Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
November 11, 2017 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2017 at 10:30 pm by Cyberman.)
Never tried it. I think I could be up for anything in a sexy situation. Are you volunteering? 
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
November 11, 2017 at 10:31 pm
(November 11, 2017 at 10:24 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Never tried it. I think I could be up for anything in a sexy situation.
Even scat?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
November 11, 2017 at 10:47 pm
Almost anything.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
November 11, 2017 at 10:55 pm
(November 11, 2017 at 1:01 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: thinking about it makes me gayer . . .
You're about as gay as gay can get already
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: February 7, 2018
Reputation:
0
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am
(November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: (November 1, 2017 at 11:28 am)Tiberius Wrote: 2. Be accurate. Check your sources before posting, ensure that you have the facts. If you are presenting someone else's opinion, use quotes and don't editorialize what they are saying unless you make it clear that this is your interpretation rather than what they have said specifically.
There go all the threads made by religious folk!!
As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.
Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!)
My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 10:18 am
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote: (November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!!
As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.
Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!)
My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
How about an introduction thread?
Necroing posts is generally frowned upon.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 10:57 am
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote: My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
Oddly, I don't see any reports from you for these alleged violations.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 11:16 am
Maybe he just admitted that he's a sock.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 11:49 am
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote: (November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!!
As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.
Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!)
My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
Interesting.... I don't remember those threads.
Care to link to them?
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
February 7, 2018 at 12:35 pm
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote: (November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!!
As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.
Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!)
My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
For starters you could learn the difference between a post and a thread.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
|
