Bye, Felicia.

(July 16, 2017 at 5:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote:

(July 16, 2017 at 5:37 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Which is your privilege. Just as it is mine to inform you that your view of events is wrong.

Okay. We both have the privilege of voicing our opinions on matters.

I disagree with your assessment, but I concur with that statement.

I suppose I do have the advantage of having access to the report documents.

(July 16, 2017 at 5:52 pm)Cyberman Wrote:

(July 16, 2017 at 5:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Okay. We both have the privilege of voicing our opinions on matters.

I disagree with your assessment, but I concur with that statement.

I suppose I do have the advantage of having access to the report documents.

Very well. 
And?

And Tiberius performed a routine edit of a post that breached the 'quoting accurately' rule, using no more than the standard authority granted to any single member of Staff. No favouritism, no bias, no pleasured donkeys. I could and would have done the same thing myself had I been fit for duty at the time.

(July 16, 2017 at 6:02 pm)Cyberman Wrote: And Tiberius performed a routine edit of a post that breached the 'quoting accurately' rule, using no more than the standard authority granted to any single member of Staff. No favouritism, no bias, no pleasured donkeys. I could and would have done the same thing myself had I been fit for duty at the time.

Yes. I became aware of the fact that Tiberius was the one who modified my post shortly after the change occurred.
I've mentioned this a few times before: Would you believe that repeating or printing someone's EXACT WORDS, despite their decision to retract them at a later time, is not misquoting? By definition, is simply is NOT. 

And, that in regards to the Forum Rules, I did not add to, change, delete, modify, or alter either of her posts in any fashion, whatsoever. I simply posted both texts in their entirety; The original one, which I'd already started composing a response to prior to it being edited, and the edited version. 

With all of that being said, how do you FAIRLY arrive at the conclusion that an actual rule violation occurred on my part? Also, how exactly were you able to ascertain that Mr. Tiberius' decision to modify a post containing his wife's quotes, involved absolutely no bias?

On some level, I can easily understand why he would be motivated to edit his wife's post. Plus, it's his forum. I get that. But, it's clear enough that the modification was done, and THEN the "justification" for deeming me a rule-violator was sloppily and dishonestly built around it. 

A "Fuck you, Thena. This is my forum, and you're not going my trash my wife like that." could have sufficed, as opposed to watching Staff members dance around the the ACTUAL rules in a fairly sleazy attempt to somehow MAKE my actions fit the definition of misquoting, when they clearly don't. 

Though I'm clearly of the opinion that Mrs. Tibs had it coming to her, I actually would've respected that.

You continue to insist that you quoted it prior to the edit. The time stamps say otherwise.

How could you even have the edited version in the same post if you posted it before it was edited? You could not.

(July 16, 2017 at 8:03 pm)Losty Wrote: You continue to insist that you quoted it prior to the edit. The time stamps say otherwise.

No, Losty. I said that I clicked Reply and began composing my response BEFORE it was edited.

Fair enough, I had no way of knowing that was the case when I agreed to the edit of your post. I would have assumed it was if it were a few minutes difference but it was over 10 minutes after the edit so it seemed unlikely.

(July 16, 2017 at 8:11 pm)Losty Wrote: Fair enough, I had no way of knowing that was the case when I agreed to the edit.

I'm missing something, apparently. 
Why do you keep saying you edited it, when Tibs did the editing?