I write below could be a violation of the rule against calling out a poster.

I could get banned and that's too bad for me, and congratulations to my opponents here.

You now will no longer have someone here to remind you, Oh ye atheists, that you are all the time into evasiveness, and nothing of any intelligent thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious reason.

By the way I am getting to know better the mechanics of communication in this atheistforums.org: still I see nothing in the big picture with atheists' words, they are all the time into evasiveness, and all hatred, anger, foul language, which is all cover up for instead thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious reason.

See you guys all again tomorrow, though...

---

Here is my experience with having addressed a question to the board named “Questions for Staff” in this atheistforums.org forum:

Title of thread from Mariosep to board on Questions for Staff:
Inquiry on two posts which could be against not calling out a poster.

Result:
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Thread Closed, after only the first post the OP from me and another post from me, then more posts from staff members, the thread has been closed - sad, very sad.

I was not able to interact with the staff members at all, for example, I want to get a uniform unanimous definitive decision from them all, as like through a poll with them by themselves on their judgment.

First post of Mariosep

In his OP Mariosep Wrote:Atheist Forums › Site Specific › Questions for Staff
Inquiry on two posts which could be against not calling out a poster.
Post #1 Inquiry on two posts which could be against not calling out a poster.
19th June 2017, 13:57
________________________________


First, thanks a lot for the access to your forum; I will just take this occasion to say that it is typical of web forums to have rules, etc., but some good minds should work out what I might call all these rules, etc., etc., etc. that they be user friendly.

The way I see them in all forums, they are susceptible to be interpreted by powers that be or members of a forum, as to be violated by posters who just are into good faith sharing thoughts with other posters, with no malice of violating the rules, etc. etc. etc.

Rules, etc. etc. etc. in web forums could be similar to laws of the land, that when the government wants to get you, it is altogether within the laws etc. etc. etc. that they will get you, period.

---

   
_______________________________________


I am taking time and labor to investigate Stimbo to find out what happened to me, which made me stop posting here in a previous sojourn.

Here is one post that can be taken to transgress against the rule of no calling out a poster.

   
________________________________


Here is another post that can be taken to transgress against no calling out a poster:

[End of  Post 1 the OP to the AF Staff]

_________________________

The only another post from Mariosep:

Quote:Post #7 RE: Inquiry on two posts which could be against not calling out a poster.
Yesterday, 10:31
___________________________


Please bear with my ignorance, but I was thinking that I will be talking with staff members, are you folks here staff members, and how do plain members get to know you to be staff members?

Like this member with this description: "Milk Chocolate Bimbo Mod Overlord."

Now that I am talking with members who could be in fact staff members, may I just take the occasion to ask whether this forum, atheistforums.org, is explicitly allowing, and thus in effect encouraging on the part of posters here, the use of foul language?

Now you will say that you don't know what foul language I am talking about.

If that is so, then I will have to look up some samples which I consider to be instances of foul language, and next time I check in here I will give them to you, when I read from you that you don't know what is the meaning of foul language.

Okay, dear staff members(?):
1. My question is not answered definitively because some of you claim to not know what I am asking, though I see that to be very disingenuous.
2. Are you in fact staff members, and how are plain members to know that?
3. Why are you guys always into evasiveness, and you will ask me what I mean by evasiveness? It is close to disingenuous-ness.

I will also take this occasion to inquire, is this Stimbo a genuine staff member, he describes himself as Administrator, Prophet in residence?

Please abstain from projecting yourselves to be funny, unless you use that for a cover of your whatever you feel to be lacking in substance in yourselves.


Annex:
Questions for Staff New Thread
Have a question for AF forum staff? Post it here. Only threads you start are visible to you.

[End of the only other post from Mariosep]

I think a radical and comprehensive dactylectomy is in order to stop this sort of shitposting.

(June 20, 2017 at 11:56 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 7:28 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Before anything else, I wonder whether what I write below could be a violation of the rule against calling out a poster.

I could get banned and that's too bad for me, and congratulations to my opponents here.

You now will no longer have someone here to remind you, Oh ye atheists, that you are all the time into evasiveness, and nothing of any intelligent thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious reason.

By the way I am getting to know better the mechanics of communication in this atheistforums.org: still I see nothing in the big picture with atheists' words, they are all the time into evasiveness, and all hatred, anger, foul language, which is all cover up for instead thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious reason.

See you guys all again tomorrow, though...

---

Here is my experience with having addressed a question to the board named “Questions for Staff” in this atheistforums.org forum:

Title of thread from Mariosep to board on Questions for Staff:
Inquiry on two posts which could be against not calling out a poster.

Result:
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Thread Closed, after only the first post the OP from me and another post from me, then more posts from staff members, the thread has been closed - sad, very sad.

I was not able to interact with the staff members at all, for example, I want to get a uniform unanimous definitive decision from them all, as like through a poll with them by themselves on their judgment.

First post of Mariosep
_________________________

The only another post from Mariosep:

[End of the only other post from Mariosep]

I think a radical and comprehensive dactylectomy is in order to stop this sort of shitposting.

As a qualified person I would suggest a double-barrelled lobotomy...

(June 20, 2017 at 11:59 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(June 20, 2017 at 11:56 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I think a radical and comprehensive dactylectomy is in order to stop this sort of shitposting.

As a qualified person I would suggest a double-barrelled lobotomy...

Pretty sure someone beat you to the punch there, Beccs.

I am fully ok with a derail of this thread, by the way. As clearly the OP wishes to be evasive as fuck and not actually engage with anyone about anything meaningful. Which is fine, too, of course.

So...does anyone know any good stories about bridges?

I know he comes across a little troll-y, but in his defence:

He's Italian, so profoundly and hopelessly Catholic!
HE Eeeeenglish NO VERY GOOD MUCHLY
Google is not a very good translator expressing subtle sentiments cross culturally
He has small penis syndrome
He's a whiny arrogant little sod
His mother has a moustache

All of these things work against him and inadvertently portray him as a troll.
But who is the real victim?